252:
IF it was advertising, there should be NO pokemon articles at all: wouldn't that be advertising for NINTENDO? Having a
Knowledge (XXG) article for WIKIPEDIA would be advertising as well? It's not spam! Pokemon fans would come onto Knowledge (XXG) for the whole point of learning about Pokemon, not to
248:
I don't think that this should be deleted BECAUSE, it is consistently being vandalised, blanked and people are using it to advertise. So it should be protected? Wouldn't you agree? After all, it is very informative (other
Pokemon articles should be written on the other online games) and I found it
260:
Should we think that the creator of this article is a spammer because someone ELSE came on and linked it to a fraud website? Absolutely no. As the community of
Knowledge (XXG), we should support our user community, and not be swayed by the careless actions of others interested in only their own
305:
Being illegal or a COI is not a reason to delete. However I found a lot of Google hits on many different web sites including game review places. This suggests that it is notable enough to have an article here. I declined deleting it as a spam, and considered that more debate was needed before
294:
Article for
Pokemon Mmos Therefore they are NOTABLE, but they have taken vandalism precautions (because we can see that 117.194.4.239 spammed AGAIN and afterwards they prevented vandalism). PLUS "This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the
346:- web content with no indication of importance. Web search for "Pokémon Moon" shows a mire of forum and blog chatter. Perhaps Graeme can link to some of the reviews that he found. Otherwise, I can't see any indication of it passing the general notability guideline.
256:
Again, if another more “important” article was vandalised, would that be deleted? Are we saying that less important articles don’t matter? No, and according to
Knowledge (XXG)’s policy just because vandals damaged an article, it shouldn’t be marked for deletion!
371:
of this MMO. I'm not even going to address the fundamentally-flawed argument above, as no-one here even mentioned spam as a reason for deletion (However, I do agree with Graeme
Bartlett's reason for declining the speedy).
325:
Completely non-notable. It is a Pokémon MMORPG. If we let this slide, then alot more will be made. Most of which will be made by some sort of staff member of the project. Which is against guidelines. --
295:
coverage of video games on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks."
288:
We can see here: Shadowjams- requests for speedy deletion Graeme
Bartlett- Cleans and not spam IP 117.194.4.239 vandalises this article Tpewebmaster vandalises this article
123:
234:
205:
Personally, I think the now-defunct
Pokemon test applies to this. Kind of because it's also Pokemon-related, but also because there could be a
253:
listen to ridiculous ads. It's about US not THEM! And I see that BEFORE the vandalism, someone actually marked this article not as spam.
271:
405:
90:
85:
94:
17:
77:
445:
36:
311:
444:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
430:
409:
376:
355:
334:
315:
279:
241:
222:
200:
183:
169:
139:
59:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
275:
401:
267:
426:
135:
351:
307:
210:
81:
343:
397:
396:
a valid reason to delete an article unless there are no non-vandalous edits in the edit history.
373:
330:
238:
159:
422:
218:
196:
131:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
389:
347:
368:
178:
385:
364:
73:
65:
55:
418:
326:
149:
214:
192:
111:
291:
50:
148:
Unnotable fan made game, violates notability guidelines, and possibly COI.
421:
and, as stated, vandalism is evidence of vandalism, not notability. ~
286:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Pokémon_Moon&action=history
438:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
249:
helpful. After all, there IS an article on
Pokemon PC games.
285:
118:
107:
103:
99:
261:benefit. Let’s be a team and stop that vandalism!
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
448:). No further edits should be made to this page.
235:list of video game related deletion discussions
130:Non-notable internet game. Speedy declined.
8:
292:http://en.wikipedia.org/Pokémon_games_for_PC
306:eliminating because of lack of notability.
233:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
417:- Fails pretty much every test at
388:as stated above. On another note,
24:
191:unnotable, and somewhat illegal.
1:
209:of these somewhere (e.g. the
465:
365:reliable secondary sources
441:Please do not modify it.
431:04:28, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
410:23:01, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
377:17:22, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
356:16:11, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
335:14:10, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
316:06:49, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
280:06:22, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
242:04:20, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
223:16:42, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
201:02:14, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
184:10:35, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
170:01:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
140:01:07, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
60:07:20, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
363:– I could not find any
367:that can display any
264:By That Anonymouse
211:Pokemon games for PC
44:The result was
342:- possibly under
270:comment added by
244:
168:
456:
443:
386:reliable sources
282:
229:
166:
163:Its over 9000!!!
158:
156:
121:
115:
97:
34:
464:
463:
459:
458:
457:
455:
454:
453:
452:
446:deletion review
439:
308:Graeme Bartlett
265:
160:
150:
117:
88:
72:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
462:
460:
451:
450:
434:
433:
412:
379:
358:
337:
319:
318:
272:139.168.34.123
246:
245:
227:
226:
225:
186:
172:
128:
127:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
461:
449:
447:
442:
436:
435:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
413:
411:
407:
406:contributions
403:
399:
398:Haipa Doragon
395:
391:
387:
383:
380:
378:
375:
370:
366:
362:
359:
357:
353:
349:
345:
341:
338:
336:
332:
328:
324:
321:
320:
317:
313:
309:
304:
301:
300:
299:
298:
293:
289:
287:
283:
281:
277:
273:
269:
262:
258:
254:
250:
243:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
203:
202:
198:
194:
190:
187:
185:
182:
181:
176:
173:
171:
167:
165:
164:
157:
155:
154:
147:
146:Speedy Delete
144:
143:
142:
141:
137:
133:
125:
120:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
440:
437:
414:
393:
384:per lack of
381:
360:
339:
322:
302:
296:
290:
284:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
230:
206:
188:
179:
174:
162:
161:
152:
151:
145:
132:TexasAndroid
129:
74:Pokémon Moon
66:Pokémon Moon
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
348:Marasmusine
297:So not spam
266:—Preceding
177:per above.
369:notability
180:Greg Tyler
390:vandalism
344:Speedy A7
374:MuZemike
268:unsigned
239:MuZemike
153:DBZROCKS
124:View log
215:Ansh666
213:page).
193:Ansh666
91:protect
86:history
415:Delete
382:Delete
361:Delete
340:Delete
323:Delete
189:Delete
175:Delete
119:delete
95:delete
46:delete
423:Amory
327:Blake
122:) – (
112:views
104:watch
100:links
16:<
427:talk
419:WP:N
402:talk
352:talk
331:talk
312:talk
303:Keep
276:talk
231:Note
219:talk
207:list
197:talk
136:talk
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
56:talk
51:Cirt
394:not
392:is
429:)
408:)
404:•
354:)
333:)
314:)
278:)
237:.
221:)
199:)
138:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
58:)
48:.
425:(
400:(
350:(
329:(
310:(
274:(
217:(
195:(
134:(
126:)
116:(
114:)
76:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.