451:
not intended to be, Her most cited paper, in a good specialized journal, ids a review, with 111 cites. The second is another review paper, published in a not very important journal, with 106 citation, Her 3rd is a research paper, not a review, in a decent specialized journal, & has 64 citations. Fifth is a review. Sixth, a research paper in a fairly good journal, has 54. I unfortunately do not see any paper in a really internationally famous first rate nonspecialized journal. But plant biochemistry is a field with relatively low citation figures as compared to some fields, and the proportion of review papers is an indication of her senior status. It is possible that her greatest notability is as a scientific administrator.
426:
particular in India, in fact, where major foreign awards are considered more prestigious than national ones. That does not prove that the standard might not be sufficient nonetheless. We are left with two very unfortunate choices: either recognizing the lack of merit of certain national societies, or admitting people to a recognized international standard depending on what countries they come from. I would very much like to avoid making such a general determination here, or at any of the individual AfDs. Perhaps we shouldctry to look at whether it meets the basic WP:PROF standard. If it does, that would be sufficient. that will take some further analysis.
420:
on the assumption that people who meet the shortcuts always have such recognition, or they would not have been elected, given the prize, etc.-- and that the committees involved in such honours are better judges of this than we are. It is generally considered here that scientific notability is international. and the standard is international.
419:
Notability under WP PROF is based upon the extent to which the person is an authority, and is normally proven in science by the citations to their peer-reviewed contributions to scientific journals. The criteria of society membership is a shortcut (among other possible short-cuts, such as prizes),
450:
is complicated because of other people with the same or similar names. Of her papers, many are review articles, not primary work--such papers generally have much higher citation counts than research articles, and are normally invited papers, not peer reviewed; they are not research articles and
425:
In this case the question is whether the standards of this particular national society are sufficiently high to prove this. I am undecided on this. I certainly think that it is not as high as the Royal society or the NAS US, and that this non-equivalence is recognized in India as elsewhere--
536:
I think there is some confusion about who is this person. It has not even been established whether this is a man or a woman. The
Humboldt Research Fellow seems to be a man by the name of "Paras Kumar Anand" (Anand being the last name), active in cell biology,
541:. The first referene in the article showed a man with a different name, possibly the successor of the subject of this article as Project Manager. The school sites show the school building, no info on alumni. we should try to establish first who is this.
338:. She is also FNAS. A notability tag was added on this last month. I will selectively remove such tags from this, and all such articles if this article sustain in this afd. I also invite all editors who commented on this article to also join this
179:
286:
447:. Looking at the basic standard, which is the number of citations to the scientific peer-reviewed articles, the result is not straight-forward. Analysis of google Scholar
173:
132:
538:
266:
391:
The person is a well-known molecular biologist noted for his significant research contributions. All citations are genuine. The article should not be deleted.
246:
139:
105:
100:
398:
109:
228:-Per nom. Though often these names with no first name listed are tough to find to be honest. Still not looking good at the moment.
339:
92:
17:
194:
448:
161:
67:
490:
362:
569:
477:
347:
215:
155:
40:
550:
528:
505:
481:
462:
437:
406:
380:
351:
322:
298:
278:
258:
237:
219:
151:
74:
342:
that will enact a statutes about
Fellows of selected Indian Societies on WP. Please dont miss out. Cheers!
402:
565:
501:
36:
201:
473:
394:
343:
318:
310:
211:
96:
187:
376:
335:
52:. The article's subject is found to barely meet the minimum standards for notability to be kept.
546:
524:
294:
274:
254:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
564:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
167:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
61:
314:
233:
88:
80:
516:
210:
Article not sourced with reliable references, person is not a notable figure in India
458:
433:
372:
542:
520:
290:
270:
250:
126:
55:
229:
493:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
365:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
453:
428:
558:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
287:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
122:
118:
114:
186:
499:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
371:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
309:. Fellow of the National Academy of Sciences meets
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
572:). No further edits should be made to this page.
200:
8:
285:Note: This debate has been included in the
267:list of Science-related deletion discussions
265:Note: This debate has been included in the
245:Note: This debate has been included in the
392:
284:
264:
247:list of India-related deletion discussions
244:
472:. I think the subject is 'He' not 'She'
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
515:per DGG. Her cite count is
470:Correction for DGG's comment
589:
506:10:02, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
482:06:55, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
463:04:55, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
438:04:39, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
407:07:34, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
381:19:28, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
352:14:29, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
323:13:40, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
299:14:29, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
279:14:29, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
259:14:29, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
238:18:47, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
220:14:04, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
561:Please do not modify it.
551:17:45, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
340:important afd discussion
334:- A user just posted me
75:19:26, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
529:18:55, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
508:
409:
397:comment added by
383:
301:
281:
261:
73:
580:
563:
504:
498:
496:
494:
370:
368:
366:
205:
204:
190:
142:
130:
112:
70:
64:
53:
34:
588:
587:
583:
582:
581:
579:
578:
577:
576:
570:deletion review
559:
509:
500:
489:
487:
474:Educationtemple
384:
361:
359:
344:Educationtemple
212:Educationtemple
147:
138:
103:
89:P. Ananda Kumar
87:
84:
81:P. Ananda Kumar
68:
62:
58:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
586:
584:
575:
574:
554:
553:
531:
497:
486:
485:
484:
466:
465:
441:
440:
422:
421:
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
369:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
326:
325:
303:
302:
282:
262:
241:
240:
208:
207:
144:
83:
78:
56:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
585:
573:
571:
567:
562:
556:
555:
552:
548:
544:
540:
535:
532:
530:
526:
522:
518:
514:
511:
510:
507:
503:
502:North America
495:
492:
483:
479:
475:
471:
468:
467:
464:
460:
456:
455:
449:
446:
443:
442:
439:
435:
431:
430:
424:
423:
418:
415:
408:
404:
400:
396:
390:
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
382:
378:
374:
367:
364:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
330:
329:
328:
327:
324:
320:
316:
312:
311:WP:NACADEMICS
308:
305:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
283:
280:
276:
272:
268:
263:
260:
256:
252:
248:
243:
242:
239:
235:
231:
227:
224:
223:
222:
221:
217:
213:
203:
199:
196:
193:
189:
185:
181:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
153:
150:
149:Find sources:
145:
141:
137:
134:
128:
124:
120:
116:
111:
107:
102:
98:
94:
90:
86:
85:
82:
79:
77:
76:
71:
65:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
560:
557:
533:
512:
488:
469:
452:
444:
427:
416:
399:14.139.95.56
393:— Preceding
360:
336:this article
331:
306:
225:
209:
197:
191:
183:
176:
170:
164:
158:
148:
135:
49:
47:
31:
28:
517:good enough
174:free images
315:Necrothesp
63:have a cup
566:talk page
513:Weak keep
445:Weak keep
291:• Gene93k
271:• Gene93k
251:• Gene93k
37:talk page
568:or in a
539:see here
491:Relisted
395:unsigned
373:Davewild
363:Relisted
133:View log
39:or in a
543:Kraxler
534:Comment
521:Bearian
417:Comment
332:Comment
313:#3. --
180:WP refs
168:scholar
106:protect
101:history
226:Delete
152:Google
110:delete
57:Coffee
459:talk
434:talk
230:Wgolf
195:JSTOR
156:books
140:Stats
127:views
119:watch
115:links
69:beans
16:<
547:talk
525:talk
478:talk
403:talk
377:talk
348:talk
319:talk
307:Keep
295:talk
275:talk
255:talk
234:talk
216:talk
188:FENS
162:news
123:logs
97:talk
93:edit
50:keep
454:DGG
429:DGG
202:TWL
131:– (
72://
66://
60://
549:)
527:)
519:.
480:)
461:)
436:)
405:)
379:)
350:)
321:)
297:)
289:.
277:)
269:.
257:)
249:.
236:)
218:)
182:)
125:|
121:|
117:|
113:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
54:—
545:(
523:(
476:(
457:(
432:(
401:(
375:(
346:(
317:(
293:(
273:(
253:(
232:(
214:(
206:)
198:·
192:·
184:·
177:·
171:·
165:·
159:·
154:(
146:(
143:)
136:·
129:)
91:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.