55:. Sufficient consents exists here to merge and redirect; however several different locations have been brought up, and that is the question here. I'm going to close this as a merge to Ellen Pao, being that it was brought up several times within the discussion and there was no consensus for another location. That being said, if anyone wants to put minimal content about the term into a lawsuit article, I don't think it should be a problem (assuming it's relevant, of course).
745:. Right now, this term has sources to illustrate notability, but I don't think the article effectively illustrates why this term can't simply be included in a biography of Ellen Pao, which would include, necessarily, information on her impact in her field. If there were perhaps more info on the history and development of the term, then an article for its linguistics use could be made, but the origin of the term is pretty straightforward... Anyway, merge with Ellen Pao!
413:. The topic is quite separate from the person and describes the formation of a legal precident. The article is not about the lawsuit or the person. The topic has gained wide-spread acceptance as described in the sources. Unreliable sources, which are not used in the article, show that the topic is a major topic of discussion in legal blogs and other forms of online discussions. It is not a little used term and has gained widespread acceptance.
397:. This article can be fixed through normal editing. The creator of the article and other editors should be given more time to develop the article. Since other editors have some questions regarding the article expressed here in this AfD, perhaps such concerns should be expressed on the talk page of the article so that they can be addressed there as suggested by
801:. It's not a simple vote page, and as other people's comments above mine illustrate, this is a space to discuss the merits and shortcomings of the article. It's problematic I think to splinter the discussion into different pages. That said, you're free to expand the article as this discussion continues.
660:. Since the phrase refers to the trial, I don't see why we can't discuss it there. Since a merge has already been done, I guess it's not necessary. If this begins to overwhelm the parent article, it can be split off, but creating a separate article currently seems like overkill.
338:
The term is used in Forbes, Al
Jazeera, and other news outlets. My quick search turned up a number of hits using the term. It's being used a lot... often as the whole subject of the article. If the article can't be expanded on its own now, a merge with redirect makes
634:
is mentioned a number of times in sources, but it's a term about the effect of a case (or its plaintiff in filing that suit), and we already have an article about the case. A notable neologism? Maybe, but that doesn't mean it needs a stand-alone article. I just
725:. Has adequate notability due to major sources (Fortune, CNBC, etc.) A bit light to stand alone, but If merged, for sure keep the redirect; as noted, if the term continues to expand in use, could be spun off again.
182:
249:
639:
the relevant section in the article about the case, using some of the sources in this article. There's not really any need for a merge, rather than a redirect, but that's the end result here. —
401:. The topic “Pao effect” is a separate topic and differs from content contained in the article about Pao. This term is used in refs 1, 3, 4, and 5. A further search for sources resulted in
356:
There are indeed several articles about the subject in reliable sources, but sufficient time has not lapsed to verify if this term is fleeting or permanent. It should be mentioned in both
135:
780:
680:
433:
274:
482:- Though not reliable sources, these references are from blogs that use the term "Pao effect" in their discussions, indicating that the topic is indeed used widely.
176:
763:
This article was nominated for deletion shorty after it was created. If it wasn’t for this nomination this article would most probably be better developed by now.
307:, which doesn't mention it at the moment) seems more appropriate at the moment. If the term gains widespread acceptance, then it can be made it's own full article.
487:
287:
262:
364:. If over time the term is still in use, would justify its own article as is an effect upon other's actions not part of either Pao's actions or her suit.
517:
Some of those blogs are just duplicates or links to the actual articles, some are commercial in nature. It doesn't demonstrate anything at all.
278:
253:
142:
398:
17:
410:
406:
495:
317:
108:
103:
798:
112:
594:
197:
833:
164:
40:
95:
761:
I don't think the article effectively illustrates why this term can't simply be included in a biography of Ellen Pao
665:
608:
344:
498:. These blogs do not add verifiability to the topic, they merely demonstrate the widespread use of the term.
158:
578:
788:
768:
722:
688:
657:
627:
544:
441:
361:
304:
829:
661:
522:
386:
236:
218:
36:
154:
810:
792:
754:
733:
713:
692:
669:
648:
612:
557:
526:
512:
474:
445:
427:
373:
348:
330:
291:
266:
240:
222:
77:
604:
340:
731:
641:
491:
190:
70:
325:
204:
709:
313:
779:
In the interest of keeping this deletion-vote-page clutter-free please join discussions on the
806:
784:
764:
750:
684:
577:
Why merge a vocabulary-related article with a lawsuit-related article? How would one go about
553:
437:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
828:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
539:
321:
58:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
518:
508:
423:
369:
232:
214:
631:
458:
394:
99:
390:
170:
726:
483:
470:
402:
64:
382:
705:
309:
802:
774:
746:
572:
549:
129:
504:
419:
365:
797:
The purpose of this deletion page is to discuss it, Ottawahitech, according to
91:
83:
742:
704:. This seems to be part of her impact on society, not a standalone article.
701:
465:
357:
300:
51:
681:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for deletion/Pao effect § merge with redirect
582:
213:
Fails GNG, vauge coverage of a term coined for a single news article.
231:- vague, little used term. Few sources. Fails general notability.
822:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
597:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
250:
list of
Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions
636:
125:
121:
117:
457:, as this has certainly become its own phenomenon per
189:
460:
Silicon Valley attorneys: Already seeing a Pao effect
434:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for deletion/Pao effect
381:- This stub meets all the requirements of notability
603:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
203:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
836:). No further edits should be made to this page.
275:list of Language-related deletion discussions
8:
273:Note: This debate has been included in the
248:Note: This debate has been included in the
272:
247:
799:Knowledge (XXG)'s own deletion guidelines
301:Ellen Pao#Gender discrimination lawsuit
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
393:, and what Knowledge (XXG) is not
24:
771:) 10:12, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
432:Please see offtopic discussion:
811:16:15, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
793:10:19, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
755:22:36, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
734:06:07, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
714:14:42, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
693:12:59, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
670:04:21, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
649:18:37, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
613:04:43, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
558:17:59, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
527:02:29, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
513:17:42, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
475:16:27, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
446:11:05, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
428:10:38, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
374:13:50, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
349:12:26, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
331:12:17, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
292:09:30, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
267:09:30, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
241:03:29, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
223:01:59, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
78:18:09, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
1:
540:too many forks at this table
719:Keep or Merge with redirect
336:Keep or merge with redirect
284:...........................
259:...........................
853:
759:What an unfair statement:
678:
548:into this, or vice-versa.
825:Please do not modify it.
399:WP:Articles for deletion
32:Please do not modify it.
542:. Please, let's merge
723:Pao v. Kleiner Perkins
658:Pao v. Kleiner Perkins
628:Pao v. Kleiner Perkins
545:Pao_v._Kleiner_Perkins
362:Pao v. Kleiner Perkins
305:Pao v. Kleiner Perkins
739:Merge with redirect
389:, reliable sources
354:Merge with redirect
615:
294:
269:
62:
59:non-admin closure
844:
827:
778:
762:
729:
662:NinjaRobotPirate
646:
644:
602:
600:
598:
576:
511:
496:and another blog
426:
385:, verifiability
329:
283:
258:
208:
207:
193:
145:
133:
115:
76:
73:
67:
56:
34:
852:
851:
847:
846:
845:
843:
842:
841:
840:
834:deletion review
823:
772:
760:
727:
683:
642:
640:
616:
605:Spirit of Eagle
593:
591:
570:
509:leave a message
503:
484:a law firm blog
424:leave a message
418:
341:Megalibrarygirl
308:
279:
254:
150:
141:
106:
90:
87:
71:
65:
63:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
850:
848:
839:
838:
818:
817:
816:
815:
814:
813:
736:
716:
695:
672:
651:
643:Rhododendrites
601:
590:
589:
588:
587:
586:
581:the resulting
561:
560:
532:
531:
530:
529:
500:
499:
477:
451:
450:
449:
448:
415:
414:
376:
351:
333:
299:A redirect to
296:
295:
270:
244:
243:
211:
210:
147:
86:
81:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
849:
837:
835:
831:
826:
820:
819:
812:
808:
804:
800:
796:
795:
794:
790:
786:
782:
776:
770:
766:
758:
757:
756:
752:
748:
744:
740:
737:
735:
732:
730:
724:
720:
717:
715:
711:
707:
703:
699:
696:
694:
690:
686:
682:
676:
673:
671:
667:
663:
659:
655:
652:
650:
645:
638:
633:
629:
625:
621:
618:
617:
614:
610:
606:
599:
596:
584:
580:
574:
568:
565:
564:
563:
562:
559:
555:
551:
547:
546:
541:
537:
534:
533:
528:
524:
520:
516:
515:
514:
510:
506:
502:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
481:
478:
476:
472:
468:
467:
462:
461:
456:
453:
452:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
430:
429:
425:
421:
417:
416:
412:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
377:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
352:
350:
346:
342:
337:
334:
332:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
306:
303:(or possibly
302:
298:
297:
293:
289:
285:
282:
276:
271:
268:
264:
260:
257:
251:
246:
245:
242:
238:
234:
230:
227:
226:
225:
224:
220:
216:
206:
202:
199:
196:
192:
188:
184:
181:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
156:
153:
152:Find sources:
148:
144:
140:
137:
131:
127:
123:
119:
114:
110:
105:
101:
97:
93:
89:
88:
85:
82:
80:
79:
74:
68:
60:
54:
53:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
824:
821:
785:Ottawahitech
765:Ottawahitech
738:
718:
697:
685:Ottawahitech
674:
653:
623:
619:
592:
579:categorizing
566:
543:
538:- there are
535:
492:another blog
488:another blog
479:
464:
459:
454:
438:Ottawahitech
378:
353:
335:
280:
255:
228:
212:
200:
194:
186:
179:
173:
167:
161:
151:
138:
49:
47:
31:
28:
519:Mrfrobinson
233:Magnolia677
215:Mrfrobinson
177:free images
679:See also:
92:Pao effect
84:Pao effect
830:talk page
781:talk page
743:Ellen Pao
728:Montanabw
702:Ellen Pao
632:neologism
358:Ellen Pao
66:Kharkiv07
52:Ellen Pao
50:merge to
37:talk page
832:or in a
706:Dimadick
654:Redirect
624:Redirect
595:Relisted
585:article?
583:mishmash
567:Question
318:contribs
310:Headbomb
136:View log
39:or in a
803:Fuzchia
775:Fuzchia
747:Fuzchia
675:Comment
637:rewrote
573:Bearian
550:Bearian
536:Comment
480:Comment
322:physics
183:WPÂ refs
171:scholar
109:protect
104:history
630:- The
505:Bfpage
420:Bfpage
395:WP:NOT
366:SusunW
339:sense.
281:1Wiki8
256:1Wiki8
229:Delete
155:Google
113:delete
698:Merge
620:Merge
391:WP:RS
387:WP:V)
326:books
277:. --
252:. --
198:JSTOR
159:books
143:Stats
130:views
122:watch
118:links
16:<
807:talk
789:talk
769:talk
751:talk
710:talk
689:talk
666:talk
609:talk
554:talk
523:talk
471:talk
466:Cirt
463:. —
455:Keep
442:talk
411:this
407:this
403:this
383:WP:N
379:Keep
370:talk
360:and
345:talk
314:talk
288:talk
263:talk
237:talk
219:talk
191:FENS
165:news
126:logs
100:talk
96:edit
741:to
721:to
700:to
656:to
647:\\
626:to
205:TWL
134:– (
809:)
791:)
783:.
753:)
712:)
691:)
677::
668:)
611:)
569::
556:)
525:)
494:,
490:,
486:,
473:)
444:)
436:.
409:,
372:)
347:)
324:/
320:/
316:/
290:)
265:)
239:)
221:)
185:)
128:|
124:|
120:|
116:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
805:(
787:(
777::
773:@
767:(
749:(
708:(
687:(
664:(
622:/
607:(
575::
571:@
552:(
521:(
507:|
469:(
440:(
422:|
405:,
368:(
343:(
328:}
312:{
286:(
261:(
235:(
217:(
209:)
201:·
195:·
187:·
180:·
174:·
168:·
162:·
157:(
149:(
146:)
139:·
132:)
94:(
75:)
72:T
69:(
61:)
57:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.