330:
288:
criterion #5 applies or not. Is Shute considered a major enough figure in
English letters? On that, his biographical article doesn't have much to say about major literary honours. Indeed, a Google search has difficulty pulling up literary criticism of this book, but it may be just because I don't
172:
353:
I found two reviews and evidence of a third one from the London
Spectator, although for some reason I'm having difficulty pulling it up with my school database. I'll add it to the article just so the citation is there.
166:
125:
244:
222:, which was just the first potential source that I found in a few seconds. Not having sources in an article is not a reason for deletion - we need to check whether sources
264:
219:
378:
has only been digitised as far back as 2001. At least the Nexis and Gale
Cengage databases subscribed to by my university library only go back that far.
132:
98:
93:
102:
85:
420:
379:
227:
187:
402:: my rule of thumb for GNG is three reliable sources. I wasn't able to find them but thanks to some very good work, we now have them.
154:
17:
148:
464:
40:
407:
315:
294:
272:
252:
144:
445:
428:
411:
387:
365:
344:
319:
298:
276:
256:
235:
212:
67:
89:
218:
What makes you think that this book is non-notable? For example, there are several pages of coverage about it in
194:
424:
383:
231:
208:
403:
311:
290:
268:
248:
460:
358:
337:
81:
73:
36:
160:
180:
204:
285:
60:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
459:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
55:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
441:
355:
334:
310:
was a very famous work, Shute's status doesn't appear to confer notability on this work.
119:
437:
203:
Non-notable romance novel tagged as unreferenced since
December 2009.
304:
I'll get off the fence + say delete. Doesn't appear to meet NBOOK and
453:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
115:
111:
107:
179:
329:: It seems to have a whole chapter devoted to it in
193:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
467:). No further edits should be made to this page.
419:. I agree that enough coverage has been found.
245:list of Literature-related deletion discussions
8:
265:list of England-related deletion discussions
263:Note: This debate has been included in the
243:Note: This debate has been included in the
284:Then it also becomes a question of whether
262:
242:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
333:. I'll see what else I can find.
226:before making such nominations.
1:
446:02:33, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
429:16:39, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
412:20:05, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
388:11:30, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
366:05:16, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
345:05:06, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
320:14:34, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
299:01:24, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
277:01:18, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
257:01:18, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
68:05:32, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
236:21:57, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
213:21:09, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
484:
456:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
436:per above reasoning,
82:Pastoral (1944 novel)
74:Pastoral (1944 novel)
289:know how to find...
404:Shawn in Montreal
312:Shawn in Montreal
291:Shawn in Montreal
279:
269:Shawn in Montreal
259:
249:Shawn in Montreal
59:
56:non-admin closure
475:
458:
362:
341:
198:
197:
183:
135:
123:
105:
65:
53:
34:
483:
482:
478:
477:
476:
474:
473:
472:
471:
465:deletion review
454:
360:
339:
140:
131:
96:
80:
77:
61:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
481:
479:
470:
469:
449:
448:
434:Clearly a keep
431:
414:
395:
394:
393:
392:
391:
390:
374:It seems that
369:
368:
348:
347:
324:
323:
322:
281:
280:
260:
239:
238:
201:
200:
137:
76:
71:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
480:
468:
466:
462:
457:
451:
450:
447:
443:
439:
435:
432:
430:
426:
422:
421:86.17.222.157
418:
415:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
396:
389:
385:
381:
380:86.17.222.157
377:
376:The Spectator
373:
372:
371:
370:
367:
364:
363:
357:
352:
351:
350:
349:
346:
343:
342:
336:
332:
328:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
302:
301:
300:
296:
292:
287:
283:
282:
278:
274:
270:
266:
261:
258:
254:
250:
246:
241:
240:
237:
233:
229:
228:86.17.222.157
225:
221:
217:
216:
215:
214:
210:
206:
205:GeoffreyT2000
196:
192:
189:
186:
182:
178:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
146:
143:
142:Find sources:
138:
134:
130:
127:
121:
117:
113:
109:
104:
100:
95:
91:
87:
83:
79:
78:
75:
72:
70:
69:
66:
64:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
455:
452:
433:
416:
399:
375:
359:
338:
326:
308:On the Beach
307:
303:
223:
202:
190:
184:
176:
169:
163:
157:
151:
141:
128:
62:
49:
47:
31:
28:
356:Tokyogirl79
335:Tokyogirl79
167:free images
398:Change to
461:talk page
331:this book
220:this book
37:talk page
463:or in a
286:WP:NBOOK
126:View log
39:or in a
361:(｡◕‿◕｡)
340:(｡◕‿◕｡)
327:Comment
173:WP refs
161:scholar
99:protect
94:history
63:Lourdes
438:Sadads
306:while
145:Google
103:delete
224:exist
188:JSTOR
149:books
133:Stats
120:views
112:watch
108:links
16:<
442:talk
425:talk
417:Keep
408:talk
400:Keep
384:talk
316:talk
295:talk
273:talk
253:talk
232:talk
209:talk
181:FENS
155:news
116:logs
90:talk
86:edit
50:keep
195:TWL
124:– (
52:.
444:)
427:)
410:)
386:)
318:)
297:)
275:)
267:.
255:)
247:.
234:)
211:)
175:)
118:|
114:|
110:|
106:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
440:(
423:(
406:(
382:(
314:(
293:(
271:(
251:(
230:(
207:(
199:)
191:·
185:·
177:·
170:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
147:(
139:(
136:)
129:·
122:)
84:(
58:)
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.