Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Patrick Smathers - Knowledge

Source đź“ť

324:
Could you put a "fact" tag on those pieces of information in the article which you feel are unsupported at present, so we see what the specific problems are that we need to address? E.g., do you feel it's unsupported that he's a mayor, that he's (not officially, apparently) running for Lt. Gov., that
363:
attribution in the article I think it's a waste of my time to try to improve an article to a by-the-book standard that nobody here actually cares about. I don't waste 30 seconds of time on improving a contested article, because the article often gets canned anyway because of a few people who refuse
144:
He has lots of hits under "Pat Smathers" including a full biography in the Mountaineer of Waynesville, NC of June 26, 2006 available from Highbeam. Please attempt to do some research instead of just the nominating. It takes more time but saves us all time.
358:
No. I'm not interested. As far as I'm concerned, those 6 links demonstrate notability, you seem to be the only one here who doesn't think so, and since I've seen far more notable topics get deleted and far more important topics remaining here with
257:
cleanup then you've got that right, but don't tell me that a mayor running for Lt. Gov doesn't receive significant press coverage. I spent 5 minutes looking and found a photo of him touring a flood site with Sen. Mrs. Dole, on her own webpage.
373:
Nv8200p, sadly, or understandably, I don't jave the time to work on every article that I comment/vote on in AfD discussions, and this one is for sure not worth my time. That, still, doesn't mean it should be deleted ;)
175:
He is fairly notable, somehow I've already heard of him and I'm in Australia. I get the sense he will become very important in the future, perhaps affecting the lives of everyone on this planet.
346:
Great. Why don't you put the references in the article instead of here because the article has to assert his notability not the article for deletion. And the blog doesn't count. -
312:
That the sources seem to be independent from the subject and from reliable established media. That the information in the sources support what is written in the article. -
117: 90: 85: 146: 94: 77: 325:
he graduated from Duke, that he works as an attorney, etc.? If all you want is general proof of mentions in the press, try these:
17: 303:
I hope he reads this and comes back to do so. Can you state, btw, what specifically you will want to review in these sources?
330: 464:. If there are concerns that add an {{politician-stub}} notation or fix the article. It does not need to be deleted. 426: 365: 338: 304: 259: 447: 483: 332: 36: 482:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
468: 452: 414: 378: 368: 353: 341: 326: 319: 307: 298: 279: 262: 237: 194: 179: 165: 149: 135: 59: 227: 81: 334: 215: 54: 209: 176: 408: 336: 328: 350: 316: 295: 191: 132: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
73: 65: 291:
secondary sources. Why don't you add them to the article so they can undergo peer review? -
184: 49: 441: 254: 461: 430: 250: 162: 125: 465: 347: 313: 292: 253:? If you want to complain that it's a partisan article that needs to be tagged for 188: 129: 111: 401:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
375: 276: 154: 435: 212:
has been indefinitely blocked as a single purpose trolling account.
124:
Subject of article does not meet the criteria for notability per
476:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
275:
secondary sources. For the rest, as per AllGloryToTheHypnotoad.
107: 103: 99: 406:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 486:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 271:Google and Yahoo! bring up at least 10 7: 128:. No independent secondary sources. 24: 185:Knowledge is not a crystal ball. 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 429:, and the fact that it passes 147:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 1: 503: 263:22:06, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 238:14:55, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 195:13:24, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 180:12:41, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 166:09:49, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 150:05:47, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 136:05:09, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 60:22:26, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 469:00:52, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 453:23:42, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 415:23:22, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 379:23:53, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 369:15:56, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 354:01:40, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 342:01:01, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 320:16:53, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 308:16:10, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 299:11:29, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 280:08:59, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 208:since posting the above, 479:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 249:- explain how he fails 427:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 366:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 364:to work to consensus. 339:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 305:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 260:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 161:non-trivial sources. 287:I didn't find these 417: 234: 494: 481: 411: 405: 402: 236: 233: 228: 225: 220: 115: 97: 74:Patrick Smathers 66:Patrick Smathers 34: 502: 501: 497: 496: 495: 493: 492: 491: 490: 484:deletion review 477: 409: 400: 229: 221: 216: 213: 88: 72: 69: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 500: 498: 489: 488: 472: 471: 455: 419: 418: 404: 396: 395: 394: 393: 392: 391: 390: 389: 388: 387: 386: 385: 384: 383: 382: 381: 266: 265: 243: 242: 241: 240: 210:User:WunNation 200: 199: 198: 197: 170: 169: 168: 122: 121: 68: 63: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 499: 487: 485: 480: 474: 473: 470: 467: 463: 459: 456: 454: 450: 449: 444: 443: 438: 437: 432: 428: 424: 421: 420: 416: 413: 412: 410:Daniel Bryant 403: 398: 397: 380: 377: 372: 371: 370: 367: 362: 357: 356: 355: 352: 349: 345: 344: 343: 340: 337: 335: 333: 331: 329: 327: 323: 322: 321: 318: 315: 311: 310: 309: 306: 302: 301: 300: 297: 294: 290: 286: 285: 284: 283: 282: 281: 278: 274: 270: 264: 261: 256: 252: 248: 245: 244: 239: 235: 232: 231:(talk to me!) 226: 224: 219: 211: 207: 204: 203: 202: 201: 196: 193: 190: 186: 183: 182: 181: 178: 174: 171: 167: 164: 160: 156: 153: 152: 151: 148: 143: 140: 139: 138: 137: 134: 131: 127: 119: 113: 109: 105: 101: 96: 92: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 70: 67: 64: 62: 61: 58: 57: 53: 52: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 478: 475: 457: 446: 439: 434: 422: 407: 399: 360: 288: 272: 268: 267: 246: 230: 222: 217: 205: 172: 158: 141: 123: 55: 50: 45: 43: 31: 28: 247:strong keep 51:Cbrown1023 460:, passes 289:very good 273:very good 177:WunNation 157:requires 163:TJ Spyke 159:multiple 118:View log 466:meshach 348:Nv8200p 314:Nv8200p 293:Nv8200p 255:WP:NPOV 206:Comment 189:Nv8200p 130:Nv8200p 91:protect 86:history 462:WP:BIO 431:WP:BIO 376:Poeloq 277:Poeloq 251:WP:BIO 218:Irides 126:WP:BIO 95:delete 223:centi 112:views 104:watch 100:links 16:< 458:Keep 436:Sr13 425:per 423:Keep 361:ZERO 351:talk 317:talk 296:talk 269:Keep 192:talk 173:Keep 155:WP:N 142:Keep 133:talk 108:logs 82:talk 78:edit 56:talk 46:Keep 214:- 116:– ( 451:) 433:. 374:-- 145:-- 110:| 106:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 84:| 80:| 48:. 448:C 445:| 442:T 440:( 187:- 120:) 114:) 76:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Cbrown1023
talk
22:26, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Patrick Smathers
Patrick Smathers
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
WP:BIO
Nv8200p
talk
05:09, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )
05:47, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
WP:N
TJ Spyke
09:49, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
WunNation
12:41, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Knowledge is not a crystal ball.
Nv8200p

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑