Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Painface - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

68:. They released two albums, but the label is not mentioned, so it is unclear whether or not it was a major label. No mention of awards, no mention of national tours. Only one member has an article. Band broke up in 2001. Probably could be included on single band member's entry. Either 111:. As Slipknot only became successful after the member in question had left, the latter part would seem to be correct. Please also note that there is (quite rightly) no requirement under 119:
or one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable)"
17: 183: 36: 97:. Had Colsefini been in Slipknot when they were commercially successful, this would have been a speedy keep under 182:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
108:"it is often most appropriate to use redirects in place of articles on side projects, early bands and such" 103:"contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable" 135: 49: 168: 156: 140: 126: 76: 52: 112: 98: 65: 58: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
149: 94: 73: 152:; no evidence of nontrivial coverage by reliable sources with which to expand anything. 165: 153: 115:
for the two albums to be issued on a major label: the requirement is that the artist
123: 90: 176:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 117:"has released two or more albums on a major label 186:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 101:which states that a group qualifies if it 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 64:I think this article doesn't pass 24: 105:. However, it goes on to say that 48:; no consensus in what form. -- 1: 169:00:25, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 157:22:45, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 141:21:19, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 127:20:43, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 77:19:43, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 53:15:27, 28 October 2006 (UTC) 203: 179:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 134:- allow for expansion 194: 181: 150:Anders Colsefini 138: 95:Anders Colsefini 34: 202: 201: 197: 196: 195: 193: 192: 191: 190: 184:deletion review 177: 136: 62: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 200: 198: 189: 188: 172: 171: 159: 143: 129: 61: 56: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 199: 187: 185: 180: 174: 173: 170: 167: 163: 160: 158: 155: 151: 147: 144: 142: 139: 133: 130: 128: 125: 121: 120: 114: 110: 109: 104: 100: 96: 92: 88: 84: 81: 80: 79: 78: 75: 71: 67: 60: 57: 55: 54: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 178: 175: 161: 145: 131: 118: 116: 107: 106: 102: 86: 82: 69: 63: 50:Sam Blanning 45: 43: 31: 28: 74:TheRingess 72:or merge. 166:Easyas12c 154:Melchoir 113:WP:MUSIC 99:WP:MUSIC 91:Slipknot 87:Redirect 66:WP:Music 59:Painface 124:Ac@osr 70:Delete 146:Merge 83:Merge 16:< 162:Keep 132:Keep 46:keep 148:to 93:or 89:to 85:or 164:-- 137:PT 122:.

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Sam Blanning
15:27, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Painface
WP:Music
TheRingess
19:43, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Slipknot
Anders Colsefini
WP:MUSIC
WP:MUSIC
Ac@osr
20:43, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
PT
21:19, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Anders Colsefini
Melchoir
22:45, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Easyas12c
00:25, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
deletion review

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.