403:
in leagues such as the FAI League of
Ireland qualify under the amateur sports bit. It's quite clear that this is not the right way to interpret the guideline, as in that form, it can be used to justify articles on players in (say) the top handball league in England, the top ping pong league in Guyana, or the top division of curling in Kenya. It's quite clear to me (and many others) that the amateur sports part is for sports where there is no professional league anywhere, and thus it is impossible for players to pass
665:. The WP:ATHLETE disclaimer of 'Competitors who have competed at the highest level in amateur sports' applies to global events such as Olympics, World Championships - not the highest level in a particular location. Of course, if someone provides reliable sources to the contrary (which is all that the guidelines assume, if you have performed at x level it is fair to assume coverage exists) I will reconsider.
502:
Looks like that was the right result to me. It was your AfD, if you really did disagree that it was the right result, you should bring it do DRV, rather than trying to game the system, by starting up similiar AfDs. The other two seemed to fly under the radar, not getting near as much attention - I
402:
The change was not particularly meant to affect this discussion, and theoretically there would never be a good time to implement it because sadly I am almost constantly involved in AfDing non-notable athletes. However, the change is necessary to fix the common misinterpretation that players playing
586:
However the majority of teams and players are fully professional. It's the top tier of football in
Ireland. It's completely non-sensical that these players don't meet the spirit of the guidelines. Surely there are better things to do here than to be deleting the top players from small countries.
524:- The League of Ireland is not fully professional. The vast majority of notable Irish players play in the fully professional league system in England, which effectively acts as the top level of competition for Irish football players.
130:
377:
arguments of the form "if you include this, then you have to include all sorts of crap" don't work on me. The Irish football competition is of a similar standard and standing to neighbouring leagues which
572:
game. Per the link given above, there are "four or five" part-time clubs in the League of
Ireland. That means there are fifty or so semi-professional players playing in that league every week.
455:
382:
professional, and vastly higher in standard to San Marino or
Andorra's leagues. Irish teams have consistently been able hold their own against professional teams from Scotland, for instance.
286:
guideline clearly states "fully professional". And yes, the idea is to gradually get rid of all the LOI players who fail to meet the criteria (otherwise why bother having guidelines).
118:
129:
as he has never played in a fully professional league (he never made a first team apperance for his
English clubs, and the Irish ones do not play in a fully pro league.
185:
458:
which I note was closed as a keep no less than 36 minutes before this AfD was started. As that AfD was started by the same person as this one, this is clearly a
312:- If there is no fully professional league in Ireland, and this person has played at the highest level of the semi-professional competition, then he passes
268:
The "part-time" clubs in the League of
Ireland are not amateur, they are semi-professional. Aslo, why not delete all LoI articles in that case?
477:
370:
85:
80:
89:
492:
418:
355:
297:
169:
142:
72:
17:
454:. We've established previously that articles can exist for players in the top league of football in Ireland. Most recently in
155:
336:
Using that logic we should allow players from the top division in
Andorra and San Marino articles (and anyway, football is
235:, having never played in a fully-pro league/competition. Never made an appearance for Stockport or Man City as per his
689:
577:
529:
442:
344:
in its current form (fully professional league) exists for a reason (to stop articles on non-notable sportsmen).
36:
688:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
649:
481:
both of which ended in delete. Just because one AfD had the wrong result doesn't mean we have to repeat it.
674:
653:
632:
596:
581:
559:
533:
512:
497:
471:
446:
423:
397:
360:
331:
302:
277:
260:
245:
222:
204:
174:
147:
54:
257:
476:
No, we haven't established anything of the sort. There were two other AfDs running around the same time,
369:
that affects an open discussion you're heavily involved in, and have therefore changed it back. See the
200:
479:
573:
525:
438:
547:
539:
487:
413:
350:
292:
273:
164:
137:
76:
645:
662:
404:
341:
313:
283:
254:
241:
236:
232:
126:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
550:
on the field, who was unpaid. Do you suggest we delete hundreds of articles for MLS players?
670:
641:
611:
215:
192:
407:
otherwise. As for the third part of your statement, I would add a huge {{fact}} tag to it.
592:
555:
508:
467:
459:
482:
408:
390:
374:
345:
324:
287:
269:
159:
132:
68:
60:
316:
per this bit: "Competitors who have competed at the highest level in amateur sports".
538:
Other leagues aren't fully-professional, but we accept their players. One example is
49:
106:
666:
623:
616:
588:
551:
543:
504:
463:
219:
383:
317:
682:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
282:
The fact that they are semi-professional is irrelevant. The
456:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Neil
Gallagher (footballer)
366:
113:
102:
98:
94:
158:'s list of association football related deletions.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
692:). No further edits should be made to this page.
340:an amateur sport, so that part is irrlevant).
186:list of Athletes-related deletion discussions
8:
542:in North America. As recently as Saturday
184:: This debate has been included in the
365:A few things. Firstly, I object to you
125:Football player who very clearly fails
154:This discussion has been included in
7:
218:. No decent ghits to speak of. --
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
367:changing a Knowledge guideline
55:01:25, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
1:
675:10:53, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
654:08:43, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
633:12:24, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
597:03:45, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
582:18:48, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
560:05:46, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
534:08:05, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
513:04:22, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
498:07:46, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
472:03:47, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
447:22:28, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
424:22:05, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
398:09:33, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
361:07:46, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
332:22:09, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
303:19:40, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
278:19:01, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
261:13:20, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
246:12:11, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
223:12:02, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
205:16:46, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
175:11:43, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
148:11:43, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
709:
685:Please do not modify it.
503:wasn't aware of either.
32:Please do not modify it.
564:Of course not. That is
231:fails notability at
156:WikiProject Football
546:put amateur player
568:player playing in
44:The result was
631:
207:
189:
177:
53:
700:
687:
630:
628:
621:
614:
495:
490:
485:
421:
416:
411:
388:
358:
353:
348:
322:
300:
295:
290:
198:
190:
180:
172:
167:
162:
153:
145:
140:
135:
116:
110:
92:
52:
34:
708:
707:
703:
702:
701:
699:
698:
697:
696:
690:deletion review
683:
624:
617:
615:
574:Jmorrison230582
526:Jmorrison230582
493:
488:
483:
439:Hubschrauber729
419:
414:
409:
394:
384:
356:
351:
346:
328:
318:
298:
293:
288:
237:soccerbase page
193:
170:
165:
160:
143:
138:
133:
112:
83:
67:
64:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
706:
704:
695:
694:
678:
677:
656:
635:
605:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
599:
519:
518:
517:
516:
515:
449:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
392:
375:slippery slope
326:
307:
306:
305:
263:
248:
209:
208:
178:
123:
122:
69:Phillip Reilly
63:
61:Phillip Reilly
58:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
705:
693:
691:
686:
680:
679:
676:
672:
668:
664:
660:
657:
655:
651:
647:
643:
639:
636:
634:
629:
627:
622:
620:
613:
609:
606:
598:
594:
590:
585:
584:
583:
579:
575:
571:
567:
563:
562:
561:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
537:
536:
535:
531:
527:
523:
520:
514:
510:
506:
501:
500:
499:
496:
491:
486:
480:
478:
475:
474:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
450:
448:
444:
440:
436:
433:
425:
422:
417:
412:
406:
401:
400:
399:
396:
395:
389:
387:
381:
376:
372:
368:
364:
363:
362:
359:
354:
349:
343:
339:
335:
334:
333:
330:
329:
323:
321:
315:
311:
308:
304:
301:
296:
291:
285:
281:
280:
279:
275:
271:
267:
264:
262:
259:
256:
252:
249:
247:
244:
243:
238:
234:
230:
227:
226:
225:
224:
221:
217:
213:
206:
203:
202:
199:
196:
187:
183:
179:
176:
173:
168:
163:
157:
152:
151:
150:
149:
146:
141:
136:
131:
128:
120:
115:
108:
104:
100:
96:
91:
87:
82:
78:
74:
70:
66:
65:
62:
59:
57:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
684:
681:
658:
640:per nom and
637:
625:
618:
610:per nom and
607:
569:
565:
521:
462:nomination.
451:
434:
391:
385:
379:
373:. Secondly,
337:
325:
319:
309:
265:
250:
240:
228:
211:
210:
201:
194:
181:
124:
45:
43:
31:
28:
661:as failing
452:Strong Keep
437:- per nom.
663:WP:ATHLETE
548:Rick Titus
544:Toronto FC
405:WP:ATHLETE
342:WP:ATHLETE
314:WP:ATHLETE
284:WP:ATHLETE
233:WP:ATHLETE
127:WP:ATHLETE
642:WP:FOOTYN
612:WP:FOOTYN
371:talk page
310:Weak Keep
270:Juve curr
253:per nom.
216:WP:FOOTYN
460:WP:POINT
214:: fails
119:View log
258:Snowman
86:protect
81:history
667:Nuttah
659:Delete
646:Angelo
638:Delete
608:Delete
522:Delete
484:пﮟოьεԻ
435:Delete
410:пﮟოьεԻ
347:пﮟოьεԻ
289:пﮟოьεԻ
251:Delete
229:Delete
212:Delete
161:пﮟოьεԻ
134:пﮟოьεԻ
114:delete
90:delete
46:delete
589:Nfitz
552:Nfitz
505:Nfitz
464:Nfitz
255:Giant
242:Jimbo
220:Alexf
197:smith
195:Cliff
117:) – (
107:views
99:watch
95:links
16:<
671:talk
650:talk
644:. --
593:talk
578:talk
556:talk
530:talk
509:talk
468:talk
443:talk
386:Reyk
320:Reyk
274:talk
266:Keep
239:. --
182:Note
103:logs
77:talk
73:edit
626:Ray
619:Ban
570:one
566:one
540:MLS
393:YO!
380:are
338:not
327:YO!
188:.
673:)
652:)
595:)
580:)
558:)
532:)
511:)
470:)
445:)
276:)
105:|
101:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
79:|
75:|
50:BJ
48:.
669:(
648:(
591:(
576:(
554:(
528:(
507:(
494:7
489:5
466:(
441:(
420:7
415:5
357:7
352:5
299:7
294:5
272:(
191:—
171:7
166:5
144:7
139:5
121:)
111:(
109:)
71:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.