356:. There is nothing out there that shows 100% that this is either real or fake. It looks like enough people had taken the site seriously when it was initially announced to where even if it is a joke website, some uploaded clips without the intention of actually providing audio narration for blind people while others clearly meant for the clips to be used for that purpose. However here's the big issue: despite claims that the website was launched back in 2006/2007, the site really only gained notice in 2008 when it was first announced to exist. Other than one or two brief articles that came out a short period of time later (as in 1 paragraph type articles), the website has attracted no further attention. I also notice that its Alexa rank is rather low for any type of website, but especially a pornography website, although I know that this isn't in itself a reason to delete. Why I mention that is because it looks like the site got a brief spate of articles in 2008 that announced it exists and was then largely ignored by the world in general. There is
257:. This would probably be hard to speedy as a hoax. It sounds like the kind of thing that was clearly created as a gag website (no sexual pun intended), which means that the website is not real as far as its intended purpose as a sex website for blind people. However the website itself does/did exist as a joke website, so it's not really a hoax because it did exist in some format. It just isn't what the article is currently trying to describe. Of course this doesn't mean that it should exist on Knowledge (XXG), just that AfD is probably the best way to go about talking about whether or not this passes notability guidelines. One thing for incoming editors to take into consideration is that if the site only got initial attention that talks about it as if it's a legitimate site, that's probably a good sign that it doesn't have any lasting notability.
221:
sources, making their reliability questionable.). This is not listed in any charity database. The website has not been updated since 2009 (see copyright on site). The Whois traces to a student's dorm room. If you play some of the mp3 files of the supposed "porn" for the blind, you'll hear 2 guys laughing in the background 1/2 the time. I do not know / understand how this survived as long as it has. There are some useful old comments from the AFD from 4 years ago (it does not conform to
334:
Yes, there is the
Canadian artist and also there is an Irish rock band with the same name. So, thanks for pointing out the potential false positives for other editors. The main issues are pointed out well on the 2nd nomination...now, with the passag of 4 years we can see that some of the editors
220:
It has been 4-5 years since it was last nominated for deletion. Other editors agreed back then that it was a joke and poorly sourced (2 articles in 2008-9 only & nothing since then). The sources never attempted to verify this was a legitimate site, and only a pseudonym is provided to the
335:
during that vote were wrong about a few things. Thanks for fixing the AFD - I thought I did it right - by pasting the script in the edit summary (after like 3 tries - was embarrassed already) but I guess it was still messed up.
189:
87:
82:
368:. If there were a little more than this could potentially pass, but right now there just isn't enough for me to really think it passes notability guidelines. It's close, but not close enough.
142:
77:
316:. I'm coming up with search results for a Canadian artist that is creating erotic art in braille that is unrelated to the website, so there will be some false positives here.
229:) - please click the links to the right to read more. Nothing has changed since then, and no new sources can be found backing them up as any notable (or legitimate)website.
183:
149:
409:
389:
115:
110:
119:
386:
102:
446:
421:
401:
377:
344:
325:
304:
283:
266:
60:
245:
17:
204:
171:
441:
364:, but neither really seem to suggest that they're the type of long term coverage that would show that this website passes
465:
40:
295:: This contained some text and delete arguments from the 2009 AfD, so I'm removing those comments to avoid confusion.
165:
274:: This didn't show up properly on the AfD, so I did some tweaking to where this would show up properly. Cheers!
161:
106:
233:
340:
241:
211:
461:
438:
373:
321:
300:
279:
262:
98:
66:
36:
361:
197:
177:
417:
397:
336:
237:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
460:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
434:
369:
317:
296:
275:
258:
365:
222:
226:
413:
393:
54:
136:
357:
360:(unsure if this is just a random contributor or a staff writer, though) and
454:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
88:
Articles for deletion/Porn for the Blind (3rd nomination)
83:
Articles for deletion/Porn for the Blind (2nd nomination)
132:
128:
124:
196:
210:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
468:). No further edits should be made to this page.
410:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
8:
408:Note: This debate has been included in the
407:
385:Note: This debate has been added to the
78:Articles for deletion/Porn for the Blind
75:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
73:
24:
1:
447:21:30, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
422:13:47, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
402:13:45, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
378:05:03, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
345:17:24, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
326:04:31, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
305:04:25, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
284:04:17, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
267:04:23, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
61:23:37, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
485:
432:- Let this turkey die. --
248:) 23:17, 12 December 2012
457:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
387:WikiProject Pornography
72:AfDs for this article:
362:this German website
99:Porn for the Blind
67:Porn for the Blind
48:The result was
424:
390:list of deletions
358:this Vice article
250:
236:comment added by
476:
459:
445:
444:
404:
249:
230:
215:
214:
200:
152:
140:
122:
57:
34:
484:
483:
479:
478:
477:
475:
474:
473:
472:
466:deletion review
455:
437:
433:
384:
293:Further comment
231:
157:
148:
113:
97:
94:
92:
70:
55:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
482:
480:
471:
470:
450:
449:
426:
425:
405:
381:
380:
350:
349:
348:
347:
329:
328:
310:
309:
308:
307:
287:
286:
269:
218:
217:
154:
93:
91:
90:
85:
80:
74:
71:
69:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
481:
469:
467:
463:
458:
452:
451:
448:
443:
440:
436:
431:
428:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
406:
403:
399:
395:
391:
388:
383:
382:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
352:
351:
346:
342:
338:
333:
332:
331:
330:
327:
323:
319:
315:
312:
311:
306:
302:
298:
294:
291:
290:
289:
288:
285:
281:
277:
273:
270:
268:
264:
260:
256:
253:
252:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
228:
224:
213:
209:
206:
203:
199:
195:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
163:
160:
159:Find sources:
155:
151:
147:
144:
138:
134:
130:
126:
121:
117:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
95:
89:
86:
84:
81:
79:
76:
68:
65:
63:
62:
59:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
456:
453:
429:
353:
337:Angelatomato
313:
292:
271:
254:
238:Angelatomato
232:— Preceding
219:
207:
201:
193:
186:
180:
174:
168:
158:
145:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
435:Sue Rangell
370:Tokyogirl79
354:Weak delete
318:Tokyogirl79
297:Tokyogirl79
276:Tokyogirl79
259:Tokyogirl79
184:free images
314:Additional
462:talk page
414:• Gene93k
394:• Gene93k
37:talk page
464:or in a
246:contribs
234:unsigned
143:View log
39:or in a
272:Comment
255:Comment
190:WP refs
178:scholar
116:protect
111:history
56:MBisanz
430:Delete
366:WP:WEB
223:WP:WEB
162:Google
120:delete
50:delete
227:WP:NN
205:JSTOR
166:books
150:Stats
137:views
129:watch
125:links
16:<
418:talk
398:talk
374:talk
341:talk
322:talk
301:talk
280:talk
263:talk
242:talk
198:FENS
172:news
133:logs
107:talk
103:edit
225:or
212:TWL
141:– (
439:✍
420:)
412:.
400:)
392:.
376:)
343:)
324:)
303:)
282:)
265:)
244:•
192:)
135:|
131:|
127:|
123:|
118:|
114:|
109:|
105:|
52:.
442:✉
416:(
396:(
372:(
339:(
320:(
299:(
278:(
261:(
240:(
216:)
208:·
202:·
194:·
187:·
181:·
175:·
169:·
164:(
156:(
153:)
146:·
139:)
101:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.