719:
sound approach, could produce porn, traded up today around the world as a classic. Finally came the gentry usually from the film industry and brought with them for this reason some decades of experience. Already in the first years were not only short films, known as loops, produced, but also porn feature film length. It was set free the imagination, concerning the content and also the title of the film. Just the title of old movies were like to cast off and used in many short films. But there were already existing stories and movies where one content served. It was to the fabric around the figure of the "Sanitätsgefreiten"Neumann, on the other hand, it was the figure of the literary classics of porn "Josefine
Mutzenbacher" which was already some years before, just like the "Sanitätsgefreite Neumann" in a sex film release in theaters. This substance, which tells of a Viennese whore, and which caused much sensation and censorship in book form, has offered wonderful to, to be filmed as a pornographic Variant.
628:; the two porn databases used as references do not satisfy RS requirements; the book/magazine citations support statements regarding the film, not the performer. And the just-advanced argument that associating an identifiable living person with a porn performer, without a shred of supporting evidence, isn't a BLP violation because "it isn't necessarily a negative thing to everyone" demonstrates only the proponent's utter lack of understanding of essential BLP policy.
624:: This argument, advanced earlier, waters down the PORNBIO #2 standard far too much. No sources describe the film in terms that approach "iconic," "groundbreaking," or "blockbuster." The sources cited by Morbidthoughts don't go much beyond establishing the film as notable under the GNG. "Considered by a number of reviewers as one of the best," for example, hardly equates to "iconic." We cannot ignore the fact that this article
607:), which was apparently "one of the most successful foreign (European) x-rated films". I also note that the above BLP concern was not acted upon further by anyone. Being associated with adult films isn't necessarily a negative thing to everyone, and I'm not even sure that this actress used her real name in any of her adult film career. This article does need more citations though.
718:
Barely repealed the ban on pornography for adults in the
Federal Republic of Germany in 1975, hiked many filmmakers in the new genre of porn film about and did pioneering work in there. The quality of the films was at that time still quite high, and thanks to the existing budget and a technically
479:
as a fundamentally unsourced BLP, without prejudice to recreation as a redirect if a film article is written or as an article if reliably sourced biographical information can be found. This article perpetuates the unsourced and unreferenced association of the porn performer with a clearly
721:
The first "Josefine
Mutzenbacher"-the experienced Director Hans Billian turned porn film, which today is seen as one of the best porn of all time, in 1976. Starring at that time embodied the Wienerin Patricia Rhomberg, which perfectly fit into this role because their proper
652:"And the just-advanced argument that associating an dentifiable living person with a porn performer, without a shred of supporting evidence". As stated before, there's no evidence that this actress used her real name during her film career.
322:
None of the articles in any language cite reliable sources. I tagged the article as unsourced because there is nothing to support the article's biographical content. Links to film databases don't establish notability. Yes, I've heard of
642:"No sources describe the film in terms that approach 'iconic,' 'groundbreaking,' or 'blockbuster'"...only that the film was "one of the most successful foreign (European) x-rated films", which is basically the same, exact thing.
166:
431:
424:
393:
599:- After thinking about it some more, it appears that this (former?) actress satisfies the "starred in an iconic, groundbreaking or blockbuster feature" of PORNBIO for her lead role in "porn classic"
304:
Unfortunately the 4 links to external DBs do not establish notability. None of the other articles have any other sources. Can you provide references to support your claim that "the
119:
538:
419:, the fourth link quotes, "Sensational Janine has been considered by a number of adult film reviewers as one of the best foreign adult films released in the... (United States)".
229:
327:, but the significance of starring in a "cult" porn film needs acknowledgement by reliable sources. A Google News search yields one passing mention of Rhomberg in the film.
160:
709:
256:
373:
275:
This article has 4 links to external DBs and exists in 3 other languages. Why should the
English-speaking world not know about this person? Considering
126:
92:
87:
96:
370:
417:
416:- Satisfies criteria 2 of PORNBIO with her starring role in Sensational Janine. If you look at the GBooks hits for Sensational Janine
79:
17:
181:
633:
525:
485:
520:
Quite definitely not the identifiable living person I referred a bit vaguely to; note the content I removed from the article.
148:
242:
771:
40:
629:
521:
481:
142:
502:
is not clearly identifiable, likely fictional, and if it was based on a real person, that person is likely dead.
754:
692:
661:
637:
616:
587:
550:
529:
511:
507:
489:
465:
442:
438:
405:
385:
357:
336:
317:
296:
268:
246:
214:
61:
138:
480:
identifiable person of the same name, and suppression is needed before that claim is spread across the web!
750:
461:
292:
83:
743:
Has made unique contributions to a specific pornographic genre, such as beginning a trend in pornography;
188:
767:
688:
57:
36:
713:
225:
348:- FYI, I've updated the article in question with some of the references cited below and some others.
738:
705:
280:
202:
503:
434:
174:
673:
564:
433:. I can only imagine what the Austrian and German sources say since I am unable to research them.
313:
264:
210:
735:... hiked many filmmakers in the new genre of porn film about and did pioneering work in there.
154:
746:
657:
612:
582:
546:
457:
401:
381:
353:
332:
288:
238:
75:
67:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
766:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
684:
53:
276:
198:
645:"the two porn databases used as references do not satisfy RS requirements"...which is an
430:
regards it "one of the most successful x-rated foreign films ever to cross the
Atlantic".
309:
260:
206:
653:
608:
576:
542:
420:
397:
377:
349:
328:
233:
113:
456:- Thanks for your support for this article and for looking through Google Books.
205:
as not won a "well-known and significant industry award" or any award at all.
676:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
567:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
499:
760:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
394:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
230:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Log/2013 August 20
109:
105:
101:
683:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
173:
626:
has no reliable sources for its biographical content
574:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
224:
This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (
187:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
774:). No further edits should be made to this page.
423:regards it as an "all time foreign favorite".
8:
601:Josefine Mutzenbacher – Wie sie wirklich war
392:Note: This debate has been included in the
257:list of Austria-related deletion discussions
255:Note: This debate has been included in the
539:ongoing discussion about this article here
391:
254:
369:Note: This debate has been added to the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
733:as the lead star in this film that "
197:No sources or references to satisfy
24:
755:15:46, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
62:03:01, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
1:
693:08:07, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
228:). I have transcluded it to
662:20:01, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
638:13:37, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
617:02:50, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
588:15:54, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
551:21:48, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
530:00:50, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
512:15:41, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
490:11:15, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
466:07:00, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
443:23:32, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
406:13:38, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
386:13:38, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
358:02:04, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
337:13:58, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
318:13:55, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
297:12:13, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
269:11:41, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
247:11:25, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
215:11:28, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
791:
763:Please do not modify it.
708:#2 as indicated by this
32:Please do not modify it.
710:machine translated text
704:This does seem to meet
371:WikiProject Pornography
308:movie is a cult porn".
306:Josephine Mutzenbacher
287:movie is a cult porn.
285:Josephine Mutzenbacher
630:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
522:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
482:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
649:, not a fact at all.
605:Sensational Janine
325:Sensational Janine
222:Automated comment:
48:The result was
731:Patricia Rhomberg
716:which includes: "
695:
590:
408:
374:list of deletions
271:
249:
76:Patricia Rhomberg
68:Patricia Rhomberg
782:
765:
682:
678:
573:
569:
388:
236:
220:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
790:
789:
785:
784:
783:
781:
780:
779:
778:
772:deletion review
761:
729:This describes
671:
562:
368:
234:
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
788:
786:
777:
776:
757:
737:" which meets
726:
725:
720:
698:
697:
696:
680:
679:
668:
667:
666:
665:
664:
650:
643:
619:
593:
592:
591:
571:
570:
559:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
532:
515:
514:
504:Morbidthoughts
493:
492:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
468:
446:
445:
435:Morbidthoughts
410:
409:
389:
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
360:
340:
339:
320:
273:
272:
251:
250:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
787:
775:
773:
769:
764:
758:
756:
752:
748:
744:
740:
736:
732:
728:
727:
723:
715:
714:this original
711:
707:
703:
700:
699:
694:
690:
686:
681:
677:
675:
670:
669:
663:
659:
655:
651:
648:
644:
641:
640:
639:
635:
631:
627:
623:
620:
618:
614:
610:
606:
602:
598:
595:
594:
589:
585:
584:
579:
578:
572:
568:
566:
561:
560:
552:
548:
544:
540:
537:- There's an
536:
533:
531:
527:
523:
519:
518:
517:
516:
513:
509:
505:
501:
497:
496:
495:
494:
491:
487:
483:
478:
475:
474:
467:
463:
459:
455:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
444:
440:
436:
432:
429:
425:
422:
418:
415:
412:
411:
407:
403:
399:
395:
390:
387:
383:
379:
375:
372:
367:
366:
359:
355:
351:
347:
344:
343:
342:
341:
338:
334:
330:
326:
321:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
302:
301:
300:
299:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
270:
266:
262:
258:
253:
252:
248:
244:
240:
237:
231:
227:
223:
219:
218:
217:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
762:
759:
747:Technical 13
742:
734:
730:
717:
701:
672:
646:
625:
621:
604:
600:
596:
581:
575:
563:
534:
476:
458:YellowOnline
453:
428:Film Journal
427:
421:Jim Holliday
413:
345:
324:
305:
289:YellowOnline
284:
274:
221:
201:& Fails
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
49:
47:
31:
28:
685:Crisco 1492
161:free images
54:Mark Arsten
706:WP:PORNBIO
281:WP:PORNBIO
203:WP:PORNBIO
768:talk page
702:Weak Keep
541:as well.
500:character
398:• Gene93k
378:• Gene93k
329:• Gene93k
37:talk page
770:or in a
722:dialect.
674:Relisted
565:Relisted
310:Finnegas
261:Finnegas
207:Finnegas
120:View log
39:or in a
739:PORNBIO
654:Guy1890
647:opinion
622:Comment
609:Guy1890
577:postdlf
543:Guy1890
535:Comment
454:Comment
350:Guy1890
346:Comment
235:Snotbot
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
477:Delete
283:: the
277:WP:GNG
226:step 3
199:WP:GNG
139:Google
97:delete
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
751:talk
741:'s "
689:talk
658:talk
634:talk
613:talk
603:(or
597:Keep
583:talk
547:talk
526:talk
508:talk
498:The
486:talk
462:talk
439:talk
426:The
414:Keep
402:talk
382:talk
354:talk
333:talk
314:talk
293:talk
279:and
265:talk
211:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
50:keep
712:of
245:»
232:.
189:TWL
118:– (
753:)
745:"
691:)
660:)
636:)
615:)
586:)
549:)
528:)
510:)
488:)
464:)
441:)
404:)
396:.
384:)
376:.
356:)
335:)
316:)
295:)
267:)
259:.
241:•
213:)
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:.
749:(
724:"
687:(
656:(
632:(
611:(
580:(
545:(
524:(
506:(
484:(
460:(
437:(
400:(
380:(
352:(
331:(
312:(
291:(
263:(
243:c
239:t
209:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.