181:. What criteria for deletion does this satisfy? It's verifiable. Independent and reputable references are cited. It's not an advert - in fact, it's a textbook example of NPOV, reporting facts without making value judgements, sourcing all claims, and identifying the one case where the source has a conflict of interest. It's bitty and needs cleaning up, but that is not a criterion for deletion. The company is not of world-shattering notability, but does satisfy the
136:
I disagree. Even if that were true, the company could only be said to have met one of those criteria - "The company or corporation has been the subject of multiple published works". If it were the subject of those two minor Wall Street
Journal articles, I would say that Pop-a-Lock had met the letter,
141:
criteria - which are only intended as "rough guidelines". However, Pop-A-Lock isn't really the subject of those articles at all. The articles are both about franchises
161:: The article does not appear to be an advertisement. For example, it states that a background check of the company's franchisees revealed that one was guilty of "
100:
145:; Pop-a-Lock just happens to be prominently mentioned. This article has in no way established sufficient notability for inclusion in Knowledge.
17:
105:
244:
36:
243:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
95:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
170:
229:
215:
202:
173:
153:
131:
108:
86:
73:
57:
115:
52:
63:
198:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
162:
150:
212:
70:
208:
182:
138:
120:
83:
49:
94:
and then go back in time and keep the ad from ever being placed. Destroy all ads. --
226:
186:
194:
128:
237:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
165:." I am uncertain on the notability of the company, though.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
247:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
193:this article meet the deletion criteria? —
113:Research turns up two articles in the
7:
24:
211:guidelines does it meet exactly?
82:. Nothing but an advertisement.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
44:The result of the debate was
230:23:57, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
216:01:32, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
203:12:52, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
174:22:06, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
154:16:28, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
132:11:10, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
109:06:28, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
87:05:28, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
74:01:37, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
58:07:51, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
137:but not the spirit, of the
264:
240:Please do not modify it.
123:criteria are satisfied.
32:Please do not modify it.
225:-- as per Haeleth --
96:Jeffrey O. Gustafson
119:for starters. The
116:Wall Street Journal
201:
171:TantalumTelluride
55:
255:
242:
197:
163:grand theft auto
53:
48:(no consensus).
34:
263:
262:
258:
257:
256:
254:
253:
252:
251:
245:deletion review
238:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
261:
259:
250:
249:
233:
232:
220:
219:
218:
189:paper. So how
176:
156:
134:
111:
89:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
260:
248:
246:
241:
235:
234:
231:
228:
224:
221:
217:
214:
210:
206:
205:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
177:
175:
172:
168:
164:
160:
157:
155:
152:
148:
144:
140:
135:
133:
130:
126:
122:
118:
117:
112:
110:
107:
103:
102:
97:
93:
90:
88:
85:
81:
78:
77:
76:
75:
72:
65:
62:
60:
59:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
239:
236:
222:
190:
178:
166:
158:
146:
142:
124:
114:
99:
91:
79:
68:
45:
43:
31:
28:
151:TheMadBaron
213:Flapdragon
183:guidelines
106:<*: -->
71:Flapdragon
64:Pop-a-Lock
143:generally
84:Devotchka
50:Sjakkalle
227:Geo Swan
101:Shazaam!
54:(Check!)
209:WP:CORP
195:Haeleth
167:Neutral
159:Comment
139:WP:CORP
129:Uncle G
121:WP:CORP
69:advert
207:Which
187:WP:NOT
185:, and
147:Delete
92:Delete
80:Delete
16:<
223:keep
199:Talk
191:does
179:Keep
125:Keep
46:keep
169:--
149:.
127:.
104:-
98:-
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.