266:
1127:
I'm afraid I disagree that they are sufficiently notable or specific. If I'm missing something else in this long discussion I do apologise, but please point to it. Perhaps, though, we could include a mention of the "many blogs" into the main article and list this as one of them, if we consider that kind of mention notable. That seems to be all we have a source for. Personally, I would delete this article, and submit any suggestions for such merged content to the other article talk page for discussion, because I'm not sure if that "list of blogs" content would be considered notable.
864:
Minister's office to a letter they wrote (I'd be disappointed if
Ministers didn't ensure that their subordinates reply to all letters they receive), both on local online news/music sites, there doesn't seem to be anything along those lines. Maybe I'm just missing it. If I'm absolutely honest, probably the amount of "puffery" contained in these articles, and arguably outright deception with the faked image and its description at least, has made me a little reluctant to take anything said by sources related to the "organisation" at face value without independent sources.
671:. I have personally seen some articles that don't have any references at all. So far it seems like a straight forward article providing useful information. I am very familiar with Caribbean politics, having travelled to the region for many years. However, my field is Social Anthropology and Mathematical Statistics. I recall being in Trinidad for there last elections i think it was in mid to late 2010 and I recall them mentioning this on the television. Well I will let you guys continue discussing, since it appears I am late to add any contributions to the matter. (
841:. As a national political party, PNM certainly warrants Wiki Page, and there's no reason why branches of the party can't get a mention there. However, there seems to be near zero coverage about PNM in its own right. Normally I would suggest a merge, but given that the vast majority of this article is unsourced and at least one bit of the article (the picture) has been shown as misleading, I just don't think anything in the article is reliable enough to be worth preserving.
1165:: the site's search function appears to be broken, giving "No records found" even for search terms like "trinidad"; but I don't find PNM Abroad mentioned in the "History" section, or in "Party units", or in any other part of the site that might logically list the party's official tentacles. That leads me to question their standing as an official branch of the party; and in any case, my Google search has persuaded me that the organization fails
379:
personal information at all, and I'm sorry that happened. If you want the names back in, please re-add them, or ask - it's difficult to know I'm doing the right thing, here. The problem is that I cannot find a single reference in a reliable source that discusses anything notable about this organisation. The rest of my concerns are above. I've already said more than enough, so I shan't comment here again.
1233:. That this organization might be based around a blog or a website is irrelevant to the issue; the premise of what makes a reasonable redirect is the likelihood of use as a search term. I think it's reasonable to conclude that it is, and whether or not this is an "official" branch of the party (a merger being inappropriate otherwise), people may well use it as a search term
1121:
As mentioned above, if there were any real evidence in RS of PNM Abroad being an official overseas branch of PNM, I would wholeheartedly agree with this. However, I haven't seen that evidence, merely a claim on their own website, and some
Facebook links. Without such evidence, this could just be one
395:
I am contesting the deletion process. I find it arbitrary and unfair. What is so wrong with this article now. If you require evidence please feel free to contact the Hon. Leader of the
Opposition, Dr. Keith Rowley or you can even contact PNM Abroad on the following admin at pnmabroad.org. All of the
378:
Ok, I didn't mean for you to name yourself, I was just trying to ascertain if you were working with the organisation in any way, because you seem awfully keen to include this information, and it doesn't seem notable enough, I'm sorry. I removed the names, because I wasn't trying to get you to reveal
349:
We do not purport to be anybody notable just subscribers to the PNM Abroad
Organization. We thought creating an article of this nature would be beneficial, since the organization reaches out to so many people across the world. At least those interested in T&T politics. What warrants this page to
631:
Thanks for the contribution, Dr.Robertson. Because you appear to be a very new contributor, you may not have realised that this is a discussion, rather than a vote. That's why you'll see some people around here use the term !vote, in recognition of that. What that means, is that when the discussion
1126:
overseas branch, then we should be able to source that. Apologies if I've just missed the necessary evidence in the long discussion. If I'm missing the point, and the references to the "sent a letter to a minister and got reply" are being taken as sufficient to demonstrate "official" party status,
1031:
Oh, ok: since I nominated the
Article for deletion, my default position will be taken as "Delete" by the closer, as I understand it, unless I state otherwise. I haven't, unfortunately, seen or found anything that would be enough to move me from that default "Delete" position. (at first, I wondered
1206:
It's a reasonable redirect if we can point to reliable sources that this is a branch of the party, and not just a keen, independent blog/website. I still don't see how we can determine, other than vague mentions in the few provided sources that don't seem to determine this, and assertions in self
976:
This shows that the PNM has a very huge online and social community and by looking at the official pages of both the former PM and the Party fb page it clearly points to an association. What one now has to ask yourself is... why would the party page and former PM's page link back to PNM Abroad if
1014:
I have just alluded to you that I created the image on the billboard using fotofunia. But the logo itself on the billboard is theirs. So would you suggest a rewrite or redirection? Because deletion is not warranted. I didn't realize hypothetical images were such a big deal on
Knowledge (XXG) its
993:
Nobody here has said, or implied that the organisation is "fake". I have commented on the amount of undue "puffery" in the articles, and the misleading fake image. I have no doubt PNM Abroad exists - it has a website, and a
Facebook page, I've seen them... What I haven't been able to find is the
810:
Yes, I think it's commendable, too, when a new editor finds a discussion like this and puts in time and effort to try and help to find a source like that, which we had been unable to. Sad, as you say, that it doesn't help establish notability. Many thanks again to Dr.PeterRobertson for all his
863:
the "official" overseas arm of the PNM, then I would agree it was worthy of a brief mention in the main PNM article or a redirect. However, other than their own statement on their website, a facebook page, a few comments on some blogs and the 2 minor mentions of someone getting a reply from a
700:"Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. All content must be verifiable. If no independent, third-party, reliable sources can be found on a topic, then Knowledge (XXG) should not have an article on it."
350:
be deleted?. You have given good reason for the other page we made. But not for this one and we contest it outright, because it is unjustified. We even agreed with you that the other page ought to be deleted speedily and sent to a sandbox. But not this one
640:, whilst it is probably better than saying nothing at all, doesn't add to the weight of argument against deletion. In this case, to do that, it would seem the requirement would be provision of in depth coverage of this subject by an independent, secondary,
487:
David, if you can provide sources that cover this organisation from
Trinidad and Tobago then please by all means do. I and the other contributors to this discussion have drawn a blank, but if you can produce in-depth coverage of PNM Abroad in
873:, which basically said "Please stop other people from editing my article". During subsequent attempts to help it began to become clear to me that there was no foundation in reliable sources for any of it. I've been following it since then.
414:
did anyone bother to look a this page?. Also I just noticed some of your unprofessional comments. He is not just some student, he has done alot for his country and invested his own money. Try doing proper research before you guys open your
757:. It would be ideal to establish that Pearce Robinson heads PNM Abroad, but only once PNM Abroad's notability has been established. This needs a source that talks about the organisation in more depth, rather than just mentioning them.
922:- I created the photo on a website with their logo. That isn't really how there logo is I just made that because the normal logo by itself looks boring. But PNM Abroad if you check former Prime Minister of TT Patrick Manning
161:
55:. There is a clear consensus that PNM Abroad should not have its own article at this point, but several editors support the idea of a redirect and only one editor argues explicitly against a redirect.
523:
567:
122:
1112:
974:"It’s difficult keeping up with the number of PNM blogs which are all over Facebook and other social media including PNM, PNM tv, PNM Abroad, PNM Mediamagnum and a host of others"
239:"It’s difficult keeping up with the number of PNM blogs which are all over Facebook and other social media including PNM, PNM tv, PNM Abroad, PNM Mediamagnum and a host of others"
545:
442:
does that; and since it does not appear to have deemed PNM Abroad either relevent or newsworthy, a
Knowledge (XXG) article is not warranted. See the relevent guidelines at
589:
209:
753:
I strongly commend your effort to find sources, kudos for that. Unfortunately, this one doesn't constitute "significant coverage", which is what's required to establish
396:
information you require is on their various websites. Unless you guys pick and chose what
Political Organization in the world is relevant or newsworthy over others. (
155:
663:
Thank you for taking the time to explain the process to me. I think the article is fine from what i've read so far. Might need a little more sourcing in terms of
899:, there is no real evidence that this organisation is sufficiently notable to warrant an article of its own, although it may just deserve a mention in the main
1207:
published sources, that PNM Abroad is related to the PNM. Not trying to badger at all - just confused that others seem to see what I can't, and I have looked.
998:
that is necessary, as explained. As another editor has mentioned above, if that were present, no honourable editor would vote to delete here.
952:
469:
Oh is that correct so press from Trinidad and Tobago is not referenced as International Media? Am I to understand that for your utterances. (
366:
636:
just count the votes - they will assess the validity and relevance of argument expressed on both "sides" of the discussion. So, just saying
1137:
1186:
This is a branch of an organization, the ], and should, by our normal practices, be covered briefly there. It's a reasonable redirect.
792:
I think you did too (I certainly didn't find that source myself). Sadly, some stuff just ain't notable. Top marks for effort, though.
17:
737:
Hi guys, I actually found a news report on a TT radio indian station about this. . I found a couple of others, but they are blogs.(
1161:
website for the phrase "pnm abroad" yields nothing more about them. Nor does PNM Abroad appear to be linked or discussed on the
438:, "we" do not pick and choose which political organisation is relevent or newsworthy. The international media, as represented by
1108:
95:
90:
644:. Apologies for the length of reply - I just wanted to take the time to explain what could be an unfamiliar process to you.
1085:
846:
801:
766:
508:
459:
99:
176:
1264:
143:
40:
1230:
1100:
908:
900:
834:
781:
742:
676:
617:
296:
82:
51:
694:, the General Notability guidelines. That will, I hope, help to answer your questions about notability. There's also
232:
1104:
667:. However, is it that we delete articles or vote on the process of deletion based on a lack of adequate sourcing?
192:
Non notable "organisation". No sourced claim to notability. Cannot find substantial mention in reliable sources.
1057:
1020:
982:
948:
933:
362:
314:
272:
which was in the article at time of posting this. These guys sure seem to put up a few posters around the place.
842:
234:, amounting to: "He sent a letter to a Minister, and got a reply from a subordinate". The other claimed source
137:
940:
354:
320:
1053:
1016:
978:
944:
929:
904:
896:
870:
777:
738:
672:
613:
358:
310:
292:
60:
269:
1260:
474:
420:
401:
36:
133:
1245:
1217:
1197:
1178:
1089:
1061:
1046:
1024:
1008:
986:
956:
912:
883:
850:
821:
805:
785:
770:
746:
712:
680:
654:
621:
601:
581:
559:
537:
512:
478:
470:
463:
435:
424:
416:
405:
397:
389:
370:
341:
324:
300:
282:
255:
221:
202:
64:
1174:
869:
I only came across this article at all through responding to a malformed "protected edit request" at
1032:
why you asked, since my position seems evident, but then I realised you might be expecting to see a
970:
235:
702:. Thanks for the interest in how this works, and I hope you enjoy contributing to Knowledge (XXG).
169:
183:
1122:
of the "many PNM blogs" it is "hard to keep track of" from the quote I gave above. If it is the
1073:
1081:
797:
762:
597:
577:
555:
533:
504:
455:
56:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1259:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
443:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1214:
1134:
1043:
1005:
966:
880:
818:
725:
709:
651:
386:
338:
279:
252:
218:
199:
1166:
1015:
still the logo nonetheless, bit I am guided and will remove if that is what is requested. (
995:
695:
691:
496:
447:
1238:
1170:
86:
664:
641:
492:
439:
242:
149:
754:
1193:
1077:
793:
758:
593:
573:
551:
529:
500:
451:
116:
1209:
1129:
1038:
1000:
875:
813:
720:
704:
668:
646:
381:
333:
309:
We dont think this page should be deleted. The other one yes but not this one. (
274:
247:
213:
194:
78:
70:
499:, then I and any other honest editor will happily !vote to keep the article.
1149:
A Google search turns up no evidence of third-party coverage apart from the
1188:
776:
Well that's all I can do for this one, I think I searched well. Cheers! (
411:
924:
s page and the PNM's official FB page they both link back to PNM ABROAD
1157:
article, neither of which constitute in-depth coverage. Searching the
291:
How did they do that? As you say, those guys have sure been busy! --
1162:
1253:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1068:
This discussion is about the notability or otherwise of the
690:
There is a link in Yunshui's post above, I'll relink here:
895:- despite the best efforts of the article's creator and
112:
108:
104:
1103:
since this is just the overseas branch of the party.--
168:
210:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Pearce Robinson
1072:; to discuss the deletion of the image, please use
859:If there was any evidence that this "organisation"
524:
list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions
182:
568:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1267:). No further edits should be made to this page.
241:. I cannot find anything of significance in any
231:Only attempt at sourced notability seems to be
1036:vote from me - so I understand now, I think.)
928:] That alone should prove its an official arm(
833:, without prejudice to putting information in
546:list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions
590:list of Politics-related deletion discussions
8:
698:, for organisations, which has this to say:
588:Note: This debate has been included in the
566:Note: This debate has been included in the
544:Note: This debate has been included in the
522:Note: This debate has been included in the
587:
565:
543:
521:
977:this is just some fake organization???(
969:referenced earlier when he pointed to
632:is closed, the person closing it will
412:http://pnmabroad.org/about-pnm-abroad/
1153:piece and the passing mention in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
936:) 08:09, 14 January 2012 (UTC))
972:and took the following extract:
1074:it's nomination page at Commons
1:
1246:08:59, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
1218:05:19, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
1198:05:08, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
1179:04:21, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
1138:02:35, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
1113:18:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
1090:10:25, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
1062:09:06, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
1047:09:02, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
1025:08:45, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
1009:08:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
987:08:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
957:08:06, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
913:06:01, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
884:22:24, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
851:21:57, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
822:10:44, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
806:10:33, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
786:10:26, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
771:10:18, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
747:10:06, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
713:06:55, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
681:06:42, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
655:06:21, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
622:05:46, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
602:13:44, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
582:13:42, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
560:13:42, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
538:13:41, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
513:13:43, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
479:13:37, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
464:13:35, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
425:13:12, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
406:12:46, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
390:12:36, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
371:12:27, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
342:12:13, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
325:12:06, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
301:05:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
283:11:44, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
256:10:15, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
222:09:57, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
203:09:54, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
65:10:26, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
901:People's National Movement
1284:
1231:People's National Movement
1101:People's National Movement
835:People's National Movement
52:People's National Movement
1256:Please do not modify it.
994:evidence of meeting the
32:Please do not modify it.
1052:Ohh ok I understand (
1105:The Devil's Advocate
871:Talk:Pearce Robinson
843:Chris Neville-Smith
270:File:PNM Abroad.jpg
265:Just for fun, try:
48:The result was
960:
943:comment added by
905:Daemonic Kangaroo
897:Dr.PeterRobertson
837:, and possibly a
778:Dr.PeterRobertson
739:Dr.PeterRobertson
673:Dr.PeterRobertson
614:Dr.PeterRobertson
604:
584:
571:
562:
549:
540:
527:
374:
357:comment added by
293:Daemonic Kangaroo
237:, actually says:
1275:
1258:
1242:
1216:
1212:
1136:
1132:
1045:
1041:
1007:
1003:
967:User talk:Begoon
959:
937:
882:
878:
820:
816:
727:
723:
711:
707:
653:
649:
572:
550:
528:
493:reliable sources
440:reliable sources
388:
384:
373:
351:
340:
336:
328:
281:
277:
254:
250:
220:
216:
201:
197:
187:
186:
172:
120:
102:
34:
1283:
1282:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1265:deletion review
1254:
1240:
1210:
1208:
1130:
1128:
1054:Distributor2012
1039:
1037:
1017:Distributor2012
1001:
999:
979:Distributor2012
945:Distributor2012
938:
930:Distributor2012
926:] and secondly
903:article. --
876:
874:
814:
812:
721:
719:
705:
703:
665:reliable source
647:
645:
642:reliable source
434:In response to
382:
380:
359:Distributor2012
352:
334:
332:
318:
311:Distributor2012
275:
273:
248:
246:
214:
212:
195:
193:
129:
93:
77:
74:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1281:
1279:
1270:
1269:
1249:
1248:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1201:
1200:
1181:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1116:
1115:
1093:
1092:
1050:
1049:
1012:
1011:
963:
962:
916:
915:
889:
888:
887:
886:
866:
865:
854:
853:
827:
826:
825:
824:
811:efforts here.
774:
773:
735:
734:
733:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
716:
715:
685:
684:
658:
657:
626:
625:
606:
605:
585:
563:
541:
518:
517:
516:
515:
497:the guidelines
467:
466:
393:
392:
347:
346:
345:
344:
331:Who are "we"?
323:comment added
306:
305:
304:
303:
286:
285:
259:
258:
225:
224:
190:
189:
126:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1280:
1268:
1266:
1262:
1257:
1251:
1250:
1247:
1244:
1243:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1225:
1224:
1219:
1215:
1213:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1199:
1195:
1191:
1190:
1185:
1182:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1145:
1144:
1139:
1135:
1133:
1125:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1095:
1094:
1091:
1088:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1048:
1044:
1042:
1035:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1010:
1006:
1004:
997:
992:
991:
990:
988:
984:
980:
975:
971:
968:
961:
958:
954:
950:
946:
942:
935:
931:
927:
925:
921:
918:
917:
914:
910:
906:
902:
898:
894:
891:
890:
885:
881:
879:
872:
868:
867:
862:
858:
857:
856:
855:
852:
848:
844:
840:
836:
832:
829:
828:
823:
819:
817:
809:
808:
807:
804:
803:
799:
795:
791:
790:
789:
787:
783:
779:
772:
769:
768:
764:
760:
756:
752:
751:
750:
748:
744:
740:
726:
724:
718:
717:
714:
710:
708:
701:
697:
693:
689:
688:
687:
686:
682:
678:
674:
670:
666:
662:
661:
660:
659:
656:
652:
650:
643:
639:
635:
630:
629:
628:
627:
623:
619:
615:
611:
608:
607:
603:
599:
595:
591:
586:
583:
579:
575:
569:
564:
561:
557:
553:
547:
542:
539:
535:
531:
525:
520:
519:
514:
511:
510:
506:
502:
498:
494:
491:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
480:
476:
472:
465:
462:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
437:
433:
430:
429:
428:
426:
422:
418:
413:
409:
407:
403:
399:
391:
387:
385:
377:
376:
375:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
343:
339:
337:
330:
329:
326:
322:
316:
312:
308:
307:
302:
298:
294:
290:
289:
288:
287:
284:
280:
278:
271:
267:
264:
261:
260:
257:
253:
251:
244:
240:
236:
233:
230:
227:
226:
223:
219:
217:
211:
207:
206:
205:
204:
200:
198:
185:
181:
178:
175:
171:
167:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
135:
132:
131:Find sources:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
62:
58:
54:
53:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1255:
1252:
1239:
1234:
1226:
1187:
1183:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1123:
1096:
1080:
1069:
1051:
1033:
1013:
973:
964:
939:— Preceding
923:
920:Don't Delete
919:
892:
860:
838:
830:
796:
775:
761:
736:
699:
638:Don't Delete
637:
633:
610:Don't Delete
609:
503:
489:
468:
454:
431:
410:
394:
353:— Preceding
348:
262:
238:
228:
191:
179:
173:
165:
158:
152:
146:
140:
130:
57:Pax:Vobiscum
50:redirect to
49:
47:
31:
28:
1241:Ravenswing
1237:the party.
1163:PNM website
669:User:Begoon
471:DavidHanity
436:DavidHanity
417:DavidHanity
398:DavidHanity
319:—Preceding
156:free images
1171:Ammodramus
1155:TNT Mirror
755:notability
208:see also:
79:PNM Abroad
71:PNM Abroad
1261:talk page
1227:Redirect:
594:• Gene93k
574:• Gene93k
552:• Gene93k
530:• Gene93k
37:talk page
1263:or in a
1151:Guardian
1124:official
953:contribs
941:unsigned
839:redirect
415:mouths.(
367:contribs
355:unsigned
123:View log
39:or in a
1147:Delete.
1078:Yunshui
1070:article
794:Yunshui
759:Yunshui
501:Yunshui
452:Yunshui
444:WP:NOTE
321:undated
229:Comment
162:WP refs
150:scholar
96:protect
91:history
1211:Begoon
1167:WP:GNG
1159:Mirror
1131:Begoon
1040:Begoon
1034:bolded
1002:Begoon
996:WP:GNG
893:Delete
877:Begoon
831:Delete
815:Begoon
722:Begoon
706:Begoon
696:WP:ORG
692:WP:GNG
648:Begoon
495:, per
448:WP:ORG
432:Delete
383:Begoon
335:Begoon
276:Begoon
249:Begoon
215:Begoon
196:Begoon
134:Google
100:delete
1194:talk
1184:merge
1099:with
1097:Merge
177:JSTOR
138:books
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
1175:talk
1109:talk
1058:talk
1021:talk
983:talk
949:talk
934:talk
909:talk
847:talk
782:talk
743:talk
677:talk
618:talk
598:talk
578:talk
556:talk
534:talk
475:talk
446:and
421:talk
402:talk
363:talk
317:))
315:talk
297:talk
263:Also
170:FENS
144:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
61:talk
1235:for
1229:to
1189:DGG
1169:.
965:As
634:not
490:any
184:TWL
121:– (
1196:)
1177:)
1111:)
1076:.
1064:)
1060:)
1027:)
1023:)
989:)
985:)
955:)
951:•
911:)
861:is
849:)
788:)
784:)
749:)
745:)
679:)
620:)
600:)
592:.
580:)
570:.
558:)
548:.
536:)
526:.
481:)
477:)
450:.
427:)
423:)
408:)
404:)
369:)
365:•
299:)
268:v
245:.
243:RS
164:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
63:)
1192:(
1173:(
1107:(
1086:水
1084:
1082:雲
1056:(
1019:(
981:(
947:(
932:(
907:(
845:(
802:水
800:
798:雲
780:(
767:水
765:
763:雲
741:(
683:)
675:(
624:)
616:(
612:(
596:(
576:(
554:(
532:(
509:水
507:
505:雲
473:(
460:水
458:
456:雲
419:(
400:(
361:(
327:.
313:(
295:(
188:)
180:·
174:·
166:·
159:·
153:·
147:·
141:·
136:(
128:(
125:)
119:)
81:(
59:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.