56:
believe it. She looks like shes 30 and shes had a kid and shes just fat and people find this stuff sexy? Well, like I said, she is not notable, also look a her page, it says NOTHING about her, just advertisements and stuff about sex dolls and I dont know what else. I really wanna hear from women here because I think some men who have deviated from a godly path might be attracted to this kinda junk so we need some less-biased voices around here to show their opinions, I think theyll agree with me. Thanks and let the Wiki keep rocking!
55:
VfD. I mean, this is just lunacy. Plus one more very important additional reason is that she is even LESS notable than
Chelsea Charms because she is not as big as her and is not the biggest in the world or whatever, which is a horrible title to have anyway. Who here finds her attractive? I just cant
27:
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for
Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
201:; David, this is not Christian Knowledge. Sorry, but the topic is notable, regardless of how it personally makes you feel. If you don't like it, I would suggest that you stop going to articles about pornographic film actors.
109:. Co-incidently, her name cropped up in a newspaper article I was reading a fortnight ago. I had never heard of her so googled. Needless to say, this entry on Wikepdia told me more than any of the 1000s of other web sites.
378:- I'd say speedy but I want this around for a while. Any VfD that uses deviation from a godly path as a supposed argument for decisions in an encyclopedia must be soundly rebuked and mocked as anti-intellectual hokum.
69:; wiki is not censorship; keep in mind that there are people who might find your comment about a godly path offensive; and I would add that you obviously had a good look at the appropriate pages :)
446:. Knowledge has a huge number of entries for actors and actresses, both pornographic and otherwise. I don't see any particular reason why 'Pandora Peaks' is much different than all the others.
233:
User:Pirate2000. There are literally dozens of articles about models, actresses and porn stars on wikipedia. Why delete this and keep
Brianna Banks, or Julia Roberts for that matter?
388:- And another one deviated from a godly path. Wait, I'm gay - oh well, same difference, still keep, still deviated. BTW, how about deviating those "Decency" fellows from the WP? --
121:
See comments above. Providing free publicity for porn merchants is not one of the Five
Pillars of Knowledge, so it is legitimate to object to it. I am not religious by the way.
275:. More importantly, the phrase where "The most important thing to remember about Votes for Deletion, especially for newcomers who are unfamiliar with it, is that
299:
304:
294:
272:
211:
144:
339:. I like masturbating to Knowledge. ...Erm, I mean it's an encyclopaedic entry. There's nothing about it that should warrant deletion.
17:
536:
134:
article because I object to giving them free publicity. Pretending that things don't exist does not make them go away.
470:. 1) I love you Project2501a 2) I hate to suggest bad faith but David keeps putting porn stars on VfD. Knowledge is
535:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an
271:. Notable. No offense, DavidsCrusader, but your POV means nothing to anyone but yourself. Please refer to the
205:
138:
494:
478:
462:
450:
438:
413:
404:
392:
370:
358:
346:
317:
313:
283:
263:
260:
243:
216:
189:
177:
149:
125:
113:
99:
87:
73:
60:
39:
85:
57:
280:
256:
251:. She's no oil painting, for sure (and I must stop checking these pages at work!), but not looking like
474:
censored for the protection of minors! This is annoying as hell and I'm close to filing an RfC, sorry.
82:
355:
491:
521:
507:
367:
240:
202:
135:
487:
517:
459:
310:
343:
252:
503:
475:
410:
160:
52:
36:
516:
Of course we should keep this page - next thing you know DC will want to cover up the
490:
cluttering up
Knowledge! The time and effort should be spent on makin some CA$ HOLA. -
447:
435:
401:
379:
186:
70:
45:
330:
131:
122:
96:
95:. Notable. Your definition of what is offensive may not be the same as others. --
340:
224:
174:
366:
and crossing my fingers hoping the charming WikiDecency project gets deleted.
389:
110:
51:
If you want to know my reasons, they are the same as the ones I gave in the
422:
199:"I think some men who have deviated from a godly path might be attracted"
173:— Lack of attractiveness as a VfD nomination criteria? Keep per above. —
529:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
458:. *fap*fap*fap*fap*fap*fap*fap*fap*fap*fap*fap*fap*fap*fap*
130:
With all due respect, Bhoeble, then we should delete the
259:22:01, 16 August 2005 (UTC) Not logged in, D'oh!
539:). No further edits should be made to this page.
255:or offending people is no reason for deletion.
8:
300:Knowledge:Votes for deletion/Chelsea Charms
305:Knowledge:Votes for deletion/Casey James
295:Knowledge:Votes for deletion/SaRenna Lee
277:it is about the article, not about you.
400:. Ridiculous grounds for nomination.
7:
24:
421:, I see nothing wrong with this.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
486:we dont need whores like this
81:Clueless newbie nomination. --
1:
31:The result of the debate was
510:05:05, August 20, 2005 (UTC)
382:00:27, August 18, 2005 (UTC)
333:00:50, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
227:17:27, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
185:, same as Chelsea Charms. --
167:15:23, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
495:06:54, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
479:00:33, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
463:13:53, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
451:13:10, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
439:05:00, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
414:03:46, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
405:03:29, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
393:00:35, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
371:23:51, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
359:21:04, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
347:20:25, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
318:00:24, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
284:23:39, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
273:Guide to Votes for deletion
264:22:02, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
244:19:46, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
217:16:56, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
190:16:14, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
178:15:40, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
150:16:56, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
126:15:02, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
114:13:41, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
100:13:31, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
88:13:24, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
74:12:10, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
61:11:59, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
40:09:28, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
556:
532:Please do not modify it.
329:- quite notable. --
537:undeletion request
518:Spirit_of_Justice
315:
239:per Howcheng. --
547:
534:
473:
432:
429:
426:
314:
281:Joe Beaudoin Jr.
261:Sabine's Sunbird
165:
555:
554:
550:
549:
548:
546:
545:
544:
543:
530:
471:
430:
427:
424:
409:Definite keep.
356:Pavel Vozenilek
253:Natalie Portman
161:
49:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
553:
551:
542:
541:
525:
524:
511:
497:
481:
465:
453:
441:
416:
407:
395:
383:
373:
368:CanadianCaesar
361:
349:
334:
323:
322:
321:
320:
307:
302:
297:
286:
266:
246:
234:
228:
219:
192:
180:
168:
154:
153:
152:
116:
103:
102:
90:
76:
58:DavidsCrusader
53:Chelsea Charms
48:
43:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
552:
540:
538:
533:
527:
526:
523:
519:
515:
512:
509:
505:
501:
498:
496:
493:
489:
485:
482:
480:
477:
469:
466:
464:
461:
457:
454:
452:
449:
445:
442:
440:
437:
433:
420:
417:
415:
412:
408:
406:
403:
399:
396:
394:
391:
387:
384:
381:
377:
374:
372:
369:
365:
362:
360:
357:
353:
350:
348:
345:
342:
338:
335:
332:
328:
325:
324:
319:
316:
312:
308:
306:
303:
301:
298:
296:
293:
292:
291:. See also:
290:
287:
285:
282:
278:
274:
270:
267:
265:
262:
258:
257:69.12.131.148
254:
250:
247:
245:
242:
241:Several Times
238:
235:
232:
229:
226:
223:
220:
218:
215:
214:
209:
208:
204:
203:Fernando Rizo
200:
196:
193:
191:
188:
184:
181:
179:
176:
172:
169:
166:
164:
158:
155:
151:
148:
147:
142:
141:
137:
136:Fernando Rizo
133:
129:
128:
127:
124:
120:
117:
115:
112:
108:
105:
104:
101:
98:
94:
91:
89:
86:
84:
80:
77:
75:
72:
68:
65:
64:
63:
62:
59:
54:
47:
46:Pandora Peaks
44:
42:
41:
38:
34:
29:
19:
531:
528:
513:
502:. Notable.
499:
483:
467:
460:Project2501a
455:
443:
418:
397:
385:
375:
363:
351:
336:
326:
311:Tony Sidaway
288:
276:
268:
248:
236:
230:
221:
212:
206:
198:
194:
182:
170:
162:
156:
145:
139:
132:Ku Klux Klan
118:
106:
92:
83:Ryan Delaney
78:
66:
50:
32:
30:
26:
398:Speedy keep
337:Speedy keep
237:Speedy keep
183:Speedy keep
79:Speedy keep
504:Superm401
492:Wiffle0rz
488:Fuck Hole
476:Redwolf24
411:Everyking
163:tregoweth
37:Redwolf24
522:Karmafan
448:Nortonew
402:23skidoo
380:DreamGuy
187:Howcheng
71:Lectonar
331:Noitall
123:Bhoeble
97:GraemeL
484:Delete
344:(talk)
341:KeithD
225:Sliggy
119:Delete
390:AlexR
279:" --
111:Markb
16:<
520:. -
514:Keep
508:Talk
500:Keep
468:Keep
456:Keep
444:Keep
436:Talk
419:Keep
386:Keep
376:Keep
364:Keep
352:Keep
327:Keep
289:Keep
269:Keep
249:Keep
231:Keep
222:Keep
195:Keep
171:Keep
157:Keep
107:Keep
93:Keep
67:Keep
33:Keep
472:NOT
175:RJH
159:.
506:|
434:|
423:—
354:,
309:--
197:.
35:.
431:P
428:I
425:J
213:C
210:/
207:T
146:C
143:/
140:T
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.