Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Paul De Roy - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

256:
Does not meet GNG. The link from the books goes to the site of a self-publishing company. The article's creator is Bram De Roy, so COI is probable and Bram De Roy should probably cease editing the article as s/he has since this was nominated for deletion. It is plausible that there are suitable
411:
in Dutch, but it is still not sufficient to establish notability. His work is in a number of public collections, he has won a several awards, none of them notable in themselves, and he has exhibited his work, albeit not in a museum or gallery that would satisfy
216:
of some kind, as the article was created by an editor whose username was "Bram De Roy". I'm willing to withdraw this if somebody actually can locate better RS coverage than I've been able to, but in this state it's a
166: 321: 119: 361: 301: 341: 160: 204:
coverage to support it. As written this is effectively just "Paul De Roy is a writer and artist who exists", the referencing is exclusively to
126: 17: 92: 87: 200:
of a writer and artist, making no strong claim of notability per our inclusion standards for either occupation and citing no
96: 181: 148: 79: 444: 40: 205: 287: 244: 142: 408: 440: 138: 36: 425: 399: 373: 353: 333: 313: 292: 266: 248: 230: 61: 83: 57: 417: 275: 240: 188: 174: 413: 421: 75: 67: 369: 349: 329: 309: 226: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
439:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
262: 385: 213: 197: 53: 201: 154: 208:
like his own website and his own publishing company, and on a Google search I'm finding
389: 365: 345: 325: 305: 222: 113: 258: 257:
sources in Norwegian media, but they are not visible to me when I search.
384:- Searches turned up zero in-depth coverage of this individual. Fails 212:
that would improve the sourcing or the notability at all. Also likely
433:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
109: 105: 101: 173: 187: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 447:). No further edits should be made to this page. 322:list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions 274:as still questionably better for WP:CREATIVE. 8: 362:list of Artists-related deletion discussions 360:Note: This debate has been included in the 340:Note: This debate has been included in the 320:Note: This debate has been included in the 302:list of Belgium-related deletion discussions 300:Note: This debate has been included in the 342:list of People-related deletion discussions 359: 339: 319: 299: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 1: 464: 426:21:36, 24 April 2016 (UTC) 400:13:36, 24 April 2016 (UTC) 374:18:30, 23 April 2016 (UTC) 354:18:30, 23 April 2016 (UTC) 334:18:30, 23 April 2016 (UTC) 314:18:30, 23 April 2016 (UTC) 293:06:23, 23 April 2016 (UTC) 267:21:32, 21 April 2016 (UTC) 249:16:06, 17 April 2016 (UTC) 231:14:09, 17 April 2016 (UTC) 62:03:43, 25 April 2016 (UTC) 436:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 409:a bit more information 239:not notable enough 376: 356: 336: 316: 455: 438: 396: 393: 290: 285: 192: 191: 177: 129: 117: 99: 34: 463: 462: 458: 457: 456: 454: 453: 452: 451: 445:deletion review 434: 394: 391: 288: 276: 241:Daniel Kenneth 206:primary sources 202:reliable source 134: 125: 90: 74: 71: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 461: 459: 450: 449: 429: 428: 402: 378: 377: 357: 337: 317: 296: 295: 269: 251: 195: 194: 131: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 460: 448: 446: 442: 437: 431: 430: 427: 423: 419: 415: 410: 407:I have found 406: 403: 401: 398: 397: 387: 383: 380: 379: 375: 371: 367: 363: 358: 355: 351: 347: 343: 338: 335: 331: 327: 323: 318: 315: 311: 307: 303: 298: 297: 294: 291: 286: 283: 279: 273: 270: 268: 264: 260: 255: 252: 250: 246: 242: 238: 235: 234: 233: 232: 228: 224: 220: 215: 211: 207: 203: 199: 190: 186: 183: 180: 176: 172: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 140: 137: 136:Find sources: 132: 128: 124: 121: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 435: 432: 404: 390: 381: 281: 277: 271: 253: 236: 218: 209: 196: 184: 178: 170: 163: 157: 151: 145: 135: 122: 49: 47: 31: 28: 161:free images 76:Paul De Roy 68:Paul De Roy 54:Malcolmxl5 441:talk page 414:WP:ARTIST 366:• Gene93k 346:• Gene93k 326:• Gene93k 306:• Gene93k 37:talk page 443:or in a 418:Mduvekot 120:View log 39:or in a 223:Bearcat 210:nothing 167:WP refs 155:scholar 93:protect 88:history 405:Delete 386:WP:GNG 382:Delete 284:wister 280:wister 272:Delete 259:LaMona 254:Delete 237:Delete 219:delete 214:WP:COI 198:WP:BLP 139:Google 97:delete 50:delete 182:JSTOR 143:books 127:Stats 114:views 106:watch 102:links 16:< 422:talk 395:5969 392:Onel 370:talk 350:talk 330:talk 310:talk 289:talk 263:talk 245:talk 227:talk 175:FENS 149:news 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 58:talk 189:TWL 118:– ( 52:. 424:) 416:. 388:. 372:) 364:. 352:) 344:. 332:) 324:. 312:) 304:. 265:) 247:) 229:) 221:. 169:) 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 60:) 420:( 368:( 348:( 328:( 308:( 282:T 278:S 261:( 243:( 225:( 193:) 185:· 179:· 171:· 164:· 158:· 152:· 146:· 141:( 133:( 130:) 123:· 116:) 78:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Malcolmxl5
talk
03:43, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Paul De Roy
Paul De Roy
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:BLP
reliable source

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.