208:"Rikets røst" is a notable show that IMO should have an article, yes. If being a national celebrity, appearing on a notable TV show and being connected to the royal family in a country with 4.5 million people qualifies for notability, then Pia Haraldsen stays in the English Knowledge (XXG). If that is not enough, she doesn't.
193:
Well it's good to get your perspective, because many of the links in the article are red. For example, the show you mention is red-linked. I am completely ignorant of
Norwegian pop-culture, so I would (naively) assume that the show isnt notable enough for an article, so neither is her appearance.
183:
I am a
Norwegian myself and I am quite sure most Norwegians know who she is. The fact that she will appear on the "Rikets røst" show (as mentioned in the article) makes her more noteable, as that is a popular show here. The fact that she hasn't done anything to deserve fame (not as far as I know)
239:
the material about the connection to the royal family is absurd: "step-daughter of the niece of Queen Sonja of Norway, " She's not actually a relative. This is straining after N. We would best remedy the lack of an article on Hoel by writing one, not be keeping this.
198:
or whether the redlink is due to un-notability in general. It's clear she's notable in Norway. My question to you: Would she be considered notable to the
English-speaking world? Is she worthy of an entry in the English WP? Thanks for you comments! -
173:
anything notable. That's my motivation for this AfD. I would vote "weak delete" personally, but I certainly understand your "weak keep." I'm hoping we can get someone in-the-know here to help make a good case in one direction or the other. -
144:- I would say her family connection to Queen Sonja of Norway counts as an assertion of notability, but there is only one external source. More evidence of multiple coverage by independent sources is needed to establish notability per
266:
is also the former editor of the
Norwegian version of Cosmopolitan, how she became a celeb is beyond me, but she's in the press all the time. 22700 ghits with 430 unique hits for "Pia Haraldsen"
121:
129:
169:
Exactly. She does appear to have some celebrity status in Norway (as there are lots of hits in
Norwegian), and she does have some family ties... but she really hasn't
267:
284:
282:
17:
94:
89:
98:
81:
280:
301:
36:
300:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
275:
149:
286:
258:
246:
221:
212:
203:
188:
178:
164:
152:
135:
63:
270:
160:, although she has not really done anything of notice, she is for some reason a celebrity in Norway.
85:
57:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
255:
145:
77:
69:
218:
200:
175:
132:
50:
115:
242:
209:
185:
161:
294:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
128:
Not notable. Google does not return much about her (in
English)
194:
It's hard to judge whether WP just doesn't have an article
111:
107:
103:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
304:). No further edits should be made to this page.
131:and the article makes no claims to notability.
8:
148:. Delete unless article is improved.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
217:Alright. Thanks for the guidance! -
24:
1:
287:19:16, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
259:13:53, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
247:03:58, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
222:01:38, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
213:22:17, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
204:18:43, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
189:18:30, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
184:doesn't make her less famous.
179:17:53, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
165:17:42, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
153:17:08, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
136:16:46, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
321:
64:17:37, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
297:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
150:Walton monarchist89
312:
299:
278:
273:
119:
101:
60:
53:
34:
320:
319:
315:
314:
313:
311:
310:
309:
308:
302:deletion review
295:
276:
271:
92:
76:
73:
62:
58:
51:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
318:
316:
307:
306:
290:
289:
261:
249:
234:
233:
232:
231:
230:
229:
228:
227:
226:
225:
224:
155:
126:
125:
72:
67:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
317:
305:
303:
298:
292:
291:
288:
285:
283:
281:
279:
274:
268:
265:
262:
260:
257:
254:per above. --
253:
250:
248:
245:
244:
238:
235:
223:
220:
216:
215:
214:
211:
207:
206:
205:
202:
197:
192:
191:
190:
187:
182:
181:
180:
177:
172:
168:
167:
166:
163:
159:
156:
154:
151:
147:
143:
140:
139:
138:
137:
134:
130:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
78:Pia Haraldsen
75:
74:
71:
70:Pia Haraldsen
68:
66:
65:
61:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
296:
293:
263:
251:
241:
236:
195:
170:
157:
141:
127:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
256:MaNeMeBasat
142:Weak Delete
158:Weak keep
122:View log
59:(o rly?)
219:grubber
201:grubber
176:grubber
133:grubber
95:protect
90:history
52:Majorly
277:ivind
252:Delete
237:delete
146:WP:BIO
99:delete
46:delete
116:views
108:watch
104:links
16:<
269:. --
264:Keep
171:done
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
243:DGG
210:96T
196:yet
186:96T
162:96T
120:– (
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
48:.
272:E
124:)
118:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.