303:? Are they talking about the same thing when they use the same phrase (which seems necessary if we are to say that they are working on the same thing)? And why isn't their thought best described in the articles on them? The article as written is not about a theme in anyone's thought, however, but rather asserts the existence of something called "political society" about whose essence we can have a discussion. The last time this article was created, it served as a
414:
Thanks for letting us know. This is useful information, and I am agreeing with you that the current material needs to go. I am not convinced, however, that we shouldn't have a page on this. I see that John Locke uses the phrase synomymously with "civil society", but what about the other source I
282:
also uses the phrase "political society," but synonymously with civil society, society, and civil government, and in opposition to the state of nature; his usage is captured by the other articles. The questions for me seem to be, In whose thought is this a central enough term to warrant an
154:
Recreation of a deleted page on a non-notable term. This page was recreated with substantially the same claims made in the previous iterations, viz. that political society is a notable term of art used by Alexis de
Tocqueville that is not already covered by the article on
532:
problem is that it is in use by many scholars and they ascribe to it an importance and a specific meaning. it is completely different from this old outdated chap Locke, but very similar to modern thought of
Tocqueville and Marx. shouldn't it be complemented rather?
335:
Aren't the citations included a third-party coverage that exclude also possibility of original research? It is also not true that
Tocqueville did not describe the term - his direct de~finition of it is present in the reference to Schleifer.
283:
independent article rather than a dictionary entry? and Why is that idea not better addressed in the articles on those people? Concerning the Marx link, the hosting site for that reference does not include "political society" in its
86:
81:
258:. I'm sorry if my nomination was brief; I probably assumed too much of the past discussions. The phrase "political society" occurs often—the question is whether it is a special term not already covered by
364:
Another newly created account contributing to the discussion. This one's already been banned (username violation), so I'm not going to submit it for checkuser unless this AfD ends in keep.
391:
315:); the latest version bears these same hallmarks, down to the references to Tocqueville. This article has been deleted twice already with no new arguments offered for its recreation.
76:
557:
147:
274:, but Tocqueville does not describe it or suggest that it is a special term; it does not appear in the subject index of Mansfield and Winthrop's translation of
435:. That one seems like a synonym for politics: "the place where public demands get tackled by specific political institutions."
352:
299:
use "political society" in a technical sense, but who has responded to their work in such a way as to satisfy the third-party coverage requirement of
235:
390:
The user that recreated this page has since been identified as a sockpuppet of the now-banned user who created this page twice in the past; see
114:
109:
118:
612:
590:
542:
525:
496:
450:
427:
409:
379:
356:
330:
250:
212:
174:
101:
59:
17:
481:
but already banned. The only comments friendly to the article's retention are by Cazort, who has not affirmed an opinion of keep.
627:
556:). Because a now-banned user re-created this page and has already engaged in this discussion with sockpuppets, I have
36:
553:
348:
470:
344:
416:
222:
208:
185:
159:. It is not, and the contention that it is seems to rely upon a mistranslation from French to Polish to English.
584:
569:
490:
444:
403:
373:
324:
168:
626:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
608:
466:
105:
50:
340:
300:
190:
198:
204:
538:
304:
225:
292:
97:
65:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
474:
423:
312:
246:
267:
308:
455:
Except the fact that political society is a place, sphere, part of social world while
521:
459:
a process that may not occur in political society. It is a term of wider meaning.
135:
604:
419:
296:
242:
224:
What do you have to say about this source? Here's another interesting source:
186:
http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/t/tocqueville/alexis/democracy/book1.html#book1.6
534:
478:
279:
288:
284:
278:, contrary to expectations were it a special term that Tocqueville used.
270:. The phrase does indeed appear in the titles of a chapter and a part in
577:
562:
516:
483:
456:
437:
396:
366:
317:
259:
161:
156:
263:
228:
191:
http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/t/tocqueville/alexis/democracy/book4.html
230:. Heck, look at the 34,000+ google scholar hits for the exact phrase
199:
http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1843/critique-hpr/ch05.htm
620:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
552:
Wer34 is a new user with few edits outside of this discussion (
514:
as a non-specific phrase or, optionally, move to wiktionary.
392:
Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/Discourseur/Archive
291:; it does not seem to be an important term in his thought.
87:
Articles for deletion/Political society (3rd nomination)
82:
Articles for deletion/Political society (2nd nomination)
142:
131:
127:
123:
287:, nor does the phrase appear at all in the article on
241:but I am uncertain and want more discussion first.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
630:). No further edits should be made to this page.
603:, Knowledge (XXG) is not a dictionary. Per DGG.
575:15:23, 6 May 2009 (UTC) — Update: confirmed.
182:are you providing others with true facts rjc?
8:
418:. That seems to be a more specific use?
221:The first hit in google is interesting:
473:, who is probably also a suckpuppet of
77:Articles for deletion/Political society
74:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
72:
24:
1:
647:
465:This comment was made by
623:Please do not modify it.
613:08:54, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
60:10:53, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
591:20:16, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
543:11:41, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
526:22:07, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
497:15:21, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
451:22:36, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
428:13:25, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
410:09:37, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
380:20:16, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
357:16:57, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
331:01:39, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
251:00:27, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
237:I am leaning towards a
213:23:11, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
175:22:34, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
311:by a now-banned user (
71:AfDs for this article:
558:requested a checkuser
471:Americanazifrommunich
345:Americanazifrommunich
276:Democracy in America
272:Democracy in America
469:, a sockpuppet of
467:Americanazinmunich
44:The result was
593:
382:
360:
343:comment added by
309:original research
293:Partha Chatterjee
232:Political society
98:Political society
66:Political society
638:
625:
587:
580:
572:
565:
551:
493:
486:
447:
440:
406:
399:
376:
369:
363:
359:
337:
327:
320:
285:Marxist glossary
227:. Or this one:
171:
164:
145:
139:
121:
56:
53:
34:
646:
645:
641:
640:
639:
637:
636:
635:
634:
628:deletion review
621:
589:
585:
578:
574:
570:
563:
495:
491:
484:
449:
445:
438:
408:
404:
397:
388:Additional Note
378:
374:
367:
338:
329:
325:
318:
268:state of nature
173:
169:
162:
141:
112:
96:
93:
91:
69:
54:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
644:
642:
633:
632:
616:
615:
597:
596:
595:
594:
583:
568:
546:
545:
529:
528:
508:
507:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
489:
453:
443:
402:
385:
384:
383:
372:
333:
323:
179:
167:
152:
151:
92:
90:
89:
84:
79:
73:
70:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
643:
631:
629:
624:
618:
617:
614:
610:
606:
602:
599:
598:
592:
588:
582:
581:
573:
567:
566:
559:
555:
554:contributions
550:
549:
548:
547:
544:
540:
536:
531:
530:
527:
523:
519:
518:
513:
510:
509:
498:
494:
488:
487:
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
461:
460:
458:
454:
452:
448:
442:
441:
434:
431:
430:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
412:
411:
407:
401:
400:
393:
389:
386:
381:
377:
371:
370:
362:
361:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
334:
332:
328:
322:
321:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
254:
253:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
233:
229:
226:
223:
220:
217:
216:
215:
214:
210:
206:
201:
200:
196:
193:
192:
188:
187:
183:
180:
177:
176:
172:
166:
165:
158:
149:
144:
137:
133:
129:
125:
120:
116:
111:
107:
103:
99:
95:
94:
88:
85:
83:
80:
78:
75:
67:
64:
62:
61:
58:
57:
55:Postlethwaite
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
622:
619:
600:
576:
561:
515:
511:
482:
462:
436:
432:
395:
387:
365:
316:
275:
271:
255:
238:
231:
218:
202:
197:
194:
189:
184:
181:
178:
160:
153:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
475:Discourseur
339:—Preceding
313:Discourseur
297:Doug Bandow
195:and search
463:Sockpuppet
457:politicsis
301:notability
280:John Locke
289:Karl Marx
266:, or the
586:Contribs
571:Contribs
492:Contribs
446:Contribs
405:Contribs
375:Contribs
353:contribs
341:unsigned
326:Contribs
260:politics
170:Contribs
157:Politics
148:View log
305:POVFORK
264:society
219:Comment
115:protect
110:history
605:Stifle
601:Delete
512:Delete
420:Cazort
415:gave:
243:Cazort
143:delete
119:delete
46:delete
535:Wer34
479:Wer34
433:Reply
256:Reply
146:) – (
136:views
128:watch
124:links
16:<
609:talk
539:talk
522:talk
424:talk
349:talk
307:for
295:and
247:talk
239:Keep
209:talk
205:Żęść
132:logs
106:talk
102:edit
52:Ryan
579:RJC
564:RJC
517:DGG
485:RJC
439:RJC
398:RJC
394:.
368:RJC
319:RJC
163:RJC
611:)
560:.
541:)
533:--
524:)
426:)
355:)
351:•
262:,
249:)
234::
211:)
203:--
134:|
130:|
126:|
122:|
117:|
113:|
108:|
104:|
48:.
607:(
537:(
520:(
477:/
422:(
347:(
245:(
207:(
150:)
140:(
138:)
100:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.