361:
This is pretty superficial coverage of
Kelleher, mentioning not much more than it was he who damaged the statue. But there might be enough coverage to write an article about the statue itself and its decapitation, and to redirect "Paul Kelleher" to that article.
337:
to that. Causing embarrassment to someone of the same name is not an article criterion. However, if it is to be considered, then this is a reason to keep the article, as it is likely to be the only coverage that points to the fact that it is
160:
317:
notes: "The significance of an event or individual should be indicated by how persistent the coverage is in reliable sources." This incident continues to be referenced, e.g. BBC 2006,
222:
409:
154:
115:
248:
327:
297:- I share his name, actually and am very pleased that when my name is googled the 1st result is a guy cutting the head off a statue of Thatcher.
276:. Normally I would suggest a redirect, but since there is another Paul Kelleher this could be confused with I'm not sure that is a good idea.
120:
342:
the same person as the actor, i.e. it does not cause but counteracts the potential embarrassment, which already exists in other coverage.
88:
83:
92:
17:
330:
75:
175:
281:
142:
199:(last paragraph). As the article itself indicates, it may also cause embarrassment to another person of the same name.
272:. The relevant information is in the Thatcher article, but the incident as a standalone article falls far short of
455:
36:
454:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
277:
136:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
195:, because the person is apparently known only for a single incident of vandalism, which is already covered at
440:
422:
393:
374:
352:
306:
285:
263:
237:
211:
132:
57:
431:
A notable although forgettable incident; however for clarity and to obviate confusion it should remain...
182:
436:
168:
321:
259:
233:
79:
324:
196:
53:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
148:
314:
302:
192:
432:
365:
273:
202:
318:
415:
386:
345:
334:
255:
229:
71:
63:
49:
383:
Yes, I agree. And the incident article can make clear which
Kelleher is involved.
109:
298:
295:
it may also cause embarrassment to another person of the same name
448:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
293:
This is a very well known, albeit pointless, incident.
105:
101:
97:
167:
223:
list of United
Kingdom-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
458:). No further edits should be made to this page.
181:
8:
249:list of People-related deletion discussions
243:
217:
408:: This debate has been included in the
331:Decapitation of Margaret Thatcher statue
247:: This debate has been included in the
221:: This debate has been included in the
329:However, it may be advisable to create
410:list of Visual arts-related deletions
7:
197:Margaret Thatcher#After Parliament
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
475:
333:or some such and redirect
451:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
441:21:01, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
423:17:13, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
394:17:56, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
375:17:25, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
353:17:12, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
307:19:38, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
286:18:29, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
264:17:53, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
238:17:53, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
212:17:28, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
58:00:14, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
48:. --but move, per Ty.
326:Wales on Sunday 2009.
323:, The Guardian 2008,
278:Chris Neville-Smith
191:This article fails
320:The Guardian 2007,
44:The result was
425:
373:
266:
252:
240:
226:
210:
466:
453:
418:
404:
389:
372:
370:
363:
348:
253:
227:
209:
207:
200:
186:
185:
171:
123:
113:
95:
34:
474:
473:
469:
468:
467:
465:
464:
463:
462:
456:deletion review
449:
416:
387:
366:
364:
346:
203:
201:
128:
119:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
472:
470:
461:
460:
444:
443:
426:
401:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
378:
377:
356:
355:
309:
288:
267:
241:
189:
188:
125:
121:AfD statistics
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
471:
459:
457:
452:
446:
445:
442:
438:
434:
430:
427:
424:
421:
420:
419:
411:
407:
403:
402:
395:
392:
391:
390:
382:
381:
380:
379:
376:
371:
369:
360:
359:
358:
357:
354:
351:
350:
349:
341:
336:
335:Paul Kelleher
332:
328:
325:
322:
319:
316:
313:
310:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
289:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
268:
265:
261:
257:
250:
246:
242:
239:
235:
231:
224:
220:
216:
215:
214:
213:
208:
206:
198:
194:
184:
180:
177:
174:
170:
166:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
134:
131:
130:Find sources:
126:
122:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:Paul Kelleher
69:
68:
65:
64:Paul Kelleher
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
450:
447:
428:
414:
413:
405:
385:
384:
367:
344:
343:
339:
311:
294:
290:
269:
244:
218:
204:
190:
178:
172:
164:
157:
151:
145:
139:
129:
45:
43:
31:
28:
155:free images
368:Sandstein
205:Sandstein
433:Modernist
315:WP:BLP1E
256:Darkwind
230:Darkwind
193:WP:BLP1E
116:View log
274:WP:N/CA
161:WP refs
149:scholar
89:protect
84:history
50:Shimeru
270:Delete
133:Google
93:delete
299:Ceoil
254:-- --
228:-- --
176:JSTOR
137:books
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
437:talk
429:Keep
412:. –
406:Note
312:Keep
303:talk
291:Keep
282:talk
260:talk
245:Note
234:talk
219:Note
169:FENS
143:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
46:keep
340:not
183:TWL
118:•
114:– (
439:)
417:Ty
388:Ty
347:Ty
305:)
284:)
262:)
251:.
236:)
225:.
163:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
435:(
301:(
280:(
258:(
232:(
187:)
179:·
173:·
165:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
135:(
127:(
124:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.