83:
78:
87:
206:
per 2 independent references, which is about 2 more than 70% of the
Knowledge (XXG) articles. Previous comment confirm the organization is discussed in the articles. They do not have to be the primary subject.
70:
146:. Once you strip out the issue soapboxing, what you're left with is a brief (unsourced) article about one advocacy group, among very many, that doesn't demonstrate that it's a notable group. (Compare
190:
It appears both the added references are long, extensive articles about the issue, but with only very brief mentions of this group, buried deep in the articles.
147:
352:
340:
328:
316:
304:
292:
275:
256:
240:
211:
194:
178:
166:
154:
138:
116:
52:
48:
as no evidence of non-trivial independent coverage presented. Passing mentions do not suffice, and promoting a particular cause certainly does not. --
283:
There still is alot in the way of sources, and the article seems to be soapboxy. Generally, a unique and noble purpose does not make one notable.--
174:. I added some references. I think that the references in the article prove that the Partners Task Force for Gay & Lesbian Couples is notable. --
74:
66:
58:
324:- I was tempted to go through and put {{fact}} and {{pov}} tags throughout the entire thing. Being "noble" doesn't mean notareity.
17:
288:
367:
36:
348:
per
Toptomcat. If it's a bona fide public advocacy group, in the news, and it seems to be, it merits inclusion.
112:
A non-notable group. Despite cleanup this article still reads reads like a mixture of soapbox and advertising.
366:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
221:
349:
269:
49:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
131:
265:
337:
113:
325:
313:
237:
191:
175:
151:
104:
301:
284:
208:
126:
253:
163:
252:
Let's not be WP:N nazis about this, this seems to be adequately referenced. -
150:, for example, which does demonstrate notability and cites references.)
236:(emphasis added). Two brief mentions would not seem to satisfy that.
360:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
264:. The organisation exists, and its purpose makes it notable. --
100:
96:
92:
312:. A noble organization working for a noble cause.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
67:Partners Task Force for Gay & Lesbian Couples
59:Partners Task Force for Gay & Lesbian Couples
370:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
353:01:56, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
341:20:32, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
329:22:37, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
317:09:13, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
305:23:48, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
293:23:02, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
276:19:19, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
257:18:35, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
241:16:23, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
212:16:10, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
195:16:08, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
179:07:26, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
167:05:22, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
155:03:05, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
139:01:47, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
117:01:43, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
53:20:55, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
234:non-trivial published works"
220:Actually, the criterion per
387:
226:"a topic is notable if it
222:Knowledge (XXG):Notability
363:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
228:has been the subject
350:Shawn in Montreal
378:
365:
272:
135:
129:
108:
90:
34:
386:
385:
381:
380:
379:
377:
376:
375:
374:
368:deletion review
361:
291:
270:
133:
127:
81:
65:
62:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
384:
382:
373:
372:
356:
355:
343:
331:
319:
307:
295:
287:
278:
259:
246:
245:
244:
243:
215:
214:
200:
199:
198:
197:
182:
181:
169:
157:
141:
110:
109:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
383:
371:
369:
364:
358:
357:
354:
351:
347:
344:
342:
339:
335:
332:
330:
327:
323:
320:
318:
315:
311:
308:
306:
303:
299:
296:
294:
290:
286:
282:
279:
277:
273:
267:
263:
260:
258:
255:
251:
248:
247:
242:
239:
235:
233:
229:
223:
219:
218:
217:
216:
213:
210:
205:
202:
201:
196:
193:
189:
186:
185:
184:
183:
180:
177:
173:
170:
168:
165:
161:
158:
156:
153:
149:
145:
142:
140:
137:
136:
130:
124:
121:
120:
119:
118:
115:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
362:
359:
345:
336:Not notable
333:
321:
309:
297:
280:
261:
249:
231:
227:
225:
203:
187:
171:
159:
143:
132:
122:
111:
50:Sam Blanning
45:
43:
31:
28:
162:per above.
271:Μελ Ετητης
266:Mel Etitis
254:Toptomcat
204:Weak keep
125:per nom.
114:Akihabara
326:SkierRMH
314:Maddy626
300:per nom
238:Fan-1967
232:multiple
192:Fan-1967
176:Eastmain
152:Fan-1967
338:Fabhcún
188:Comment
84:protect
79:history
334:Delete
322:Delete
302:Just H
298:Delete
285:danntm
281:Delete
209:Edison
160:Delete
144:Delete
123:Delete
88:delete
46:delete
250:Keep.
164:MER-C
148:GLAAD
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
346:Keep
310:Keep
262:Keep
172:Keep
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
230:of
224:is
134:top
128:Big
274:)
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
289:C
268:(
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.