224:- this applies to all of the Polish Top 50 nominations. The underlying concept of the top hits in Poland seems notable enough to warrant a page. Moreover, a website may well be a reliable enough source for this sort of data; that the compilers of the Polish Top 50 have a cheesy looking website on home.planet.nl is neither here nor there. If this site gets a data feed from another source, that source should be cited though, if available. I do think that the several pages about Polish hits ought to merge into one.
48:. I'm going to treat these articles as one, more or less, and reach a decision about their disposition on that basis. There is not a consensus to delete all these articles in these debates. However, the debaters here have not done due diligence and examined how we have disposed of the same question for other, perhaps more established, chart listings. For example, we have things like
251:- I think the article is notable - if it is completely re-written to actually explain the history and methodology of the Polish music charts (article needs categories too). As it stands now its definitely a copyright violation as its probably updated every week with the current top ten by a music chart fan
196:
Not referenced to anything but homepage looking webpage. Likely OR, using
Knowledge (XXG) to advertise non-notable project/website, or using Knowledge (XXG) as web hosting service. And non-notable project list of 50 whatevers is not notable, either. Creator has removed prod tags. Note this is one of
60:(US) and so on, a very encyclopedic treatment of the topic that rises above an obsessive listing that changes every few days - an approach that would be unsuitable for an archive of knowledge. This aspect is dealt with by the articles such as
320:
assuming these can be verified as really being the Polish charts. If that's the case, they'd be a list of songs achieving a significant thing. The claims of "wikicruft" are very odd.
189:
365:
I don't know, and no reference other than creator's claims like below has been presented for or against. In essence, there is nothing disproving it is not a
162:
157:
166:
104:
I would recommend to those maintaining these articles that they get a very clear view of what is obsessive cruft and what is encyclopedia material. -
149:
69:
17:
94:
90:
86:
197:
the four similar articles found and nominated at AfD. PS. Please note that the creator of those articles responded to this AfD by
65:
61:
443:
36:
428:
416:
404:
383:
360:
347:
328:
311:
297:
278:
259:
238:
215:
130:
112:
153:
442:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
307:
article needs to be re-written but why are articles with lists of #1 hits in Poland nominated for deletion???
397:
304:
145:
137:
79:
119:
293:
101:
it, and recommend that a template navbox be created to go at the bottom of the surviving articles.
376:
340:
271:
231:
208:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
366:
357:
325:
127:
109:
49:
97:
is pointless as it stands, and might have more utility about 10 years from now, so I shall
413:
53:
352:
In that case, is there an authentic Polish singles chart we can source information from?
289:
256:
401:
308:
372:
336:
267:
227:
204:
183:
353:
321:
235:
123:
105:
425:
234:
on the charts, I am mighty glad not to have to listen to Polish radio. -
255:
those images can't possibly adhere to any fair use/image guidelines. -
57:
288:. I doubt if this is notable. It looks like wikicruft with copyvio.
436:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
198:
179:
175:
171:
412:: eminently unencyclopedic, verging on advertising.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
446:). No further edits should be made to this page.
95:List of Polish National Top 50 number-one hits
91:Polish National Top 50 number-one hits of 2007
87:Polish National Top 50 number-one hits of 2006
333:The only reference is creator's homepage...--
8:
264:Yes, some images are untagged as copyvio.--
122:. Someone should do something about that.
373:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
337:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
268:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
205:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
400:is an official Polish singles chart!
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
70:Number-one dance hits of 2007 (USA)
24:
199:removing those noms from AfD list
66:List of number-one singles (UK)
424:. Not encyclopedic content. --
62:List of number-one albums (UK)
1:
72:and other similar articles.
463:
68:(and its subarticles) and
429:13:50, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
417:16:56, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
405:16:33, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
384:21:21, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
361:22:52, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
348:14:25, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
329:09:24, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
312:21:50, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
298:01:16, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
279:17:07, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
260:16:44, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
239:13:56, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
216:04:10, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
131:14:47, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
113:14:39, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
439:Please do not modify it.
75:I am therefore going to
32:Please do not modify it.
118:Addendum: I just found
398:Polish National Top 50
305:Polish National Top 50
146:Polish National Top 50
138:Polish National Top 50
80:Polish National Top 50
303:Okay, I agree the
232:Justin Timberlake
454:
441:
381:
379:
345:
343:
276:
274:
213:
211:
187:
169:
50:UK Singles Chart
34:
462:
461:
457:
456:
455:
453:
452:
451:
450:
444:deletion review
437:
382:
377:
371:
358:Schreit mich an
346:
341:
335:
326:Schreit mich an
277:
272:
266:
236:Smerdis of Tlön
214:
209:
203:
160:
144:
141:
54:UK Albums Chart
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
460:
458:
449:
448:
432:
431:
419:
407:
392:
391:
390:
389:
388:
387:
386:
370:
334:
301:
300:
283:
282:
281:
265:
242:
202:
194:
193:
140:
135:
134:
133:
120:Template:PNT50
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
459:
447:
445:
440:
434:
433:
430:
427:
423:
420:
418:
415:
411:
408:
406:
403:
399:
396:
393:
385:
380:
374:
368:
364:
363:
362:
359:
355:
351:
350:
349:
344:
338:
332:
331:
330:
327:
323:
319:
316:
315:
314:
313:
310:
306:
299:
295:
291:
287:
284:
280:
275:
269:
263:
262:
261:
258:
254:
250:
246:
243:
241:
240:
237:
233:
229:
223:
220:
219:
218:
217:
212:
206:
200:
191:
185:
181:
177:
173:
168:
164:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
142:
139:
136:
132:
129:
125:
121:
117:
116:
115:
114:
111:
107:
102:
100:
96:
92:
88:
85:
81:
78:
73:
71:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
438:
435:
421:
409:
394:
317:
302:
285:
252:
248:
244:
228:Gwen Stefani
225:
221:
195:
103:
98:
83:
76:
74:
45:
43:
31:
28:
46:COMPLICATED
414:Biruitorul
290:Appleseed
402:Addie555
309:Addie555
190:View log
367:WP:HOAX
249:Comment
222:Comment
163:protect
158:history
58:Pop 100
422:Delete
410:Delete
354:BigHaz
322:BigHaz
286:Delete
167:delete
124:Splash
106:Splash
99:DELETE
93:. The
82:, and
77:DELETE
378:talk
369:...--
342:talk
273:talk
226:With
210:talk
184:views
176:watch
172:links
16:<
426:Lysy
395:Keep
318:Keep
294:Talk
247:and
245:Keep
230:and
180:logs
154:talk
150:edit
89:and
84:KEEP
56:and
52:and
253:and
188:– (
356:-
324:-
296:)
257:eo
182:|
178:|
174:|
170:|
165:|
161:|
156:|
152:|
128:tk
126:-
110:tk
108:-
64:,
375:|
339:|
292:(
270:|
207:|
201:.
192:)
186:)
148:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.