286:, Chinese language source is independent, detailed at length, and about the subject software (but it is only one source, it is linked twice). From what I can tell, the source magazine is written for hobbyists, it is not an industry trade rag. The other sources show it being used, multiple times, in industry demonstrations and papers. English speaking sources also show it being used academically at Chinese universities. I don't think the industry conferences and academic use show notability - however, based on them I think their are
350:
The article is serious and the software certainly exists and fulfils a useful purpose. I find an increasingly strong tendency on the part of many editors here to define notability more as whether an article is of personal interest than whether it fulfils the wikipedia definition. I, at least, found
365:
But notability is not about whether the subject exists, or the article is written in a serious tone, or the subject having a purpose, or someone finding the article useful. Knowledge is not simply a repository of information; it tries to be an encyclopedia which covers stuff of
425:: 潘毅傑 is the founder of the company making PowerEsim. The other source cited has two pages in total, and I can't find any mentions of the software on the first page, other than the title and the abstract. (Don't have access to the second.)
157:
118:
237:
151:
290:
we are missing. The user spent quite some time with the article in userspace before submitting it and attempted to address concerns over a month long period.
456:
This is invalid; you may find the article useful and the software does of course exist, but what we're discussing is whether the subject fulfuls the
395:
establishes some notability: not enough to carry the article on its own, but I can't evaluate the
Chinese-language cites. Ergo I
17:
200:
356:
91:
86:
48:. Not a "keep" because the opinions by Panthera germanicus and Ret.Prof are unpersuasive for the reasons given by Haakon.
172:
95:
139:
78:
486:
36:
485:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
352:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
133:
407:
in the article. Certainly the article could use a clean-up, but it is by no means worthy of deletion. —
129:
399:, and assume that there is sufficient coverage in academic literature. I also don't find flamboyant
299:
469:
451:
434:
417:
379:
360:
339:
303:
278:
252:
227:
205:
60:
223:
165:
447:
430:
194:
179:
351:
the article of sufficient value as to discuss it with my mechatronics students this coming week.
400:
322:
248:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
465:
375:
313:
274:
295:
414:
219:
145:
82:
51:
443:
426:
404:
396:
291:
266:
262:
189:
457:
244:
112:
461:
371:
367:
270:
215:
409:
74:
66:
188:
Highly specialised piece of software with no evidence of notability. —
316:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
479:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
460:, which is required for it to be covered by an encylcopedia.
108:
104:
100:
442:
A useful article and the software certainly exists. -
164:
321:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
294:they've done their duty even if they are an SPA.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
489:). No further edits should be made to this page.
391:-- From the references listed in the article:
238:list of Software-related deletion discussions
178:
8:
232:
236:: This debate has been included in the
7:
24:
393:Leakage Inductance Calculation...
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
435:19:52, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
418:06:51, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
380:15:06, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
361:15:03, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
340:14:32, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
304:07:00, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
279:18:35, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
253:01:47, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
228:15:08, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
206:15:05, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
470:02:11, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
458:general notability guideline
452:00:58, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
61:07:23, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
506:
482:Please do not modify it.
288:Chinese language sources
32:Please do not modify it.
403:or other indicators of
261:, non-notable and from
216:significant coverage
353:Panthera germanicus
218:for this software.
44:The result was
342:
255:
241:
59:
497:
484:
416:
412:
337:
320:
318:
242:
204:
183:
182:
168:
116:
98:
58:
56:
49:
34:
505:
504:
500:
499:
498:
496:
495:
494:
493:
487:deletion review
480:
410:
408:
333:
329:
323:
311:
214:: I can't find
192:
125:
89:
73:
70:
52:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
503:
501:
492:
491:
475:
474:
473:
472:
437:
420:
385:
384:
383:
382:
344:
343:
331:
327:
319:
308:
307:
306:
281:
265:with possible
256:
230:
186:
185:
122:
69:
64:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
502:
490:
488:
483:
477:
476:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
454:
453:
449:
445:
441:
438:
436:
432:
428:
424:
421:
419:
415:
413:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
387:
386:
381:
377:
373:
369:
364:
363:
362:
358:
354:
349:
346:
345:
341:
338:
336:
335:
334:
317:
315:
310:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
282:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
257:
254:
250:
246:
239:
235:
231:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
210:
209:
208:
207:
202:
199:
196:
191:
181:
177:
174:
171:
167:
163:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
135:
131:
128:
127:Find sources:
123:
120:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
57:
55:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
481:
478:
439:
422:
392:
388:
347:
326:
325:
324:
312:
287:
283:
258:
233:
211:
197:
187:
175:
169:
161:
154:
148:
142:
136:
126:
53:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
152:free images
401:peacockage
368:notability
330:rbitrarily
296:Miami33139
54:Sandstein
245:• Gene93k
220:Joe Chill
75:Poweresim
67:Poweresim
444:Ret.Prof
427:Tim Song
314:Relisted
201:contribs
190:RHaworth
119:View log
423:Comment
292:I think
158:WP refs
146:scholar
92:protect
87:history
462:Haakon
372:Haakon
271:Haakon
259:Delete
212:Delete
130:Google
96:delete
440:Keep:
173:JSTOR
134:books
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
466:talk
448:talk
431:talk
389:Keep
376:talk
357:talk
348:Keep
300:talk
284:Keep
275:talk
249:talk
234:Note
224:talk
195:talk
166:FENS
140:news
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
405:COI
397:AGF
267:COI
263:SPA
243:--
180:TWL
117:– (
468:)
450:)
433:)
411:æk
378:)
370:.
359:)
302:)
277:)
269:.
251:)
240:.
226:)
160:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
464:(
446:(
429:(
374:(
355:(
332:0
328:A
298:(
273:(
247:(
222:(
203:)
198:·
193:(
184:)
176:·
170:·
162:·
155:·
149:·
143:·
137:·
132:(
124:(
121:)
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.