196:
There are many thinkers and philosophers who have written books. Using the books he has written as references proves that the gentleman exists, but that does not prove that he is notable. There is no notability asserted or verified.
165:
396:
per the refutation of the nominator's argument and the policy-based consensus above. Relisting is a waste of time when there are no valid arguments for deletion outstanding and such strong arguments for keeping.
118:
293:
159:
313:
273:
235:
Actually being translated is not inherently notable, nothing in the rules anyway. It's a good sign that he probably is, to look for other rules-based evidence. --
125:
91:
86:
95:
217:- If he has been translated into different languages, then I would say that supports the conclusion that he is sufficiently notable.
17:
78:
180:
147:
425:
40:
141:
56:
406:
384:
355:
325:
305:
285:
262:
244:
226:
208:
60:
351:
240:
137:
402:
187:
421:
380:
36:
82:
52:
347:
236:
173:
365:
258:
222:
203:
153:
398:
321:
301:
281:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
420:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
337:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
376:
74:
66:
344:
341:
254:
218:
198:
317:
297:
277:
112:
368:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
346:
though due to age and humanities aspect these are probably incomplete. --
249:
I didn't say being translated means he's notable. All I said was that it
340:. Works are quoted relentlessly on Google Books. 3,109 library holdings.
414:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
108:
104:
100:
172:
375:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
186:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
428:). No further edits should be made to this page.
294:list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions
8:
314:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
312:Note: This debate has been included in the
292:Note: This debate has been included in the
272:Note: This debate has been included in the
274:list of France-related deletion discussions
311:
291:
271:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
356:18:15, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
326:00:31, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
306:00:31, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
286:00:31, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
263:18:38, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
245:18:15, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
227:21:58, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
209:10:53, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
1:
343:Here are the citation numbers
61:22:02, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
407:08:05, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
385:03:05, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
445:
417:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
251:supports the conclusion
253:that he is notable.
387:
328:
308:
288:
436:
419:
374:
370:
206:
201:
191:
190:
176:
128:
116:
98:
34:
444:
443:
439:
438:
437:
435:
434:
433:
432:
426:deletion review
415:
363:
204:
199:
133:
124:
89:
73:
70:
53:DavidLeighEllis
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
442:
440:
431:
430:
410:
409:
390:
389:
388:
372:
371:
360:
359:
358:
348:Green Cardamom
330:
329:
309:
289:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
237:Green Cardamom
230:
229:
194:
193:
130:
69:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
441:
429:
427:
423:
418:
412:
411:
408:
404:
400:
395:
392:
391:
386:
382:
378:
373:
369:
367:
362:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
342:
339:
335:
332:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
310:
307:
303:
299:
295:
290:
287:
283:
279:
275:
270:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
247:
246:
242:
238:
234:
233:
232:
231:
228:
224:
220:
216:
213:
212:
211:
210:
207:
202:
189:
185:
182:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
139:
136:
135:Find sources:
131:
127:
123:
120:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:Paul Foulquié
72:
71:
68:
67:Paul Foulquié
65:
63:
62:
58:
54:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
416:
413:
399:Phil Bridger
393:
364:
333:
250:
214:
195:
183:
177:
169:
162:
156:
150:
144:
134:
121:
49:
47:
31:
28:
377:Mark Arsten
160:free images
422:talk page
318:• Gene93k
298:• Gene93k
278:• Gene93k
255:Greg Bard
219:Greg Bard
37:talk page
424:or in a
366:Relisted
119:View log
39:or in a
338:WP:PROF
166:WP refs
154:scholar
92:protect
87:history
205:Faddle
200:Fiddle
138:Google
96:delete
181:JSTOR
142:books
126:Stats
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
403:talk
394:Keep
381:talk
352:talk
336:per
334:Keep
322:talk
302:talk
282:talk
259:talk
241:talk
223:talk
215:Keep
174:FENS
148:news
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
57:talk
50:keep
188:TWL
117:– (
405:)
383:)
354:)
324:)
316:.
304:)
296:.
284:)
276:.
261:)
243:)
225:)
168:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
59:)
401:(
379:(
350:(
320:(
300:(
280:(
257:(
239:(
221:(
192:)
184:·
178:·
170:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
140:(
132:(
129:)
122:·
115:)
77:(
55:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.