Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Paul Croft - Knowledge

Source 📝

402:
sentence with the names of his children, as an application of Do no harm. I am not happy with the way we often employ our BLP policy, which I think we often misuse to remove information about matters that are of significance, but we do need BLP, and this article show why. I invite some other admin to concur with me and speedy delete. I would think exactly the same of this content if added to any other WP article.
370:
People have voted delete here to avoid harm to the subject of the article but is it really all that bad to add a sentence or two in the Dumbledore article about this incident and point the subjects name to Dumbledore? Consider that the subject already willingly went to the press on his own I can't
401:
as BLP violation. The true essence of ONEEVENT--repeating trivialities that do not reflect well on anyone from the worst levels of the UK tabloid press. As a general rule, any article where the most reliable of the sources is the Sun is probable unsuitable for Knowledge. In any case, i removed a
313:
on humanitarian grounds as well as maintaining the standards of the place. Probably created as an act of attempted vandalism. The creator is probably laughing his socks off at this serious discussion resulting from his actions. (Deliberate wording there?)
331:
to Dumbledore. There's at least 2 reliable sources and while giving the whole incident an article of its own, putting it in perspective, would explain more about the effects of JKR's announcement about Dumbledore. -
349: 120: 451:. Amazing how an AfD for such a minor article written by a blocked user is so inspirational that it encourages two new editors register accounts and post here first. 387: 240:
Which means the event was far too minor to be worth an article--which given that's all the subject is known for, doesn't exactly help your case.
426:
to avoid BLP violations. It's their problem, not Knowledge's. Knowledge articles should only be proxying their content, in a sense, per the
295: 278: 17: 87: 82: 274: 91: 74: 435: 492: 383: 261: 36: 491:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
431: 227: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
379: 337: 299: 459: 139: 155: 477: 461: 439: 413: 391: 361: 339: 323: 303: 282: 265: 231: 210: 193: 176: 159: 141: 56: 375: 357: 257: 172: 223: 333: 219: 206: 128: 452: 319: 132: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
151: 353: 168: 78: 199:
Can't we like userfy? Transwiki to Uncy? Meta as cautionary tale? If not, sadly delete
427: 409: 202: 189: 474: 315: 50: 108: 291: 70: 62: 470: 404: 185: 252: 127:
Contested prod. If notable at all then purely passing notability, a
218:
Evidently notable. Note that that notability does not expire and
485:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
222:
requires a separate article on the event to be applicable.
371:
see it all that bad for the subject. - RhadamanthNemesis
273:. Croft=Cruft. Also, this article might be a BLP issue. 115: 104: 100: 96: 201:
I mean, this is hilarious, if not notable. Thanks!--
350:list of Living people-related deletion discussions 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 495:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 150:. Non-notable, faint whiff of hate crime. 348:: This debate has been included in the 7: 184:. Notability entirely transient. 24: 256:story disguised as an article. -- 167:. not notable, sound very POV. -- 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 478:22:31, 29 December 2008 (UTC) 462:18:19, 29 December 2008 (UTC) 440:00:54, 29 December 2008 (UTC) 414:22:34, 28 December 2008 (UTC) 392:02:18, 28 December 2008 (UTC) 362:00:01, 28 December 2008 (UTC) 340:19:30, 27 December 2008 (UTC) 324:18:24, 27 December 2008 (UTC) 304:17:27, 27 December 2008 (UTC) 283:13:17, 27 December 2008 (UTC) 266:13:13, 27 December 2008 (UTC) 232:12:42, 27 December 2008 (UTC) 211:11:46, 27 December 2008 (UTC) 194:23:47, 26 December 2008 (UTC) 177:23:44, 26 December 2008 (UTC) 160:23:39, 26 December 2008 (UTC) 142:23:23, 26 December 2008 (UTC) 57:02:19, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 512: 488:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 275:Are you ready for IPv6? 432:ProvidentialPrudence 44:The result was 422:It's the duty of 395: 380:RhadamanthNemesis 378:comment added by 364: 503: 490: 457: 394: 372: 344: 137: 118: 112: 94: 53: 34: 511: 510: 506: 505: 504: 502: 501: 500: 499: 493:deletion review 486: 453: 373: 258:CalendarWatcher 133: 114: 85: 69: 66: 51: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 509: 507: 498: 497: 481: 480: 464: 455:Unusual? Quite 445: 444: 443: 442: 417: 416: 396: 365: 342: 326: 307: 306: 285: 268: 244: 243: 242: 241: 235: 234: 224:Colonel Warden 213: 196: 179: 162: 135:Unusual? Quite 125: 124: 65: 60: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 508: 496: 494: 489: 483: 482: 479: 476: 472: 468: 465: 463: 460: 458: 456: 450: 447: 446: 441: 437: 433: 429: 425: 421: 420: 419: 418: 415: 411: 407: 406: 400: 399:Speedy Delete 397: 393: 389: 385: 381: 377: 369: 366: 363: 359: 355: 351: 347: 343: 341: 338: 335: 330: 327: 325: 321: 317: 312: 309: 308: 305: 301: 297: 293: 289: 286: 284: 280: 276: 272: 269: 267: 263: 259: 255: 254: 249: 246: 245: 239: 238: 237: 236: 233: 229: 225: 221: 217: 214: 212: 208: 204: 200: 197: 195: 191: 187: 183: 180: 178: 174: 170: 166: 163: 161: 157: 153: 149: 146: 145: 144: 143: 140: 138: 136: 130: 122: 117: 110: 106: 102: 98: 93: 89: 84: 80: 76: 72: 68: 67: 64: 61: 59: 58: 55: 54: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 487: 484: 466: 454: 448: 423: 403: 398: 367: 345: 328: 310: 296:85.92.130.47 287: 270: 251: 247: 215: 198: 181: 164: 147: 134: 126: 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 374:—Preceding 220:WP:ONEEVENT 152:Franciscrot 368:Question?: 354:Erwin85Bot 292:Dumbledore 169:Empire3131 71:Paul Croft 63:Paul Croft 430:policy.-- 129:one event 388:contribs 376:unsigned 203:Cerejota 121:View log 475:John254 449:Comment 424:The Sun 316:Peridon 271:Comment 88:protect 83:history 52:MBisanz 467:Delete 428:WP:NOR 311:Delete 248:Delete 182:Delete 165:Delete 148:Delete 116:delete 92:delete 46:delete 329:Merge 290:. To 288:Merge 119:) – ( 109:views 101:watch 97:links 16:< 469:per 436:talk 410:talk 384:talk 358:talk 352:. -- 346:Note 320:talk 300:talk 279:talk 262:talk 250:. A 228:talk 216:Keep 207:talk 190:talk 173:talk 156:talk 105:logs 79:talk 75:edit 471:DGG 405:DGG 334:Mgm 253:Sun 186:Deb 131:. 473:. 438:) 412:) 390:) 386:• 360:) 322:) 302:) 294:. 281:) 264:) 230:) 209:) 192:) 175:) 158:) 107:| 103:| 99:| 95:| 90:| 86:| 81:| 77:| 48:. 434:( 408:( 382:( 356:( 336:| 318:( 298:( 277:( 260:( 226:( 205:( 188:( 171:( 154:( 123:) 113:( 111:) 73:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
MBisanz
02:19, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Paul Croft
Paul Croft
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
one event
Unusual? Quite

23:23, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Franciscrot
talk
23:39, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Empire3131
talk
23:44, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Deb
talk
23:47, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.