258:
The article is obviously one sided and non-encyclopaedic. On the other hand if it were expanded to include references to use, similar phrases used against other religions, rebuttals of accusations against
Muhammad, etc. then I would say keep. I think it is important to show that we are not deleting
323:
the term, as opposed to ones which just happen to use it. In fact, not even any reliable sources which happen to use it - just a blog post, Urban
Dictionary, and a Google search which leads mostly to forums.
300:, and next time don't use an edit summary that says "Look at the refs" when your refs are urbandictionary, a google search, and a blog. (...who walked into a bar, and the bartender said ...) --
121:
196:
True, though I think we should be careful not to give the impression that it is OK to document negative slogans against the US but not against Islam. --
56:, they need to be grounded on reliable and neutral sources about it, and it is more than clear from below discussion that this is not the case here. --
88:
83:
92:
17:
75:
365:
36:
364:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
347:
330:
308:
292:
268:
250:
219:
205:
191:
174:
152:
137:
237:
I wish I could use a speedy delete here, but this might be a better route. I will instead call attention to
79:
246:
215:
187:
162:
71:
63:
52:. While articles on attack phrases can be written in principal and are not necessarily subject to
305:
343:
264:
201:
170:
144:
129:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
49:
242:
211:
183:
316:
277:
238:
179:
165:. There are ten times as many google hits for "piss be upon him" as "axis of medieval"? --
53:
282:
301:
259:
it because it is a taboo subject, but because it is one sided and of low quality. --
148:
133:
57:
339:
260:
197:
166:
109:
326:
210:
While I agree with your point, I do not think this is the forum.
358:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
241:
as I do not see this as capable of becoming more than a dicdef.
182:. We are discussing the merits of this article, not another.
143:
I probably should have just put db-attack on this, actually.
116:
105:
101:
97:
161:
Is there any more reason for this to be deleted than
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
368:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
338:per attack, given lack of notability. --
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
385:
348:13:24, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
331:08:20, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
309:08:18, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
293:08:15, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
269:08:08, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
251:07:55, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
220:08:31, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
206:08:08, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
192:07:58, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
175:07:53, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
153:06:54, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
138:06:53, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
361:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
319:, no reliable sources
128:Non-notable slur.
291:
376:
363:
289:
288:
281:
163:Axis of medieval
119:
113:
95:
72:Piss be upon him
64:Piss be upon him
44:The result was
34:
384:
383:
379:
378:
377:
375:
374:
373:
372:
366:deletion review
359:
286:Esradekan Gibb
284:
283:
115:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
382:
380:
371:
370:
353:
351:
350:
333:
311:
295:
271:
253:
231:
230:
229:
228:
227:
226:
225:
224:
223:
222:
156:
155:
126:
125:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
381:
369:
367:
362:
356:
355:
354:
349:
345:
341:
337:
336:Speedy delete
334:
332:
329:
328:
322:
318:
315:
312:
310:
307:
303:
299:
296:
294:
290:
287:
279:
275:
272:
270:
266:
262:
257:
254:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
235:Strong Delete
233:
232:
221:
217:
213:
209:
208:
207:
203:
199:
195:
194:
193:
189:
185:
181:
178:
177:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
159:
158:
157:
154:
150:
146:
142:
141:
140:
139:
135:
131:
123:
118:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
360:
357:
352:
335:
325:
320:
313:
297:
285:
273:
255:
234:
127:
45:
43:
31:
28:
278:WP:NOT#DICT
256:Weak Delete
243:Mstuczynski
239:wp:not#dict
212:Mstuczynski
184:Mstuczynski
302:Dhartung
122:View log
58:Tikiwont
340:Dweller
261:Q Chris
198:Q Chris
167:Q Chris
89:protect
84:history
54:CSD G10
50:WP:SNOW
327:Iain99
317:WP:NEO
314:Delete
298:Delete
274:Delete
180:WP:WAX
117:delete
93:delete
46:Delete
321:about
120:) – (
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
344:talk
306:Talk
265:talk
247:talk
216:talk
202:talk
188:talk
171:talk
149:talk
134:talk
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
48:per
145:P4k
130:P4k
346:)
304:|
280:.
276:,
267:)
249:)
218:)
204:)
190:)
173:)
151:)
136:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
342:(
263:(
245:(
214:(
200:(
186:(
169:(
147:(
132:(
124:)
114:(
112:)
74:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.