287:
I'm not finding a verbatim source for the text here, so I can't document a copyright violation. NuclearWarfare, do you have a link? I'm going to attempt a cleanup, but don't want to go too far if the entire thing will be deleted anyway. It sounds like the subject might be notable, but it's a bit
578:
The discussion at
Deletion Review has been leaning toward keeping t he speedy-deleted article, but edited as necessary. I think that the significance goes beyond just the company to immigration policy generally, and selective enforcement of it in particular, and a spearate article will be
487:, and on the premise that the existing article duplicated a copyrighted source (which seems to be at least partially the case, per above), I put together a stubbed version of this article, which could be expanded - but I see that there is already good coverage at
261:
Coren: Would you care to elaborate on why this is an attack? I may just be missing the obvious at the moment, but this looks like the straight reporting of events. Could not this be solved by renaming the article and other editorial adjustments?
362:
Just as an update, I've done a comparison of the article with that source and found minor infringement in an evident good-faith effort to write in own words. I've got to run--dentist--but wanted to share the outcome of comparing
566:, it is not only the largest raid in Iowa, but "the largest raid of its kind in the nation's history." It's notable well beyond the boundaries of the company involved; it's sourced; it's neutral. Keep, I think. --
506:
Right. The revisions make it look a lot better (good work Ultra). But I'm still questioning whether this should exist on its own. I'll be happy to change to keep in the event its a notable fork.
491:. That has the added bonus of not being a single-event article. So, if a separate article is in order, it should probably be at this title - but if not, that article would be the better choice.
248:; it's still a poorly sourced hatchet job. Maybe an article can be made out of the event, but this is not it. Note that an attack page needs not have a BLP as subject to be an attack page. —
528:
is mostly criticism of the subject - well-sourced, and possibly well-deserved criticism - but, meh. Adding a lot of information about this raid might bump up against giving that criticism
203:
149:
323:
line by line. I have so far substantiated some duplication, but only two sentences. I'll see what else I can find. Meanwhile, the article that this copies is at DRV,
324:
458:. Any collaborative efforts can happen over there. We don't need a separate article on one specific event thats already covered in the main article.
188:
169:
75:
538:
497:
421:
384:
294:
116:
111:
17:
579:
appropriate. Otherwise the purely political aspects will overbalance the main article and make it even harder to get NPOV there..
120:
157:
My G12 speedy delete was declined, but I still believe this is a blatant copyright infringement. So, I'll hand it off to you guys.
563:
103:
430:
That one would have been okay, as it was a government release and was sourced. But it's good without it, too. :) Well done! --
227:. But the reason it was deleted, actually does not reflect what is written. This isn't an attack, nor is it a BLP concern.
605:
36:
532:, even though I'm not finding a lot of positive material about that company. On that basis, a fork might be in order.
364:
320:
378:
Much appreciated - concur that everything appears to be good faith, and there is some good stuff in there. Thanks,
604:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
184:
165:
71:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
590:
570:
542:
519:
501:
471:
434:
425:
406:
388:
371:
353:
331:
309:
298:
275:
252:
240:
219:
193:
80:
56:
412:
215:
567:
431:
368:
328:
306:
177:
158:
107:
64:
529:
533:
514:
492:
466:
416:
401:
379:
348:
289:
270:
235:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
484:
562:
as well and also looks like a valid "see also" for other articles. According to one of the
63:
Side note - nominator came around to the position of keep after the article was cleaned up
559:
211:
207:
176:
Withdrawing nomination now that it has been cleaned up. Anyone want to perform a close?
555:
525:
488:
480:
455:
99:
91:
586:
554:. The article has been beautifully cleaned. It is certainly a notable event within
508:
460:
395:
342:
264:
229:
137:
411:
It looks like the long bit in the middle discussing case dispositions came from
249:
53:
581:
598:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
305:
One possible source now linked in my comment, below yours. --
144:
133:
129:
125:
204:
Postville Iowa Raid (Agriprocessors Kosher Meat Plant)
202:, verbatim recreation of previously speed-deleted
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
608:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
558:, but it seems to have had a huge impact on
50:Disclaimer: Closer had suggested deletion.
48:; article cleaned up really nicely.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
206:. Cached version of deleted page
24:
1:
288:unclear - thus, the cleanup.
591:18:59, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
571:16:24, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
543:13:53, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
520:13:43, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
502:13:34, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
472:13:25, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
435:16:24, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
426:14:23, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
407:13:52, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
389:13:51, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
372:13:46, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
354:13:03, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
332:13:01, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
310:13:02, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
299:12:52, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
276:12:35, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
253:12:31, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
241:06:57, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
220:06:49, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
194:16:51, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
174:06:33, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
81:00:06, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
57:23:38, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
625:
393:(ec) Ditto. Most helpful.
319:I am comparing this with
601:Please do not modify it.
415:, an ICE press release.
340:Thank you for the link.
32:Please do not modify it.
524:Yeah, now I'm torn...
365:those two, at least
44:The result was
541:
500:
424:
387:
297:
51:
616:
603:
537:
517:
511:
496:
469:
463:
420:
404:
398:
383:
351:
345:
293:
273:
267:
238:
232:
180:
161:
147:
141:
123:
67:
49:
34:
624:
623:
619:
618:
617:
615:
614:
613:
612:
606:deletion review
599:
560:Postville, Iowa
515:
509:
467:
461:
402:
396:
349:
343:
271:
265:
236:
230:
191:
178:
172:
159:
143:
114:
98:
95:
83:
78:
65:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
622:
620:
611:
610:
594:
593:
573:
568:Moonriddengirl
564:linked sources
556:Agriprocessors
549:
548:
547:
546:
545:
526:Agriprocessors
489:Agriprocessors
481:Agriprocessors
474:
456:Agriprocessors
448:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
432:Moonriddengirl
375:
374:
369:Moonriddengirl
357:
356:
335:
334:
329:Moonriddengirl
313:
312:
307:Moonriddengirl
302:
301:
281:
280:
279:
278:
256:
255:
243:
222:
189:
179:NuclearWarfare
170:
160:NuclearWarfare
154:
153:
100:Postville Raid
94:
92:Postville Raid
89:
87:
85:
84:
76:
66:NuclearWarfare
62:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
621:
609:
607:
602:
596:
595:
592:
588:
584:
583:
577:
574:
572:
569:
565:
561:
557:
553:
550:
544:
540:
535:
531:
527:
523:
522:
521:
518:
513:
512:
505:
504:
503:
499:
494:
490:
486:
482:
478:
475:
473:
470:
465:
464:
457:
453:
450:
449:
436:
433:
429:
428:
427:
423:
418:
414:
410:
409:
408:
405:
400:
399:
392:
391:
390:
386:
381:
377:
376:
373:
370:
366:
361:
360:
359:
358:
355:
352:
347:
346:
339:
338:
337:
336:
333:
330:
326:
322:
318:
315:
314:
311:
308:
304:
303:
300:
296:
291:
286:
283:
282:
277:
274:
269:
268:
260:
259:
258:
257:
254:
251:
247:
244:
242:
239:
234:
233:
226:
223:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
198:
197:
196:
195:
192:
187:
186:
185:
181:
175:
173:
168:
167:
166:
162:
151:
146:
139:
135:
131:
127:
122:
118:
113:
109:
105:
101:
97:
96:
93:
90:
88:
82:
79:
74:
73:
72:
68:
61:
60:
59:
58:
55:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
600:
597:
580:
575:
551:
534:UltraExactZZ
530:undue weight
507:
493:UltraExactZZ
476:
459:
451:
417:UltraExactZZ
394:
380:UltraExactZZ
341:
316:
290:UltraExactZZ
284:
263:
245:
228:
224:
199:
183:
182:
164:
163:
156:
155:
86:
70:
69:
45:
43:
31:
28:
321:the source
212:Mr. Vernon
539:Evidence
498:Evidence
477:Redirect
452:Redirect
422:Evidence
385:Evidence
295:Evidence
150:View log
485:WP:BOLD
317:Comment
285:Comment
225:Comment
190:My work
171:My work
117:protect
112:history
77:My work
483:. Per
246:Speedy
200:Delete
145:delete
121:delete
250:Coren
148:) – (
138:views
130:watch
126:links
54:Coren
16:<
587:talk
576:Keep
552:Keep
516:ergy
468:ergy
413:here
403:ergy
367:. --
350:ergy
327:. --
325:here
272:ergy
237:ergy
216:talk
210:. --
208:here
134:logs
108:talk
104:edit
46:Keep
582:DGG
510:Syn
479:to
462:Syn
454:to
397:Syn
344:Syn
266:Syn
231:Syn
589:)
218:)
136:|
132:|
128:|
124:|
119:|
115:|
110:|
106:|
52:—
585:(
536:~
495:~
419:~
382:~
292:~
214:(
152:)
142:(
140:)
102:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.