273:- The article is dealing with a conservation related subject, and probably needs a stub tag (and category) in that direction. At present is does not comply with style requirements, and is thus a weak article, but so are many stubs. Conservation techniques are clearly encyclopaedic, though this article is not one
383:
would get unwieldy if it had sections on preserving instances of this sort (such as stamps, comic books, for instance) - the article is concerned with preserving the information, which may entail copying, or transcribing from one medium to another, something usually frowned on by the issuers of
293:
and clean up to make it a third-person encyclopedia article. Either way, the how-to aspects would make a great contribution to
Wikibooks, and placing links in appropriate Knowledge (XXG) articles would help readers find it.
241:. I don't think we need a how-to manual here, but document preservation is a reasonable topic for coverage. Historical societies, for example, spend a considerable amount of time preserving documents. --
393:
But, ... I just admire the quality of their work ... and imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, .... right? . . . . . . . . . I have adjusted my comment in light of your excellent argument. --
337:
Given that the information is unsourced and the prose is not the best (in fact, my rewrite of the first paragraph may have made it worse), deletion is seems an attractive option. --
328:. The topic of "banknote preservation" is an encyclopedic one that should receive mention somewhere. Other editors can later incorporate it into the main body of the article. --
112:
211:
in saying that if an encyclopedic article on the subject can be written then there is no problem with that, but this is just a how-to. Also agree with the nominator,
306:, empty. Article about technologies and techniques used to conserve paper documents would be important and useful. (They are very diverse and very interesting.)
85:
80:
89:
355:
article unless it becomes evident that it is large or notable enough to require a separate article. Note that similar info on stamps is in a section of
72:
351:. The existing information is minimal (and unsourced) and should be (merged, if you wish) in a "Preservation" section of the relevant
289:
as Elkman suggested to make a stronger article. But if as a result of addition of further material it becomes too much to merge, just
253:
unless article changes to reflect culture of money preservation or other encyclopedic content, then move to a more appropriate title.
17:
379:
a good merge target, as banknotes are not primarily information-carrying "media" so much as artifacts of value in themselves.
397:
388:
341:
332:
310:
298:
281:
264:
245:
225:
195:
181:
167:
145:
132:
54:
414:
36:
76:
215:
157:
413:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
68:
60:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
238:
368:
221:
is not a valid reason to keep an article, particularly when what's being constructed is unencyclopedic.
307:
363:), with one of the tools described there being notable enough to have a small article of its own (
380:
372:
323:
278:
234:
49:
394:
338:
329:
208:
142:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
356:
164:
258:
204:
163:
template), and the last edit to this article is only 6 days prior to this nomination. -
141:: per nom, although without prejudice to an encyclopaedic article being written later.
261:
192:
177:
128:
153:- the article author has clearly marked the article as under construction (with the
106:
172:
And? The fact that it's new doesn't mean that it is encyclopedic or will be. --
385:
364:
242:
222:
352:
319:
295:
173:
124:
360:
407:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
102:
98:
94:
48:
as a how-to guide, no verified information to merge.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
417:). No further edits should be made to this page.
257:How to type pages are clearly discussed under
8:
320:Banknote#Paper money collecting as a hobby
119:Knowledge (XXG) is not a how-to manual.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
237:, making sure that everything is
239:attributed to a reliable source
1:
367:), as opposed to a separate
434:
398:00:24, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
389:22:19, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
342:00:24, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
333:21:52, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
311:23:11, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
299:00:52, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
282:23:41, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
265:17:57, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
246:16:50, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
226:15:46, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
196:09:53, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
182:09:21, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
168:08:56, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
146:07:22, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
133:05:27, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
55:10:33, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
191:inappropriate content. /
69:Preservation of banknotes
61:Preservation of banknotes
410:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
369:Preservation of stamps
359:(itself summarized in
326:as a separate section
381:Media preservation
373:Media preservation
324:Media preservation
235:Media preservation
216:underconstruction
209:User:David.Mestel
158:underconstruction
53:
425:
412:
357:Stamp collecting
220:
214:
207:. I agree with
162:
156:
110:
92:
52:
34:
433:
432:
428:
427:
426:
424:
423:
422:
421:
415:deletion review
408:
308:Pavel Vozenilek
218:
212:
160:
154:
83:
67:
64:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
431:
429:
420:
419:
403:
402:
401:
400:
384:banknotes! -
346:
345:
344:
313:
301:
284:
255:
254:
248:
228:
198:
186:
185:
184:
148:
117:
116:
63:
58:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
430:
418:
416:
411:
405:
404:
399:
396:
392:
391:
390:
387:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
347:
343:
340:
336:
335:
334:
331:
327:
325:
321:
317:
314:
312:
309:
305:
302:
300:
297:
292:
288:
285:
283:
280:
279:Peterkingiron
276:
272:
269:
268:
267:
266:
263:
260:
252:
249:
247:
244:
240:
236:
232:
229:
227:
224:
217:
210:
206:
202:
199:
197:
194:
190:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
170:
169:
166:
159:
152:
149:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:
135:
134:
130:
126:
122:
114:
108:
104:
100:
96:
91:
87:
82:
78:
74:
70:
66:
65:
62:
59:
57:
56:
51:
50:Seraphimblade
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
409:
406:
395:Black Falcon
386:David Oberst
376:
348:
339:Black Falcon
330:Black Falcon
322:
315:
303:
290:
286:
274:
270:
256:
250:
230:
200:
188:
150:
143:David Mestel
138:
120:
118:
45:
43:
31:
28:
365:stamp hinge
165:NDCompuGeek
371:article.
316:Weak Merge
262:i kan reed
271:Weak Keep
353:banknote
193:Blaxthos
113:View log
86:protect
81:history
361:Stamps
349:Delete
304:Delete
259:WP:NOT
251:Delete
243:Elkman
223:Arkyan
205:WP:NOT
201:Delete
189:delete
139:Delete
121:Delete
90:delete
46:delete
318:into
287:Merge
231:Merge
107:views
99:watch
95:links
16:<
291:keep
277:.
203:per
178:talk
151:KEEP
129:talk
123:. --
103:logs
77:talk
73:edit
377:not
375:is
296:Fg2
275:yet
233:to
174:Nlu
125:Nlu
111:– (
219:}}
213:{{
180:)
161:}}
155:{{
131:)
105:|
101:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
79:|
75:|
176:(
127:(
115:)
109:)
71:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.