Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Payoneer - Knowledge

Source 📝

462:. Most venture funds raises get a brief story like that in specialist venues. The mainstream media articles don't focus on this company; the coverage there is incidental. Those terrorists also used somebody else's prepaid cards. "In addition, police distributed a map showing the numbers of 17 credit cards allegedly obtained by the suspects from financial institutions in Germany, Britain and the U.S. state of Iowa." followed by "Dubai police tied 510:, not only because of the mentions in the articles about the assassination (which are not only passing mentions, but very in-depth in several cases), but there is also sufficient coverage about the business itself (many start-ups that come through AfD would die to have this much coverage). Here are other links, I think none of them duplicates those already available 466:
to another American company, Payoneer Inc., which provides prepaid MasterCards issued by MetaBank and other lenders. The role of the privately held company, which is based in New York and has a research and development center in Tel Aviv, was not immediately clear." This mention justifies an article?
209:
and subsequently cleaned-up by other diligent editors. My goal is to create a series of articles on alternative payment types . . . in my spare time as it were. This is an extremely relevent topic. Unfortunately, a lot of people (and anonymous or banned users) have taken liberties, added promotion,
383:
I was looking for information about Payoneer following a press release, and could not find sufficient information about it, including in this article. Payoneer is a large company with millions of customers and users, and therefore article should definitely not be deleted, but rather updated and
330:
I don't see anything in this article as "advertising" - it's describing the business model of the company and referencing work done in conjunction with other reputable companies. This article should be retained and linked to a broader article on electronic payment methods.
191:. Has a few links but they seem to be press releases and merely trivial coverage or mentions. Was speedy deleteted 3 times previously as G11: Blatant advertising: Self-promotion and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. 237:
I'm not sure what it is about this article that makes it blatant advertising. I just reread it and honestly don't feel it's misleading. Just the opposite, there are sections here that I would probably delete if I were to be promoting the company.
352:
I came across this article and tried to make it sound more objective and less like a press release. I'm not sure deletion is the right way to go, maybe more editing could make it more informational and helpful to users of Knowledge.
415:
were from news sources. Most of the remaining PRs were from reliable third parties. The first 3 speedy deletes were warranted. The article in it's originally approved through 5 March 2011 form was not promotional.
156: 286:. It feels mighty thin, and I'm half tempted to put a Delete here. But there is some coverage, if you include the terrorist thing - so I'll take some more time to look into this one. 218:
notable. But in the landscape of alternative payment types, Payoneer is notable and relevant. I believe the best course of action is to revert the article back to the version dated
241:
As for the sources, again, I'm not sure how it makes it worse. They are clearly newsworthy, and a search on Google shows over 300,000 mentions, which is by no means trivial.
117: 150: 205:
I am the original creator of this article. It was basically a stub, was not promotional, and had solid citations. It was approved by the editor,
248: 292: 338: 17: 523: 491: 489: 521: 400: 372: 90: 85: 517: 171: 94: 138: 549: 77: 36: 548:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
446: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
252: 493:, and should be used to expand this article to cover the company's history and market share (Russia, etc.) 132: 319: 388: 360: 342: 334: 244: 188: 128: 513: 534: 502: 476: 459: 448: 439: 425: 404: 376: 346: 323: 296: 276: 256: 231: 200: 164: 59: 519: 530: 498: 472: 364: 272: 515: 178: 421: 287: 227: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
396: 368: 315: 306: 438:. I have restored the March 5th version of the article, as it was not an advertisemnt. 196: 55: 144: 526: 494: 468: 435: 268: 81: 417: 223: 111: 511: 392: 264: 309:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
192: 50: 463: 73: 65: 206: 542:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
458:. I only see routine coverage here not something satisfying 354: 267:
could be considered as sources that are not noteworthy.
412: 219: 107: 103: 99: 384:
improved. I will do my best to help in this process.
163: 214:
citations . So, as a lone company, they may not be
314:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 552:). No further edits should be made to this page. 411:Most of the citations from the version dated 177: 8: 434:This article has significant coverage in 263:I don't see how the New York Times and 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 436:reliable third party sources 569: 484:actually. The coverage in 545:Please do not modify it. 535:02:27, 31 May 2011 (UTC) 503:23:41, 28 May 2011 (UTC) 477:21:53, 28 May 2011 (UTC) 449:18:59, 28 May 2011 (UTC) 426:21:07, 26 May 2011 (UTC) 405:14:59, 26 May 2011 (UTC) 377:09:06, 25 May 2011 (UTC) 347:08:29, 25 May 2011 (UTC) 324:00:02, 25 May 2011 (UTC) 297:12:44, 20 May 2011 (UTC) 277:12:35, 19 May 2011 (UTC) 257:22:27, 18 May 2011 (UTC) 232:13:35, 19 May 2011 (UTC) 201:16:28, 18 May 2011 (UTC) 60:03:22, 1 June 2011 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 222:and police it better. 488:is quite substantial 486:The New York Observer 413:22:01, 5 March 2011 220:22:01, 5 March 2011 467:I don't think so. 44:The result was 408: 391:comment added by 380: 363:comment added by 337:comment added by 326: 295: 247:comment added by 560: 547: 444: 407: 385: 379: 357: 349: 313: 311: 291: 259: 182: 181: 167: 115: 97: 34: 568: 567: 563: 562: 561: 559: 558: 557: 556: 550:deletion review 543: 440: 386: 358: 332: 304: 242: 124: 88: 72: 69: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 566: 564: 555: 554: 538: 537: 505: 479: 451: 442:Alpha Quadrant 328: 327: 312: 301: 300: 299: 280: 279: 236: 207:Alpha Quadrant 187:Article fails 185: 184: 121: 68: 63: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 565: 553: 551: 546: 540: 539: 536: 532: 528: 524: 522: 520: 518: 516: 514: 512: 509: 506: 504: 500: 496: 492: 490: 487: 483: 480: 478: 474: 470: 465: 461: 457: 456: 452: 450: 447: 445: 443: 437: 433: 430: 429: 428: 427: 423: 419: 414: 409: 406: 402: 398: 394: 390: 381: 378: 374: 370: 366: 362: 356: 350: 348: 344: 340: 336: 325: 321: 317: 310: 308: 303: 302: 298: 294: 289: 285: 282: 281: 278: 274: 270: 266: 262: 261: 260: 258: 254: 250: 249:109.65.204.32 246: 239: 234: 233: 229: 225: 221: 217: 213: 208: 203: 202: 198: 194: 190: 189:WP:NOTABILITY 180: 176: 173: 170: 166: 162: 158: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 130: 127: 126:Find sources: 122: 119: 113: 109: 105: 101: 96: 92: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 70: 67: 64: 62: 61: 57: 53: 52: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 544: 541: 507: 485: 481: 460:WP:CORPDEPTH 454: 453: 441: 431: 410: 387:— Preceding 382: 359:— Preceding 351: 333:— Preceding 329: 305: 288:UltraExactZZ 283: 240: 235: 215: 211: 210:and deleted 204: 186: 174: 168: 160: 153: 147: 141: 135: 125: 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 316:Ron Ritzman 243:—Preceding 151:free images 339:72.52.96.9 265:Techcrunch 495:FuFoFuEd 469:FuFoFuEd 464:MetaBank 401:contribs 389:unsigned 373:contribs 361:unsigned 335:unsigned 307:Relisted 269:Milchama 245:unsigned 118:View log 74:Payoneer 66:Payoneer 527:frankie 418:Meshatz 284:Comment 224:Meshatz 157:WP refs 145:scholar 91:protect 86:history 455:Delete 393:Michts 365:Hhcaas 355:Hhcaas 216:highly 129:Google 95:delete 172:JSTOR 133:books 112:views 104:watch 100:links 48:. -- 16:< 531:talk 508:Keep 499:talk 482:Keep 473:talk 432:Keep 422:talk 397:talk 369:talk 343:talk 320:talk 273:talk 253:talk 228:talk 212:good 197:talk 193:Hu12 165:FENS 139:news 108:logs 82:talk 78:edit 56:talk 51:Cirt 46:keep 293:Did 179:TWL 116:– ( 533:) 525:- 501:) 475:) 424:) 403:) 399:• 375:) 371:• 345:) 322:) 275:) 255:) 230:) 199:) 159:) 110:| 106:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 84:| 80:| 58:) 529:( 497:( 471:( 420:( 395:( 367:( 341:( 318:( 290:~ 271:( 251:( 226:( 195:( 183:) 175:· 169:· 161:· 154:· 148:· 142:· 136:· 131:( 123:( 120:) 114:) 76:( 54:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Cirt
talk
03:22, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Payoneer
Payoneer
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:NOTABILITY
Hu12
talk
16:28, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.