282:. No, members are not notable simply by virtue of their membership, which is why I haven't recommended keeping without looking through the potential sources that I found. However membership of the central committee of an organisation that represents over 500 million people is a good indication that substantial coverage in reliable sources will probably exist, so it's worth having a careful look for them before deciding what to do with this article. Have you tried looking for Korean sources? I'm afraid my ability to search is limited to the Latin alphabet (or Cyrillic at a stretch).
159:, please. I agree with CyberGhostface about notability. To be a member of committeeis good, but many professor and priest/reverend beloning the committee. The committee is maybe notable, but not to member of the committee. If somebody famous, maybe they should wait until another editor decide to write the article.
204:
208:
258:, Phil Bridger. However, are members of the committee notable simply through their membership? Also, I add the perspective by letting you know that their isno page for this *Park Seong-won in korean wikipedia
230:
355:, etc. So maybe they could class the "reliable sources". And Phil Bridger resarch show that Park Seong-won is author of book chapter on church history in volume published by mainstream publsiher
472:
the importance of the body is sufficiently great that each individual person is notable. Just like any top level international body for a major profession. He's there as the representative of
377:
406:. I understand the points made above, but the bottom line is that independent news coverage in English of him is practically nonexistent, and this is the English Knowledge (XXG).--
125:
324:
200:
427:. The "English" in "English Knowledge (XXG)" simply refers to the language in which it is written. It isn't a restriction on what sources can be used.
172:. I change after I look at the google's search results given by Phil Bridger. We can see academic actvities and publication, religious activity of the
349:
176:, in English and Korean. I change to keep and also perhaps the editor will dispense with the superfluous detail on the family of the Park Seong-won.
476:, also a major international body. The professorship is probably notable also, though I cannot judge adequately for lack of sources I can read.
348:. A websearch on the Korean for Park Seong-won (박성원) did not yielding good result. But I addition of "WCC" and I received many results on Naver
473:
301:. Yes, in the search link you provided I can see a few results in Korean. I will look them further, and add as the source if relevant.
92:
87:
17:
96:
211:, but I don't have time to go through them in detail at the moment. Conflict of interest is a reason for editing, not deletion.
79:
502:
36:
196:
501:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
241:
145:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
487:
461:
436:
415:
389:
367:
339:
310:
291:
270:
245:
220:
185:
149:
56:
432:
287:
216:
411:
195:. This isn't just any old committee that the subject's a member of, it's the Central Committee of the
385:
237:
141:
137:
83:
428:
283:
212:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
399:
407:
403:
133:
381:
335:
173:
75:
62:
483:
363:
306:
266:
181:
164:
455:
356:
351:. In Korean result, their is the report of the mainstream Korean newspaper such as
50:
113:
352:
448:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
331:
478:
359:
302:
262:
177:
160:
495:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
132:
Non-notable, little references, and there is a serious bit of
231:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
120:
109:
105:
101:
398:. Does not seem to pass notability requirements under
254:
Yes, that is a good point about the notability of the
69:
Discussion to run until at least 8 February 2009 (UTC)
453:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
378:list of Living people-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
505:). No further edits should be made to this page.
259:
203:. He seems to get a fair number of mentions in
8:
325:list of Korea-related deletion discussions
323:: This debate has been included in the
229:: This debate has been included in the
376:: This debate has been included in the
136:as well as the article is written by
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
474:World Alliance of Reformed Churches
24:
167:) 16:17, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
1:
57:16:34, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
488:03:49, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
462:21:42, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
437:11:11, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
416:02:08, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
390:00:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
368:20:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
340:17:26, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
311:18:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
292:18:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
271:17:17, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
246:17:09, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
221:16:29, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
186:18:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
150:15:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
522:
197:World Council of Churches
498:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
201:159 people belong to it
134:Conflict of interest
138:User:Park Seong-won
205:these news sources
44:The result was
464:
392:
342:
328:
248:
234:
513:
500:
458:
452:
450:
372:
329:
319:
235:
225:
123:
117:
99:
53:
34:
521:
520:
516:
515:
514:
512:
511:
510:
509:
503:deletion review
496:
456:
446:
119:
90:
74:
66:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
519:
517:
508:
507:
491:
490:
466:
465:
451:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
419:
418:
393:
370:
343:
316:
315:
314:
313:
295:
294:
274:
273:
249:
238:David Eppstein
223:
189:
188:
174:Park Seong-won
142:CyberGhostface
130:
129:
76:Park Seong-won
65:
63:Park Seong-won
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
518:
506:
504:
499:
493:
492:
489:
485:
481:
480:
475:
471:
468:
467:
463:
460:
459:
449:
445:
444:
438:
434:
430:
426:
423:
422:
421:
420:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
394:
391:
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
369:
365:
361:
357:
354:
350:
347:
344:
341:
337:
333:
326:
322:
318:
317:
312:
308:
304:
300:
297:
296:
293:
289:
285:
281:
278:
277:
276:
275:
272:
268:
264:
260:
257:
253:
250:
247:
243:
239:
232:
228:
224:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
191:
190:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
166:
162:
158:
154:
153:
152:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
127:
122:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
71:
70:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
497:
494:
477:
469:
454:
447:
429:Phil Bridger
424:
395:
373:
345:
320:
298:
284:Phil Bridger
279:
255:
251:
226:
213:Phil Bridger
192:
169:
156:
155:
131:
68:
67:
49:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
408:Eric Yurken
353:Kukmin Ilbo
209:these books
382:Erwin85Bot
256:committee
126:View log
457:MBisanz
425:Comment
400:WP:PROF
346:Comment
299:Comment
280:Comment
252:Comment
193:Comment
93:protect
88:history
52:MBisanz
404:WP:BIO
396:Delete
157:Delete
121:delete
97:delete
124:) – (
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
484:talk
470:Keep
433:talk
412:talk
386:talk
380:. --
374:Note
364:talk
336:talk
332:PC78
321:Note
307:talk
288:talk
267:talk
242:talk
227:Note
217:talk
207:and
182:talk
170:Keep
165:talk
146:talk
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
479:DGG
402:or
360:Nxo
327:.
303:Nxo
263:Nxo
233:.
178:Nxo
161:Nxo
486:)
435:)
414:)
388:)
366:)
338:)
309:)
290:)
269:)
261:.
244:)
219:)
199:.
184:)
148:)
140:.
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
48:.
482:(
431:(
410:(
384:(
362:(
358:.
334:(
330:—
305:(
286:(
265:(
240:(
236:—
215:(
180:(
163:(
144:(
128:)
118:(
116:)
78:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.