185:
respectively. There probably are reliable sources that talk about this, but I think the 2 distinct topics in this article, which don't really flow together, are better situated in the other two. In the second part, there's too much emphasis on
Slashdot as most decent sites should know to parse for a
324:
I think these two topics need to be separated, and merged to appropriate locations if they exist. If appropriate locations don't exist, I think this material could simply be deleted. I'm not sure we need a definition of page widening, and the info is kind of obvious. The second topic is more
211:
I am totally mystified by the accusation of "original research". The article is self-defining in a way - it contains examples of page widening - what more needs to be said? OK, possibly a couple of external links to show that this is the accepted term and to point to examples of
142:
Also apologies to RHaworth, who restored, for not discussing this undeletion with him before coming to AfD. I didn't realise that the article was a restoration until I had opened this discussion. I've notified him.
121:
344:
52:
for now but if anyone has a better idea for a target feel free to change that. I'm doing this so that anyone interested can perform the small merges suggested below.
216:
132:. Its significance as a phenomenon is not explored. In September, 2006, it was listed as a PROD and then deleted. More recently it seems to have been restored.
248:
199:
222:
A slight change of wording converts any "how to" aspect (and in any case it would be an how-not-to!) into an "how it happens" statement. Merge into
163:
219:
for the term. The article has been around for over five years it certainly should not be deleted just because some anon has prodded it.
17:
94:
89:
98:
56:
235:
81:
198:. A technical term whose meaning is not obvious so a definition is needed. It is being used in this way from places such as
129:
404:
36:
203:
403:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
128:
Orphaned page, seems more like a HOWTO than an article. It's poorly sourced and seems to be the result of
389:
359:
334:
330:
316:
285:
260:
239:
190:
168:
147:
144:
136:
133:
63:
385:
157:
85:
313:
254:
231:
354:
326:
281:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
381:
187:
53:
377:
369:
373:
309:
227:
77:
69:
351:
277:
115:
271:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
182:
305:
301:
223:
178:
49:
397:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
251:
has been notified of this ongoing discussion. --User:Ceyockey (
325:
vandalism than trolling, and it seems rather obscure to me.
226:
is inappropriate - it deserves its own short article. --
111:
107:
103:
276:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
215:I was surprised at the relatively small number of
186:high number of consecutive non-space characters. –
407:). No further edits should be made to this page.
345:list of Internet-related deletion discussions
8:
343:: This debate has been included in the
304:(probably a more precise target than
173:There are two parts to this article;
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
130:Knowledge (XXG):original research
1:
169:16:26, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
148:20:05, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
137:15:24, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
390:20:49, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
249:WikiProject Internet culture
64:20:01, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
360:22:51, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
335:21:56, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
317:21:04, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
286:20:26, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
261:05:34, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
240:04:54, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
191:08:18, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
424:
400:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
175:selective minimal merge
48:. I'm redirecting to
362:
348:
288:
263:
258:
415:
402:
376:and is probably
368:per nom. Fails
357:
349:
339:
275:
273:
252:
246:
119:
101:
61:
34:
423:
422:
418:
417:
416:
414:
413:
412:
411:
405:deletion review
398:
355:
269:
167:
164:r e s e a r c h
92:
76:
73:
57:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
421:
419:
410:
409:
393:
392:
363:
337:
319:
290:
289:
274:
266:
265:
264:
243:
242:
220:
213:
208:
207:
193:
171:
161:
150:
126:
125:
72:
67:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
420:
408:
406:
401:
395:
394:
391:
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
367:
364:
361:
358:
353:
346:
342:
338:
336:
332:
328:
323:
320:
318:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
292:
291:
287:
283:
279:
272:
268:
267:
262:
257:
256:
250:
245:
244:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
218:
214:
210:
209:
205:
201:
197:
194:
192:
189:
184:
180:
176:
172:
170:
166:
165:
160:
159:
154:
151:
149:
146:
141:
140:
139:
138:
135:
131:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
78:Page widening
75:
74:
71:
70:Page widening
68:
66:
65:
62:
60:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
399:
396:
365:
340:
327:Brianyoumans
321:
297:
293:
270:
253:
195:
174:
162:
156:
152:
145:Tony Sidaway
134:Tony Sidaway
127:
58:
45:
43:
31:
28:
382:Vegaswikian
322:Weak Delete
217:Google hits
153:Weak delete
255:talk to me
183:forum spam
306:scrolling
302:word wrap
224:scrolling
212:trolling.
179:scrolling
155:per nom--
50:word wrap
310:Dhartung
298:redirect
236:contribs
228:RHaworth
122:View log
46:redirect
352:the wub
278:Caknuck
95:protect
90:history
366:Delete
247:Note:
99:delete
378:WP:OR
370:WP:RS
308:). --
294:Merge
188:Pomte
158:h i s
116:views
108:watch
104:links
59:juice
54:Mango
16:<
386:talk
374:WP:N
356:"?!"
341:Note
331:talk
314:Talk
296:and
282:talk
232:Talk
204:here
200:here
196:Keep
181:and
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
350:--
347:.
300:to
202:or
177:to
120:– (
388:)
380:.
372:,
333:)
312:|
284:)
259:)
238:)
234:|
143:--
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
384:(
329:(
280:(
230:(
206:.
124:)
118:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.