303:. Without a reliable source to establish notability of the topic, this is original research from primary sources. There's nothing to suggest that any secondary sources have found this topic (as opposed to the individual books, authors, and even characters) notable.
377:, a reputed journal that is specialized in tech and science, so it's a source amply reliable for this SF topic, and secondary enough (ie it's not an average gaming or SF site). The notability of this topic is further demonstrated by its palpable influence in the
55:
is that the topic does not deserve an independent article, as no one was able to adequetly refute what was best summarized in ScottyWong's post. However, I am not deleting the article, as I believe there may be some material that can be merged back into
172:
447:
OK; though I think a merge vote is a reasonable one here, I agree that a talk page discussion is the best venue. Guidance from this AfD would be helpful, though. I'm changing my !vote to "merge".
231:
415:, surely. If the list stays, clearly this article has to be separated from the parent, but if the list goes, do you see any reason why this couldn't be merged back into the main article?
166:
133:
106:
101:
110:
93:
394:
257:
522:(largely unsourced) unencyclopaedic, largely 'in-universe', 'laundry list' of appearances of powered exoskeletons (and in the case of the 'Skinsuits' section,
321:
Per sources found by
Cenarium, below, the information is sourceable, but the list is still trivia. What remains after removing the list should be merged to
187:
154:
456:
424:
334:
312:
284:
97:
561:
17:
370:
599:
574:
539:
514:
483:
460:
442:
428:
406:
361:
338:
316:
292:
272:
246:
220:
75:
148:
411:
Those are helpful sources. The article consists mostly of trivia, though; the remainder would fit into the relevant section of
89:
81:
349:
144:
526:
suits) in fictional works. No third party content to establish notability or give encyclopaedic discussion of the topic.
614:
194:
36:
533:
491:
It is not "trivia" to list all notable fictional series which have had a powered exoskeleton. Gets coverage as well.
212:
386:
52:
613:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
68:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
288:
160:
452:
420:
357:
330:
308:
216:
592:
567:
381:, indeed fictional exoskeletons and variants are widely credited for having initiated the development of
353:
554:
587:
412:
369:
This is a notable topic, furthermore of established real life significance. It is the subject of a
322:
180:
61:
57:
47:
582:
laundry list of trivia. Various bits of info can be sourced, but there's no indication that the
448:
438:
416:
402:
397:. There are enough reliably sourceable material for a standalone article. Trivia can be removed.
326:
304:
374:
268:
242:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
474:
this needs a significant rewrite, I am going to nominate it for the
Article rescue squadron,
492:
479:
591:
566:
208:
433:
A merge back is a possibility, although that would be an editorial, talk page, question.
583:
434:
398:
390:
382:
264:
238:
127:
475:
529:
204:
586:
of the topic itself has been established. Merge any sourced info to
590:
before deleting. A redirect doesn't seem necessary in this case.
283:
The top portion is an article, the giant list should be elsewhere.
607:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
232:
list of
Fictional elements-related deletion discussions
123:
119:
115:
179:
51:. After looking over the discussion, it appears the
193:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
617:). No further edits should be made to this page.
550:: The article under discussion here has been
325:. There's not enough for a separate article.
8:
546:
258:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
252:
226:
256:: This debate has been included in the
230:: This debate has been included in the
560:flagged by an editor for review by the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
203:This is a huge list of trivia. —
90:Powered exoskeletons in fiction
82:Powered exoskeletons in fiction
1:
600:19:31, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
575:19:31, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
540:07:52, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
515:01:44, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
484:00:45, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
461:21:12, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
443:21:02, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
429:01:30, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
407:23:57, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
362:05:56, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
339:21:12, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
317:01:08, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
293:07:07, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
273:02:33, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
247:02:33, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
221:15:26, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
76:15:07, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
634:
610:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
562:Article Rescue Squadron
348:no reliable sources to
350:WP:verify notability
588:Powered exoskeleton
413:Powered exoskeleton
323:Powered exoskeleton
58:Powered exoskeleton
48:Powered exoskeleton
44:The result was
565:
375:Popular Mechanics
371:five-page article
275:
261:
249:
235:
625:
612:
597:
596:
572:
571:
559:
553:
538:
511:
508:
505:
502:
499:
496:
262:
236:
198:
197:
183:
131:
113:
71:
34:
633:
632:
628:
627:
626:
624:
623:
622:
621:
615:deletion review
608:
594:
569:
557:
551:
536:
527:
509:
506:
503:
500:
497:
494:
281:Remove the list
140:
104:
88:
85:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
631:
629:
620:
619:
603:
602:
577:
543:
542:
532:
517:
486:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
383:powered armors
364:
343:
342:
341:
295:
285:64.229.103.232
277:
276:
250:
205:Justin (koavf)
201:
200:
137:
84:
79:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
630:
618:
616:
611:
605:
604:
601:
598:
589:
585:
581:
578:
576:
573:
563:
556:
549:
545:
544:
541:
537:
535:
531:
525:
521:
518:
516:
513:
512:
490:
487:
485:
481:
477:
473:
470:
462:
458:
454:
450:
449:Mike Christie
446:
445:
444:
440:
436:
432:
431:
430:
426:
422:
418:
417:Mike Christie
414:
410:
409:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
365:
363:
359:
355:
354:Shooterwalker
351:
347:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
327:Mike Christie
324:
320:
319:
318:
314:
310:
306:
305:Mike Christie
302:
299:
296:
294:
290:
286:
282:
279:
278:
274:
270:
266:
259:
255:
251:
248:
244:
240:
233:
229:
225:
224:
223:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
196:
192:
189:
186:
182:
178:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
146:
143:
142:Find sources:
138:
135:
129:
125:
121:
117:
112:
108:
103:
99:
95:
91:
87:
86:
83:
80:
78:
77:
74:
72:
65:
64:
59:
54:
50:
49:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
609:
606:
579:
547:
528:
523:
519:
493:
488:
471:
378:
366:
345:
300:
297:
280:
253:
227:
202:
190:
184:
176:
169:
163:
157:
151:
141:
66:
62:
45:
43:
31:
28:
391:RIA Novosti
167:free images
584:notability
379:real world
472:Week keep
265:• Gene93k
239:• Gene93k
53:consensus
46:merge to
435:Cenarium
399:Cenarium
385:, refs:
134:View log
520:Delete:
457:library
425:library
335:library
313:library
173:WP refs
161:scholar
107:protect
102:history
593:Snotty
580:Delete
568:Snotty
555:rescue
476:Sadads
346:Delete
301:Delete
145:Google
111:delete
534:Stalk
530:Hrafn
524:other
510:Focus
298:Merge
188:JSTOR
149:books
128:views
120:watch
116:links
16:<
595:Wong
570:Wong
548:Note
489:Keep
480:talk
453:talk
439:talk
421:talk
403:talk
367:Keep
358:talk
331:talk
309:talk
289:talk
269:talk
254:Note
243:talk
228:Note
181:FENS
155:news
124:logs
98:talk
94:edit
70:Talk
387:NYT
373:by
263:--
237:--
195:TWL
132:– (
558:}}
552:{{
482:)
459:)
455:–
441:)
427:)
423:–
405:)
395:AP
393:,
389:,
360:)
352:.
337:)
333:–
315:)
311:–
291:)
271:)
260:.
245:)
234:.
219:☯
175:)
126:|
122:|
118:|
114:|
109:|
105:|
100:|
96:|
63:NW
60:.
564:.
507:m
504:a
501:e
498:r
495:D
478:(
451:(
437:(
419:(
401:(
356:(
329:(
307:(
287:(
267:(
241:(
217:M
215:☺
213:C
211:☮
209:T
207:❤
199:)
191:·
185:·
177:·
170:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
147:(
139:(
136:)
130:)
92:(
73:)
67:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.