329:
experience, nor would the paper ask the spokesperson about her personal observations on the treatment of women in the host country. While not deep biographical explorations, these articles are sufficient to demonstrate notability. This is far more coverage than we have for many local politicians or professional athletes.
348:
You admit yourself these are not biographical explorations, if the interviews were on the life of
Patricia Holmes eg how she became a diplomat then that would add to notability, the questions asked in these notability relate to what the Australian government's official position is on various issues
366:
what would make Holmes notable is an actual noted contribution to diplomacy like she led negotiations for a trade agreement or major trade deal, was significantly involved in a major diplomatic dispute, negotiated release of prisoners etc , merely having interviews saying how good the
Australian
328:
An article reporting on the words of a police spokesperson would be unlikely to include her name in the headline. Nor would a reporter interview a spokesperson; reporters tend to interview people who are influential in their own right. Nor would the article describe the spokesperson's career and
313:
none of these sources are about her as a person as correctly pointed out below and add no weight to notability. She is merely being a government spokesperson, like does a police spokesperson reporting in the media about crime make him notable? No.
506:, while nominally about relations between the two countries, also contains non-trivial biographical information on Holmes. I can't read the Spanish language sources, but I think I have to give this one the benefit of the doubt.
169:
200:
fails WP:BIO. The sources merely confirm her role. Those wanting to keep should not just say "ambassadors of major countries are generally notable" but actually find sources to demonstrate WP:BASIC
237:
381:
I propose that you're confusing "importance" with "notability". Notability is not determined by great acts, but by significant coverage in reliable sources, a bar which this subject passes.
527:, then they are notable, period. Since she was also a sub-cabinet foreign office official, and had been at the ambassador rank to several other countries, she easily passes our standards.
163:
479:
293:
295:. I suspect the nominator will claim that these references don't count, because they're related to her role as ambassador, but such a claim would not be supported by policy.
217:
287:
122:
257:
400:
She's not the subject of this coverage, yes she is being interviewed but that is to determine the
Australian Government position, not the life and career of Holmes.
129:
95:
90:
99:
418:
The references suggested above contain virtually no material on Ms Holmes as a person: they're interviews focused on
Australia's relationship with Argentina.
82:
284:
184:
151:
290:
17:
461:
I'm sure the closing admin will take this into account in the absence of you supplying no actual sources to establish notability.
145:
86:
349:
relating to
Argentina. If we replaced Holmes with another ambassador you'd get very similar answers, ie the official line.
536:
510:
491:
470:
452:
435:
409:
390:
376:
358:
338:
323:
304:
269:
249:
229:
209:
141:
64:
419:
503:
281:
555:
523:- ambassadors are typically though of as 'usually' notable, as with mayors of large cities. If the subject would pass
40:
191:
78:
70:
443:. Sorry LibStar, but I'm going to once again say that ambassadors are notable by virtue of their position. --
422:
is a notable topic and those references might be useful in expanding it, but Ms Holmes isn't likely to meet
157:
551:
36:
520:
487:
448:
59:
177:
532:
466:
405:
372:
354:
319:
265:
245:
225:
205:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
550:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
431:
386:
334:
300:
524:
423:
483:
444:
53:
507:
367:
economy is and the usual "we want to cooperate more with your country" doesn't cut it.
528:
462:
401:
368:
350:
315:
261:
241:
221:
201:
116:
427:
382:
330:
296:
544:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
238:
list of
Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions
112:
108:
104:
176:
280:. Plenty of in-depth coverage in reliable sources.
190:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
558:). No further edits should be made to this page.
480:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
218:list of Australia-related deletion discussions
8:
478:Note: This debate has been included in the
256:Note: This debate has been included in the
236:Note: This debate has been included in the
216:Note: This debate has been included in the
258:list of People-related deletion discussions
477:
255:
235:
215:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
420:Argentina-Australia relations
575:
79:Patricia Holmes (diplomat)
71:Patricia Holmes (diplomat)
547:Please do not modify it.
537:14:11, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
511:08:33, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
492:10:43, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
471:11:43, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
453:10:43, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
436:22:53, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
410:15:02, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
391:14:51, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
377:14:25, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
359:14:02, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
339:13:52, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
324:03:37, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
305:20:11, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
270:18:36, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
250:18:36, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
230:18:36, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
210:14:00, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
65:03:33, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
48:The result was
494:
272:
252:
232:
566:
549:
195:
194:
180:
132:
120:
102:
62:
56:
34:
574:
573:
569:
568:
567:
565:
564:
563:
562:
556:deletion review
545:
137:
128:
93:
77:
74:
60:
54:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
572:
570:
561:
560:
540:
539:
514:
496:
495:
475:
474:
473:
456:
455:
438:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
308:
307:
274:
273:
253:
233:
198:
197:
134:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
571:
559:
557:
553:
548:
542:
541:
538:
534:
530:
526:
522:
518:
515:
512:
509:
505:
501:
498:
497:
493:
489:
485:
481:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
459:
458:
457:
454:
450:
446:
442:
439:
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
417:
414:
413:
412:
411:
407:
403:
392:
388:
384:
380:
379:
378:
374:
370:
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
360:
356:
352:
340:
336:
332:
327:
326:
325:
321:
317:
312:
311:
310:
309:
306:
302:
298:
294:
291:
288:
285:
282:
279:
276:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
254:
251:
247:
243:
239:
234:
231:
227:
223:
219:
214:
213:
212:
211:
207:
203:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
63:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
546:
543:
516:
504:this article
499:
440:
415:
399:
347:
277:
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
125:
49:
47:
31:
28:
521:WP:OUTCOMES
164:free images
484:Necrothesp
445:Necrothesp
55:Guerillero
552:talk page
508:Lankiveil
500:Weak Keep
262:• Gene93k
242:• Gene93k
222:• Gene93k
37:talk page
554:or in a
123:View log
39:or in a
529:Bearian
463:LibStar
402:LibStar
369:LibStar
351:LibStar
316:LibStar
202:LibStar
170:WP refs
158:scholar
96:protect
91:history
61:My Talk
525:WP:GNG
428:Nick-D
424:WP:BIO
416:Delete
383:Pburka
331:Pburka
297:Pburka
142:Google
100:delete
185:JSTOR
146:books
130:Stats
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
533:talk
519:per
517:Keep
488:talk
467:talk
449:talk
441:Keep
432:talk
406:talk
387:talk
373:talk
355:talk
335:talk
320:talk
301:talk
278:Keep
266:talk
246:talk
226:talk
206:talk
178:FENS
152:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
50:keep
192:TWL
121:– (
535:)
502:,
490:)
482:.
469:)
451:)
434:)
426:.
408:)
389:)
375:)
357:)
337:)
322:)
303:)
292:,
289:,
286:,
268:)
260:.
248:)
240:.
228:)
220:.
208:)
172:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
58:|
52:.
531:(
513:.
486:(
465:(
447:(
430:(
404:(
385:(
371:(
353:(
333:(
318:(
299:(
283:,
264:(
244:(
224:(
204:(
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
126:·
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.