Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Paydin LoPachin - Knowledge

Source 📝

148: 211:, unless you consider "Cheerleader #1," "Brody's Next Victim," and "Mary #2" to be significant roles. Pretty girl, though, and I wouldn't be too surprised if she gets notable roles later on in her career. But that's not a matter for this discussion. 354:
While the effort of sourcing is impressive, nothing added is anything but trivial coverage, and coverage centered on the character rather than the actress. I'm a bit skeptical this qualifies as "squeeking past the
183: 293: 132: 240:
reads as a local human interest type story. In summary, she falls just below the bar. (It is not unreasonable to think this will change, however we have
160: 147:) removed before deletion with the mention "Adding Filmography". Unfortunately, it doesn't address the sourcing issue mentioned in the PROD. 62: 99: 94: 103: 86: 17: 372: 341: 36: 371:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
57: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
346: 305: 281: 253: 217: 198: 172: 68: 208: 144: 334: 301: 265: 90: 277: 249: 52: 49: 238: 152: 241: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
268:. She still only has one notable role, so she fails ENT. However, she appears to pass the 194: 168: 297: 82: 74: 273: 245: 233:
requires 2+. Seems to have a minor fan base with a few trivial mentions on the web +
356: 315: 269: 230: 156: 212: 140: 120: 190: 164: 328: 143:
demonstrating that this person meets the inclusion criteriae, in particular
320:
Significant coverage is more than trivial but may be less than exclusive
234: 322:") per her less-than-trivial coverages in genre-specifc reviews (" 272:
by being covered in multiple sources in a non-trivial fashion. --
365:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
324:
Sources may encompass published works in all forms and media
184:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
237:. ENt requires 'significant following'. Lone news story 127: 116: 112: 108: 294:list of Living people-related deletion discussions 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 375:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 163:only returns trivial or placeholder pages. 178: 182:: This debate has been included in the 292:: This debate has been included in the 7: 229:- Has one lead role (Triloquist), 24: 155:, which might qualify, but the 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 270:general notability guidelines 326:") for her starring role in 314:as just squeeking past the 392: 139:Expired PROD (reason: No 368:Please do not modify it. 347:04:23, 15 May 2009 (UTC) 306:00:00, 13 May 2009 (UTC) 282:04:27, 15 May 2009 (UTC) 254:15:59, 12 May 2009 (UTC) 218:08:18, 12 May 2009 (UTC) 199:08:00, 12 May 2009 (UTC) 173:07:59, 12 May 2009 (UTC) 69:05:38, 19 May 2009 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 235:hotties semi-article 207:Unequivocally fials 159:requires several. 44:The result was 308: 264:per work done by 260:Changing vote to 201: 187: 151:turns up exactly 383: 370: 337: 288: 215: 188: 141:reliable sources 130: 124: 106: 65: 60: 55: 34: 391: 390: 386: 385: 384: 382: 381: 380: 379: 373:deletion review 366: 335: 266:MichaelQSchmidt 213: 126: 97: 83:Paydin LoPachin 81: 78: 75:Paydin LoPachin 63: 58: 53: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 389: 387: 378: 377: 361: 360: 349: 309: 285: 284: 257: 256: 221: 220: 209:WP:ENTERTAINER 202: 145:WP:ENTERTAINER 137: 136: 77: 72: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 388: 376: 374: 369: 363: 362: 358: 353: 350: 348: 345: 344: 343: 339: 338: 331: 330: 325: 321: 317: 313: 310: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 287: 286: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 259: 258: 255: 251: 247: 243: 239: 236: 232: 228: 227: 223: 222: 219: 216: 210: 206: 203: 200: 196: 192: 185: 181: 177: 176: 175: 174: 170: 166: 162: 161:Google Search 158: 154: 150: 146: 142: 134: 129: 122: 118: 114: 110: 105: 101: 96: 92: 88: 84: 80: 79: 76: 73: 71: 70: 66: 61: 56: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 367: 364: 351: 342: 340: 333: 327: 323: 319: 311: 289: 261: 225: 224: 204: 179: 138: 46:no consensus 45: 43: 31: 28: 226:Weak Delete 149:Google News 329:Triloquist 298:Erwin85Bot 242:WP:CRYSTAL 153:one source 274:ThaddeusB 262:Weak Keep 246:ThaddeusB 336:Schmidt, 133:View log 352:Comment 214:Nosleep 100:protect 95:history 50:King of 357:WP:GNG 316:WP:GNG 231:WP:ENT 205:Delete 191:MLauba 165:MLauba 128:delete 104:delete 244:). -- 131:) – ( 121:views 113:watch 109:links 16:< 312:Keep 302:talk 296:. -- 290:Note 278:talk 250:talk 195:talk 180:Note 169:talk 117:logs 91:talk 87:edit 157:GNG 359:". 332:. 318:(" 304:) 280:) 252:) 197:) 186:. 171:) 119:| 115:| 111:| 107:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 67:♠ 48:. 300:( 276:( 248:( 193:( 189:— 167:( 135:) 125:( 123:) 85:( 64:♣ 59:♦ 54:♥

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
King of



05:38, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Paydin LoPachin
Paydin LoPachin
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
reliable sources
WP:ENTERTAINER
Google News
one source
GNG
Google Search
MLauba
talk
07:59, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.