Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Pictures Of Lily (2011 film) - Knowledge

Source 📝

479:- In the US, this would be classified as an "Independent" film. There are several other films within the Knowledge system that have started off with stubs like this and eventually expanded to be good articles, so I'd say retain. BTW, I've gotten little notices lately that the IMDB is not an indicator of notability, as the information is (like Wikpedia) submitted by the public. Whatever, there's always a delay before IMDB info appears. The editor has been blocked, too, which complicates letting him/her userfy the article. 190:
Article about a "low-budget feature film", originally posted by its makers. Of the two references, Front Row Reviews was written by the assistant producer, and the other is a local paper gossip-column piece about the making of the film in Brighton; there is also a link to a local radio interview with
713:
Has anyone considered unblocking the original author to address some of these issues? It seems a little odd that he/she was blocked, and then a notice placed on his/her talk page about the deletion discussion. Did he/she provide the required statement for use of the wording? Am I correct that he/she
774:
We do have article on Knowledge of independent films, cast with unknowns, that did became notable enough for Knowledge upon release, and I am myself unable with such certainty as you to declare that this one would not. As my crystal ball does not work very well (chuckle), I chose incubation as the
583:
As you suggest, sources to expand the article may or may not become available later. Contacting the author about "incubating" and unblocking him/her is one option. Also, as the film is in production, perhaps we might, according to the guidelines on incomplete films, merge the article with the
670:
article. The section on films is just an overview of films that have been shot there, currently just a sentence long. Including it there would give undue weight to this (currently) non-notable film. The synopsis is verbatim from the official website, so it clearly hasn't been re-written.
728:
The block was a for a user name violation. It won't be unblocked. However, there are instructions in the block notice that indicate how to register a new user name. And to my knowledge, there's nothing stopping the original author from participating using only an IP address. --
191:
the writer/director. No release date is mentioned on the film's website or Facebook page; it does not appear in IMDb. Searches are complicated by the fact that the name is that of a song by The Who, but I have found nothing to suggest that this meets the standard of
326: 389: 263: 159: 651:
The original author says in the comments that he wrote both, and reworded the Knowledge article after being challenged. There is a section in the Brighton article about films shot there, where mention of this film would fit.
530: 756:. There seems to be consensus that subject is not notable right now, and considering that it's an independent picture directed by and starring a bunch of unknowns, it seems unlikely to ever reach 320: 383: 257: 153: 120: 93: 88: 524: 97: 80: 212: 569:- So how would this expand into a good article? What sources would you use? This may become a notable in the future, but right now it doesn't. -- 341: 404: 308: 278: 371: 174: 245: 141: 799:
as lacking significant coverage in multiple independent third party sources. Feel free to ping my talk page if these are added to the page.
637:. No reason to userfy, as only pertinent information is the synopsis which is a copyvio anyway as directly copied from official site. -- 302: 365: 239: 135: 298: 361: 17: 808: 787: 769: 738: 723: 708: 694: 680: 661: 646: 615: 597: 578: 488: 471: 453: 436: 235: 224: 204: 62: 588:
article and redirect from the current article page. If we agree by consensus on that, I'll be happy to handle the revisions.
131: 348: 411: 545: 285: 192: 181: 512: 84: 76: 68: 823: 784: 765: 606:
article. That is an article about a city, this is about a film - simply would not be appropriate to do that. --
433: 314: 36: 377: 822:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
251: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
147: 506: 804: 449: 57: 502: 777: 761: 426: 690: 676: 642: 611: 538: 397: 334: 271: 167: 552: 800: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
48:. Without prejudice to re-creation should the film become notable upon or after its release. 719: 657: 593: 484: 445: 220: 200: 49: 685:
Besides, with a lack of reliable third party sources, there would be nothing to add. --
518: 734: 704: 686: 672: 638: 607: 574: 467: 757: 714:
is unable to participate in the current discussion? Copyright issues are easy to fix.
634: 630: 444:. There's no harm in allowing the editor to userfy this until the film is released. 114: 715: 653: 589: 480: 216: 196: 730: 700: 570: 463: 667: 603: 585: 775:
better option... since returning it to its COI author is problematic.
816:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
699:
I concur that merging to the Brighton article is not viable. --
462:- No evidence of meeting Knowledge's inclusion criteria. - 110: 106: 102: 537: 424:
until this one is released and gets greater coverage.
396: 333: 270: 166: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 826:). No further edits should be made to this page. 602:This should definitely not be merged into the 666:No - it most definitely would not fit in the 551: 410: 347: 284: 180: 8: 211:Note: This debate has been included in the 210: 213:list of Film-related deletion discussions 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 809:22:15, 25 November 2011 (UTC) 788:04:32, 27 November 2011 (UTC) 770:16:55, 23 November 2011 (UTC) 739:19:49, 22 November 2011 (UTC) 724:19:45, 22 November 2011 (UTC) 709:18:31, 22 November 2011 (UTC) 695:16:52, 22 November 2011 (UTC) 681:16:40, 22 November 2011 (UTC) 662:16:13, 22 November 2011 (UTC) 647:10:40, 22 November 2011 (UTC) 616:10:40, 22 November 2011 (UTC) 598:00:10, 22 November 2011 (UTC) 579:19:59, 21 November 2011 (UTC) 489:19:22, 21 November 2011 (UTC) 472:17:53, 21 November 2011 (UTC) 454:04:41, 20 November 2011 (UTC) 437:02:17, 20 November 2011 (UTC) 225:22:19, 19 November 2011 (UTC) 205:22:17, 19 November 2011 (UTC) 63:00:55, 28 November 2011 (UTC) 77:Pictures Of Lily (2011 film) 69:Pictures Of Lily (2011 film) 843: 59:Penny for your thoughts? 819:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 193:WP:Notability (films) 442:Userfy or Incubate 422:Userfy or Incubate 195:. Contested PROD. 44:The result was 760:in the future. -- 227: 834: 821: 780: 556: 555: 541: 429: 415: 414: 400: 352: 351: 337: 289: 288: 274: 185: 184: 170: 118: 100: 60: 54: 34: 842: 841: 837: 836: 835: 833: 832: 831: 830: 824:deletion review 817: 778: 762:Hobbes Goodyear 498: 427: 357: 294: 231: 127: 91: 75: 72: 58: 50: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 840: 838: 829: 828: 812: 811: 793: 792: 791: 790: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 743: 742: 741: 697: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 561: 560: 559: 558: 492: 491: 474: 457: 439: 418: 417: 354: 291: 228: 188: 187: 124: 71: 66: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 839: 827: 825: 820: 814: 813: 810: 806: 802: 798: 795: 794: 789: 786: 785: 782: 781: 773: 772: 771: 767: 763: 759: 755: 752: 740: 736: 732: 727: 726: 725: 721: 717: 712: 711: 710: 706: 702: 698: 696: 692: 688: 684: 683: 682: 678: 674: 669: 665: 664: 663: 659: 655: 650: 649: 648: 644: 640: 636: 633:and probably 632: 628: 625: 617: 613: 609: 605: 601: 600: 599: 595: 591: 587: 582: 581: 580: 576: 572: 568: 565: 564: 563: 562: 554: 550: 547: 544: 540: 536: 532: 529: 526: 523: 520: 517: 514: 511: 508: 504: 501: 500:Find sources: 496: 495: 494: 493: 490: 486: 482: 478: 475: 473: 469: 465: 461: 458: 455: 451: 447: 443: 440: 438: 435: 434: 431: 430: 423: 420: 419: 413: 409: 406: 403: 399: 395: 391: 388: 385: 382: 379: 376: 373: 370: 367: 363: 360: 359:Find sources: 355: 350: 346: 343: 340: 336: 332: 328: 325: 322: 319: 316: 313: 310: 307: 304: 300: 297: 296:Find sources: 292: 287: 283: 280: 277: 273: 269: 265: 262: 259: 256: 253: 250: 247: 244: 241: 237: 234: 233:Find sources: 229: 226: 222: 218: 214: 209: 208: 207: 206: 202: 198: 194: 183: 179: 176: 173: 169: 165: 161: 158: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 133: 130: 129:Find sources: 125: 122: 116: 112: 108: 104: 99: 95: 90: 86: 82: 78: 74: 73: 70: 67: 65: 64: 61: 55: 53: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 818: 815: 801:Stuartyeates 796: 783: 776: 753: 626: 566: 548: 542: 534: 527: 521: 515: 509: 499: 476: 459: 441: 432: 425: 421: 407: 401: 393: 386: 380: 374: 368: 358: 344: 338: 330: 323: 317: 311: 305: 295: 281: 275: 267: 260: 254: 248: 242: 232: 189: 177: 171: 163: 156: 150: 144: 138: 128: 51: 45: 43: 31: 28: 525:free images 456:tokyogirl79 446:Tokyogirl79 384:free images 321:free images 258:free images 154:free images 52:HJ Mitchell 687:Rob Sinden 673:Rob Sinden 639:Rob Sinden 608:Rob Sinden 629:. Fails 779:Schmidt, 668:Brighton 604:Brighton 586:Brighton 428:Schmidt, 121:View log 567:Comment 531:WP refs 519:scholar 390:WP refs 378:scholar 327:WP refs 315:scholar 264:WP refs 252:scholar 160:WP refs 148:scholar 94:protect 89:history 797:Delete 758:WP:GNG 754:Delete 716:Pkeets 654:Pkeets 635:WP:GNG 631:WP:NFF 627:Delete 590:Pkeets 503:Google 481:Pkeets 477:Retain 460:Delete 362:Google 299:Google 236:Google 217:JohnCD 197:JohnCD 132:Google 98:delete 46:delete 546:JSTOR 507:books 405:JSTOR 366:books 342:JSTOR 303:books 279:JSTOR 240:books 175:JSTOR 136:books 115:views 107:watch 103:links 16:< 805:talk 766:talk 735:talk 731:Whpq 720:talk 705:talk 701:Whpq 691:talk 677:talk 658:talk 643:talk 612:talk 594:talk 575:talk 571:Whpq 539:FENS 513:news 485:talk 468:talk 464:Whpq 450:talk 398:FENS 372:news 335:FENS 309:news 272:FENS 246:news 221:talk 201:talk 168:FENS 142:news 111:logs 85:talk 81:edit 553:TWL 412:TWL 349:TWL 286:TWL 182:TWL 119:– ( 807:) 768:) 737:) 722:) 707:) 693:) 679:) 671:-- 660:) 645:) 614:) 596:) 577:) 533:) 487:) 470:) 452:) 392:) 329:) 266:) 223:) 215:. 203:) 162:) 113:| 109:| 105:| 101:| 96:| 92:| 87:| 83:| 56:| 803:( 764:( 733:( 718:( 703:( 689:( 675:( 656:( 641:( 610:( 592:( 573:( 557:) 549:· 543:· 535:· 528:· 522:· 516:· 510:· 505:( 497:( 483:( 466:( 448:( 416:) 408:· 402:· 394:· 387:· 381:· 375:· 369:· 364:( 356:( 353:) 345:· 339:· 331:· 324:· 318:· 312:· 306:· 301:( 293:( 290:) 282:· 276:· 268:· 261:· 255:· 249:· 243:· 238:( 230:( 219:( 199:( 186:) 178:· 172:· 164:· 157:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 134:( 126:( 123:) 117:) 79:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
HJ Mitchell
Penny for your thoughts?
00:55, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Pictures Of Lily (2011 film)
Pictures Of Lily (2011 film)
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:Notability (films)
JohnCD
talk
22:17, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.