448:
bring together experts to tackle plastic pollution". It contains a quote by an exec, which is followed by an interview. If instead, the journalist attended the event and then wrote up a summary of the talks, then yes, that would be significant coverage. But covering how great the event
280:
This is not a page on an organisation, but rather on an event that is organized internationally twice annually - in
Shanghai and London in 2016 and this year two events in the US. I will link in news about more recent
169:
200:
A promotional page on an unremarkable organisation and its event. The article is cited to the org itself or to otherwise unsuitable sources. Significant RS coverage not found. Created by
221:
261:
241:
163:
318:
122:
298:
416:
444:-- the Dallas News article is not SIGCOV & is part of the pre-event publicity, as can be seen by the headline: "Earth Day Texas event in Dallas
129:
427:. Although Dallas/Plastics News are certainly not as notable as CNN, nothing suggests they should not be treated as unreliable sources either. --
95:
90:
99:
17:
82:
184:
201:
151:
373:
340:
481:
411:
threshold. It is true that
Plasticity Forum hasn't received significant coverage in large news organizations, save for
40:
145:
462:
436:
397:
364:
330:
310:
290:
273:
253:
233:
213:
64:
141:
390:
357:
477:
458:
326:
306:
269:
249:
229:
209:
191:
86:
36:
282:
177:
286:
412:
385:
352:
157:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
476:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
454:
322:
302:
265:
245:
225:
205:
78:
70:
408:
432:
55:
424:
116:
420:
428:
407:. This is borderline for me, but I'd say the topic barely passes the
470:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
376:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
343:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
112:
108:
104:
176:
382:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
349:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
204:with no other contributions outside of this topic.
190:
222:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
484:). No further edits should be made to this page.
262:list of Environment-related deletion discussions
242:list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions
319:list of Business-related deletion discussions
8:
317:Note: This debate has been included in the
297:Note: This debate has been included in the
260:Note: This debate has been included in the
240:Note: This debate has been included in the
220:Note: This debate has been included in the
299:list of Events-related deletion discussions
316:
296:
259:
239:
219:
423:article, and covered numerous times by
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
415:. That said, the forum did receive
24:
202:Special:Contributions/Checa985
1:
501:
473:Please do not modify it.
463:23:34, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
437:14:02, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
413:a trivial mention in CNN
398:06:11, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
365:05:59, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
65:14:14, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
453:be is not significant.
331:06:56, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
311:18:18, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
291:18:11, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
274:01:49, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
254:01:48, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
234:01:48, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
214:01:48, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
417:significant coverage
400:
367:
333:
313:
276:
256:
236:
63:
492:
475:
395:
393:
388:
381:
379:
377:
362:
360:
355:
348:
346:
344:
195:
194:
180:
132:
120:
102:
79:Plasticity Forum
71:Plasticity Forum
62:
60:
53:
34:
500:
499:
495:
494:
493:
491:
490:
489:
488:
482:deletion review
471:
401:
391:
386:
384:
372:
370:
368:
358:
353:
351:
339:
337:
137:
128:
93:
77:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
498:
496:
487:
486:
466:
465:
439:
380:
369:
347:
336:
335:
334:
314:
278:
277:
257:
237:
198:
197:
134:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
497:
485:
483:
479:
474:
468:
467:
464:
460:
456:
452:
447:
443:
442:Nom's comment
440:
438:
434:
430:
426:
425:Plastics News
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
403:
402:
399:
396:
394:
389:
378:
375:
366:
363:
361:
356:
345:
342:
332:
328:
324:
320:
315:
312:
308:
304:
300:
295:
294:
293:
292:
288:
284:
275:
271:
267:
263:
258:
255:
251:
247:
243:
238:
235:
231:
227:
223:
218:
217:
216:
215:
211:
207:
203:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
472:
469:
450:
445:
441:
404:
387:CAPTAIN RAJU
383:
371:
354:CAPTAIN RAJU
350:
338:
279:
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
125:
57:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
455:K.e.coffman
421:Dallas News
323:K.e.coffman
303:K.e.coffman
266:K.e.coffman
246:K.e.coffman
226:K.e.coffman
206:K.e.coffman
164:free images
58:Sandstein
478:talk page
405:Weak Keep
37:talk page
480:or in a
374:Relisted
341:Relisted
283:Checa985
123:View log
39:or in a
281:events.
170:WP refs
158:scholar
96:protect
91:history
142:Google
100:delete
429:Dps04
419:in a
185:JSTOR
146:books
130:Stats
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
459:talk
451:will
446:will
433:talk
327:talk
307:talk
287:talk
270:talk
250:talk
230:talk
210:talk
178:FENS
152:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
409:GNG
392:(✉)
359:(✉)
192:TWL
121:– (
52:.
461:)
435:)
329:)
321:.
309:)
301:.
289:)
272:)
264:.
252:)
244:.
232:)
224:.
212:)
172:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
457:(
431:(
325:(
305:(
285:(
268:(
248:(
228:(
208:(
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
126:·
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.