627:. He's a notable person. I re-wrote the article and removed anything I could not readily find in sources that are available to me. I understand that I replaced one off-line source with another, but I guess you'll just have to trust me ;) I can only blame under-developed reference sites in Lithuanian. But I have to say, this is the most elaborate hoax I have come across.
359:- I have indefinitely blocked the nominator/creator from further editing because of their persistent disruptive editing. At this point, I am uncertain to claims that the articles are hoaxes -- or how much is unsubstantiated. An editor who is familiar with Lithuanian sources should be requested to examine this article as well as
412:
Interesting. How much credence does one give to the confession? Especially given the rapid change in characterization from hoax to 'not a complete hoax'. A Google search reveals numerous mentions, and I don't buy the claim this user made on another page, that the family museum borrowed information
517:, an administrator on the Lithuanian Knowledge (XXG) who speaks English as well. According to CD, this article looks okay, assuming that the Lithuanian article (which is much older than this one, and has not changed much in the past few months) is not also full of false information.
163:
573:
416:--they wouldn't need to. Agreed that what is needed is someone learned in Lithuanian language and culture. Until then I'd not delete on the less than reliable say-so of the article's creator.
118:
547:
157:
385:
48:- Article was determined not to be a complete hoax and was rewritten to substantiated sources. Any further content issues can be discussed on the talk page.
513:
has been very helpful here, and speaks fluent
Lithuanian and English, so I imagine he can help us to get to the bottom of this mess. I've also contacted
290:
The same procedure we use for every article -- by searching for reliable sources. More importantly: are the other articles which you created also hoaxes?
123:
91:
86:
95:
601:'s contacting of helpful Lithuanian speaking editors. Whether this was a (partial) hoax seems irrelevant now as the info can be verified.
78:
245:, you probably don't want to keep an article chock-full of fake references and lies. Better to start again. It's not a complete hoax.
17:
460:
178:
514:
145:
668:
36:
139:
653:
636:
619:
588:
562:
537:
531:
493:
472:
450:
425:
403:
375:
335:
321:
302:
285:
271:
254:
228:
203:
60:
360:
309:
135:
667:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
185:
82:
609:
438:
in
February 2005 (five years before the creation of this article) and was last updated in October 2009.
171:
151:
74:
66:
194:
I am the author of the article, and it is a hoax. I've requested a G7, but it's been refused.
632:
602:
584:
558:
484:
468:
441:
394:
366:
331:
317:
293:
281:
262:
250:
219:
199:
51:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
242:
238:
213:
524:
434:
I agree with your assessment. Despite the creator's claims, the museum webpage existed
649:
421:
259:
If it is not a complete hoax, and the person is notable, than it should be stubbed.
628:
580:
554:
510:
464:
327:
313:
277:
246:
195:
112:
598:
519:
645:
417:
326:
By the way, I've requested a five year block to prevent me from hoaxing.
276:
How are you going to decide which information is made up or not ?
661:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
574:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
435:
414:
108:
104:
100:
170:
481:
Whoops... yes, that is the link I meant. Thank you.
184:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
671:). No further edits should be made to this page.
548:list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions
386:list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions
8:
568:
542:
380:
644:Thank you for cleaning this up, Renata3.
572:: This debate has been included in the
546:: This debate has been included in the
384:: This debate has been included in the
597:This seems to be acceptable now, given
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
212:-- Can you explain the validity of
24:
413:from the Knowledge (XXG) article
239:our policy on sources, does it?
1:
654:04:03, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
637:03:33, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
620:01:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
589:00:10, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
563:00:10, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
538:22:47, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
494:04:25, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
473:03:40, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
451:00:33, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
426:21:05, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
404:20:46, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
376:20:41, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
336:20:21, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
322:20:20, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
303:20:14, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
286:20:10, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
272:20:10, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
255:20:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
229:20:05, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
204:20:00, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
61:04:37, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
688:
312:is. The other two aren't.
664:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
361:Jonas Asevičius-Acukas
310:Jonas Asevičius-Acukas
463:to 2005 museum site.
459:I think you meant
44:The result was
591:
577:
565:
551:
406:
389:
241:In any case, per
679:
666:
616:
613:
606:
578:
552:
534:
529:
522:
492:
490:
487:
449:
447:
444:
402:
400:
397:
390:
374:
372:
369:
301:
299:
296:
270:
268:
265:
227:
225:
222:
189:
188:
174:
126:
116:
98:
59:
57:
54:
34:
687:
686:
682:
681:
680:
678:
677:
676:
675:
669:deletion review
662:
614:
611:
604:
532:
525:
520:
488:
485:
482:
445:
442:
439:
398:
395:
392:
370:
367:
364:
297:
294:
291:
266:
263:
260:
223:
220:
217:
131:
122:
89:
75:Paulius Galaunė
73:
70:
67:Paulius Galaunė
55:
52:
49:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
685:
683:
674:
673:
657:
656:
639:
622:
592:
566:
540:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
476:
475:
454:
453:
429:
428:
407:
378:
353:
352:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
232:
231:
192:
191:
128:
124:AfD statistics
69:
64:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
684:
672:
670:
665:
659:
658:
655:
651:
647:
643:
640:
638:
634:
630:
626:
623:
621:
618:
617:
608:
607:
600:
596:
593:
590:
586:
582:
575:
571:
567:
564:
560:
556:
549:
545:
541:
539:
536:
535:
530:
528:
523:
516:
512:
508:
505:
504:
495:
491:
480:
479:
478:
477:
474:
470:
466:
462:
458:
457:
456:
455:
452:
448:
437:
433:
432:
431:
430:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
408:
405:
401:
387:
383:
379:
377:
373:
362:
358:
355:
354:
337:
333:
329:
325:
324:
323:
319:
315:
311:
308:
307:
306:
305:
304:
300:
289:
288:
287:
283:
279:
275:
274:
273:
269:
258:
257:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
237:Doesn't meet
236:
235:
234:
233:
230:
226:
215:
211:
208:
207:
206:
205:
201:
197:
187:
183:
180:
177:
173:
169:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
137:
134:
133:Find sources:
129:
125:
120:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
58:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
663:
660:
641:
624:
610:
605:freshacconci
603:
594:
569:
543:
526:
518:
511:User:Renata3
506:
436:in this form
409:
381:
356:
209:
193:
181:
175:
167:
160:
154:
148:
142:
132:
45:
43:
31:
28:
625:Speedy keep
214:this source
158:free images
599:User:Soap
581:• Gene93k
555:• Gene93k
461:this link
210:Question
119:View log
489:Writer
446:Writer
410:Comment
399:Writer
371:Writer
328:Nefesf9
314:Nefesf9
298:Writer
278:Nefesf9
267:Writer
247:Nefesf9
224:Writer
196:Nefesf9
164:WP refs
152:scholar
92:protect
87:history
56:Writer
629:Renata
486:Cactus
465:Renata
443:Cactus
396:Cactus
368:Cactus
295:Cactus
264:Cactus
243:WP:IAR
221:Cactus
136:Google
96:delete
53:Cactus
179:JSTOR
140:books
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
650:talk
642:Keep
633:talk
615:talk
612:talk
595:Keep
585:talk
570:Note
559:talk
544:Note
527:Soap
507:Note
469:talk
422:talk
382:Note
357:NOTE
332:talk
318:talk
282:talk
251:talk
200:talk
172:FENS
146:news
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
46:Keep
646:JNW
579:--
553:--
418:JNW
186:TWL
121:•
117:– (
652:)
635:)
587:)
576:.
561:)
550:.
515:CD
509::
483:—
471:)
440:—
424:)
393:—
388:.
365:—
363:.
334:)
320:)
292:—
284:)
261:—
253:)
218:—
216:?
202:)
166:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
50:—
648:(
631:(
583:(
557:(
533:—
521:—
467:(
420:(
391:—
330:(
316:(
280:(
249:(
198:(
190:)
182:·
176:·
168:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
143:·
138:(
130:(
127:)
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.