Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Paul georges - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

269:. Bio and Context. I too can't see any real assertion of notability, unless no-one else paints Istanbul. What those references are supposed to prove is beyond me. (I can't get into one because it insist on Macromedia Flash and I refuse to use Flash.) (I consider it unnecessary and a sign of unimaginative web design.) 380:
Since the consensus appeared to be that speedy deletion was due, replacing it wasn't bad (he just had to make sure he made note of it here). I'm still not convinced we should keep the new version. While the new painter has an NY Times obituary, the article text still doesn't explain why he's notable.
242:
I would have declined the speedy, too. At that time, the article specifically said he was a famous painter, which is a claim of importance. Remember, importance is a lower standard than notability.--
359:
I'm not sure you can just completely change the text of the entry to be about a completely different artist by the same name in the middle of an AFD discussion as you appear to have done.
452: 125: 416:
The added New York Times article is quite resourceful. His art is exhibited in major museums, so he seems to have sufficient notability for wikipedia. –
332: 172:. Notability issue now addressed, although the article would be less deletable if it said what Paul Georges was actually famous for. 17: 92: 87: 329: 96: 290:
now this is a different article about a notable person. I found quite a bit about this one while looking for the other one.
49: 177: 159: 79: 484: 537: 334:, and some mention in google scholar articles. I just replaced the article's text with a stub for this artist. I say 36: 438: 217:. No notability asserted. I'd like to know what the editor who denied the speedy on the grounds that notability 536:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
173: 155: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
480: 386: 408: 522: 505: 488: 470: 465: 442: 420: 388: 368: 347: 320: 299: 278: 254: 249: 230: 204: 181: 163: 144: 61: 57: 133: 434: 501: 382: 518: 364: 316: 295: 274: 200: 140: 83: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
459: 343: 243: 53: 497: 405: 417: 226: 195:
I agree, but the speedy deletion nomination from another editor was already denied.
514: 360: 312: 291: 270: 196: 136: 75: 67: 113: 339: 154:. Notability not asserted, a sweeping claim to being "famous" doesn't count. 479:
this Paul Georges. Not the non-notable original subject of the article.--
328:
It appears there is a highly notable artist by the name of Paul Georges:
222: 530:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
496:
notable and well documented artist, the article needs work...
432:, the article is about a different person, who is notable. — 429: 120: 109: 105: 101: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 540:). No further edits should be made to this page. 453:list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions 513:as it now is. Clearly notable from NYT obit. 8: 447: 451:: This debate has been included in the 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 407:would be a good source for this. 24: 410:might provide something useful. 331:. Google news archive search: 1: 221:asserted saw that I did not. 311:No notability established. 557: 523:16:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 506:03:35, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 489:00:09, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 471:17:03, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 443:17:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 421:12:01, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 389:11:57, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 369:04:25, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 348:04:08, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 321:02:11, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 300:20:55, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 279:21:29, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 255:17:04, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 231:21:04, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 205:20:25, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 182:18:55, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 164:20:22, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 145:20:18, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 62:00:01, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 533:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 174:Chris Neville-Smith 156:Chris Neville-Smith 481:Ethicoaestheticist 44:The result was 473: 456: 50:non-admin closure 548: 535: 468: 462: 457: 252: 246: 123: 117: 99: 34: 556: 555: 551: 550: 549: 547: 546: 545: 544: 538:deletion review 531: 466: 460: 435:LinguistAtLarge 250: 244: 119: 90: 74: 71: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 554: 552: 543: 542: 526: 525: 508: 491: 474: 445: 423: 411: 398: 397: 396: 395: 394: 393: 392: 391: 373: 372: 351: 350: 323: 305: 304: 303: 302: 282: 281: 260: 259: 258: 257: 234: 233: 211: 210: 209: 208: 187: 186: 185: 184: 132:NN Artist per 130: 129: 70: 65: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 553: 541: 539: 534: 528: 527: 524: 520: 516: 512: 509: 507: 503: 499: 495: 492: 490: 486: 482: 478: 475: 472: 469: 463: 454: 450: 446: 444: 441: 440: 436: 431: 430:this revision 427: 424: 422: 419: 415: 412: 409: 406: 403: 400: 399: 390: 387: 384: 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 370: 366: 362: 358: 355: 354: 353: 352: 349: 345: 341: 337: 333: 330: 327: 324: 322: 318: 314: 310: 307: 306: 301: 297: 293: 289: 286: 285: 284: 283: 280: 276: 272: 268: 266: 265:Speedy Delete 262: 261: 256: 253: 247: 241: 238: 237: 236: 235: 232: 228: 224: 220: 216: 213: 212: 206: 202: 198: 194: 191: 190: 189: 188: 183: 179: 175: 171: 168: 167: 166: 165: 161: 157: 153: 152:Speedy Delete 149: 148: 147: 146: 142: 138: 135: 127: 122: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 532: 529: 510: 493: 476: 448: 433: 425: 413: 401: 356: 335: 325: 308: 287: 267:as it stands 264: 263: 239: 218: 214: 192: 169: 151: 150: 131: 76:Paul georges 68:Paul georges 45: 43: 31: 28: 461:Fabrictramp 336:Strong Keep 245:Fabrictramp 134:WP:Creative 54:Ron Ritzman 467:talk to me 404:new stub. 251:talk to me 498:Modernist 428:- As of 418:sgeureka 126:View log 515:Johnbod 371:wperdue 361:Wperdue 326:Comment 313:Hekerui 292:Peridon 271:Peridon 207:wperdue 197:Wperdue 137:Wperdue 93:protect 88:history 340:Cazort 309:Delete 215:Delete 121:delete 97:delete 357:Reply 240:Reply 193:Reply 124:) – ( 114:views 106:watch 102:links 16:< 519:talk 511:Keep 502:talk 494:Keep 485:talk 477:Keep 449:Note 439:Talk 426:Keep 414:Keep 402:Keep 365:talk 344:talk 317:talk 296:talk 288:Keep 275:talk 227:talk 201:talk 178:talk 170:Keep 160:talk 141:talk 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 58:talk 46:keep 458:-- 383:Mgm 338:. 223:I42 219:was 48:. ( 521:) 504:) 487:) 464:| 455:. 437:• 381:- 367:) 346:) 319:) 298:) 277:) 248:| 229:) 203:) 180:) 162:) 143:) 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 60:) 52:) 517:( 500:( 483:( 385:| 363:( 342:( 315:( 294:( 273:( 225:( 199:( 176:( 158:( 139:( 128:) 118:( 116:) 78:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
non-admin closure
Ron Ritzman
talk
00:01, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Paul georges
Paul georges
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
WP:Creative
Wperdue
talk
20:18, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Chris Neville-Smith
talk
20:22, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Chris Neville-Smith
talk
18:55, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Wperdue

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.