205:
about M. Jones are irrelevant, as she has not been adopted as a candidate for the next election by the LD's, whereas Offer has, he is one of only c.10 people to be adopted by their respective parties, and was the first candidate after the '05 election to win selection for the following election.
139:, which article was deleted despite her continuing prominence in the seat and her blog and other claims to notability. In contrast, losing candidates who have less subjective claims, e.g. being a local councillor, have won keep votes, hence I didn't think it worthwhile putting up Cllr
190:
I can understand merging non-notable candidates, however this is a notable candidacy, and will remain memorable (even if only amongst
Cestrians and polititians. This reason was for the SWING, the fact that this is one of the most marginal seats in the country.
134:
We can't keep articles just to provide a balance of politics, notability for each individual article has to be asserted. Simply being a prominent losing candidate has several times not been considered notable enough - see
136:
122:
Not because of bias issues, but because running for public office under a major political party in one of the world's oldest democracies is in and of itself notable. Expand and keep.
105:, as well as his campainging in Chester. It would be a bias for (hence break the NPOV rule) as both the Labour and Lib Dem candidates have their own page.
101:
He is notable for securing one of the largest swings to
Conservative in the 2005 election and is believed to be in the top swings to not gain a seat
63:
Non-notable, defeated candidate, long way from next election to assess notability on that basis and we can't have every candidate on WP.
17:
225:
36:
224:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
207:
192:
210:
195:
182:
173:
161:
147:
126:
112:
93:
80:
67:
51:
123:
48:
57:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
144:
77:
64:
90:
179:
170:
109:
158:
140:
85:
Apparently not, based on a glance at the 41 G-hits off of the UK Google.
218:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
143:, the LibDem candidate, up for AfD. We need some consistency.
76:
is ther person notable for anything besides his candidacy?
178:
Is there some list of candidates we can merge this into?
169:
as a stub for now, but needs to be sourced and expanded.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
108:Feel free to nominate them for deletion as well.
228:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
44:The result of the debate was
245:
211:12:13, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
196:12:13, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
183:05:18, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
174:01:28, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
162:21:34, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
148:23:37, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
127:17:03, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
113:05:18, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
94:14:51, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
81:10:45, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
68:10:03, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
52:06:24, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
221:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
236:
223:
34:
244:
243:
239:
238:
237:
235:
234:
233:
232:
226:deletion review
219:
155:keep and expand
61:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
242:
240:
231:
230:
214:
213:
199:
198:
185:
176:
164:
157:per all above
152:
151:
150:
124:Captainktainer
117:
116:
115:
96:
83:
60:
55:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
241:
229:
227:
222:
216:
215:
212:
209:
208:84.64.161.206
204:
201:
200:
197:
194:
193:84.64.161.206
189:
186:
184:
181:
177:
175:
172:
168:
165:
163:
160:
156:
153:
149:
146:
142:
138:
137:Antonia Bance
133:
130:
129:
128:
125:
121:
118:
114:
111:
107:
106:
104:
100:
97:
95:
92:
88:
84:
82:
79:
75:
72:
71:
70:
69:
66:
59:
56:
54:
53:
50:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
220:
217:
202:
187:
166:
154:
131:
119:
102:
98:
86:
73:
62:
45:
43:
31:
28:
145:Mtiedemann
89:per nom.
78:Dspserpico
65:Mtiedemann
58:Paul Offer
141:Mia Jones
91:RGTraynor
203:Comments
180:Fagstein
171:Wstaffor
110:Fagstein
132:Comment
74:Comment
49:Kotepho
87:Delete
16:<
188:Keep
167:Keep
159:Jcuk
120:Keep
103:ever
99:Keep
46:Keep
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.