Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Princess Maria of Romania - Knowledge

Source 📝

506:, nothing to merge here, article had virtually no meaningful sourced content anyway. Obviously non-notable (the only thing that's sourced about her is that "Order" she got recently, which isn't a "national honour" as the article presented it, but a private family-internal matter. Article says nothing about her having ever done anything in particular, let alone anything that would make her notable. Biographic trivia content was entirely unsourced. 285:). As HRH Jimbo, Prince of Wales, has stated, "There is usefulness in having a compete set of entries on hereditary peers, even if some peers are less prominent or noteworthy than others, even when the article must of necessity remain something of a stub. Considering these articles in isolation, i.e. not noting that they are part of a wider series, is mistaken...." (see 677:
with the sources now cited in the article, which amount to a passing mention in a local American newspaper and nothing else recognizable as a reliable source. Inherent notability as an office-holder is out of the question, because the office attributed to her does not exist, given that Romania is no
655:
Many of the pages here on historical nobility and royalty include a Family or Marriages and Children section which is used to comprehensively list the children of the noble or royal individual. Those who are notable in their own right get their pages linked there, others are just a name in a list.
521:
I am not strongly opposed to this being reduced to a redirect to her father, ex-king Michael of Romania. However in the previous cases listed by Bearia I think there was a fairly consistent outcome, we do treat princesses etc. in actually reigning royal families as notable, but supposed princesses
522:
in deposed royal families are not notable. The Hohenzollern Princess Maria mentioned was a slightly contentious borderline case, but with her the articles defenders were arguing that there were some factors which made her slightly more notable than most deposed monarchy cruft.
214:
This person is not and never has been a real princess, as she was born after Romania became a republic. The article content is mostly trivia. The general precedent is that we do not treat alleged princesses in deposed royal families as inherently notable, see
286: 246: 293:, not disposed monarchs, but I think an analogy is appropriate. I am not advocating keeping such stubs, however. A merger is a nice compromise in the cases of hereditary ("fake") princelings; this AfD would make an excellent 356:. Also, there is more here than a few dozen articles of doubtful notability, there is a degree of monarchist bias by treating members of deposed royal families as having the same notability as if they had not been deposed. 180: 463: 216: 265:. A deletion would remove blue links and some information valuable to our readership. Keeping such trivia clutters our files and risks BLP violations and fights of competing pretenders and 220: 174: 380: 133: 443: 656:
I see no reason why this should be any different. The limited data about this individual that I see on the page could easily be included in her parent's page.
483: 398:
Firstly everyone is a real princess (or prince - or frog), that is a given. Secondly there appears to be Knowledge notability. Thirdly there is the option to
106: 101: 272: 245:
are not easy to categorize, and I am grateful that this nomination will give the community a chance to discuss the matter more fully. About five years ago,
110: 336:
I'm not sure what "Clutters our files" means here. (We have over 660,000 BLPs so a few dozen for deposed royals won't make much difference.) All the best:
140: 93: 570:
Please, especially if you vote keep, provide an extensive argumentation. So far there are more keep votes but the delete argumentation is stronger.--
69: 642: 510: 195: 162: 638:... as per which pieces of significant, detailed and non-trivial biographical coverage, in which multiple reliable sources exactly? 17: 639: 507: 97: 156: 690: 665: 645: 633: 595: 579: 548: 531: 513: 495: 475: 455: 434: 390: 365: 331: 310: 232: 75: 152: 709: 407: 341: 202: 89: 81: 40: 64: 258: 527: 422: 361: 276: 228: 705: 36: 168: 425:: her only claim to notability appears to be that she's the youngest daughter of a deposed monarch. -- 404: 338: 51: 624: 591: 575: 188: 59: 56: 661: 430: 242: 544: 523: 491: 471: 451: 357: 327: 306: 280: 224: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
704:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
558: 353: 681: 608: 587: 571: 674: 657: 426: 290: 287:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Alexander Gordon, 7th Marquess of Aberdeen and Temair
254: 250: 247:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Princess Maria Adelgunde of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen
540: 487: 467: 447: 323: 302: 262: 127: 383: 539:, I see the arguments for deleting, but I think there is level of notability.-- 352:
That is a classic example of an argument to avoid in deletion discussions, see
379:, I think this person might have received some coverage from reliable sources 561:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
294: 266: 253:
to merge such articles to their parent's article, whomever is the
698:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
464:
list of United States of America-related deletion discussions
217:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Chantal, Princess of Hanover
221:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Monika Princess of Hanover
319: 123: 119: 115: 187: 241:- actually, as I posted on the nominator's page, the 211:
Not notable, deposed monarchy cruft, contested prod.
586:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 712:). No further edits should be made to this page. 201: 8: 482:Note: This debate has been included in the 462:Note: This debate has been included in the 444:list of Romania-related deletion discussions 442:Note: This debate has been included in the 55:. No real notability apart from her father. 484:list of People-related deletion discussions 481: 461: 441: 249:ended in "no consensus". I'd like to get 7: 402:to a sensible target. All the best: 289:). Jimbo was referring to peers of 283:, is fifth in line to the throne!!! 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 673:There's no chance at passing 297:, every lawyer's dream of an 279:and her cousin Prince Oscar, 275:is the fourth in line to the 243:past outcomes for these cases 320:Jimbo speaketh in agreement 261:who is most recongnized by 729: 396:Keep - rename if necessary 413:21:44, 13 May 2014 (UTC). 347:23:08, 15 May 2014 (UTC). 90:Princess Maria of Romania 82:Princess Maria of Romania 701:Please do not modify it. 691:19:06, 30 May 2014 (UTC) 666:20:58, 21 May 2014 (UTC) 646:08:35, 21 May 2014 (UTC) 634:22:45, 20 May 2014 (UTC) 596:07:01, 20 May 2014 (UTC) 580:07:01, 20 May 2014 (UTC) 549:09:16, 15 May 2014 (UTC) 532:17:01, 14 May 2014 (UTC) 514:13:15, 14 May 2014 (UTC) 496:03:16, 14 May 2014 (UTC) 476:03:16, 14 May 2014 (UTC) 456:03:16, 14 May 2014 (UTC) 435:01:29, 14 May 2014 (UTC) 391:20:44, 13 May 2014 (UTC) 366:22:38, 20 May 2014 (UTC) 332:16:16, 13 May 2014 (UTC) 311:13:15, 13 May 2014 (UTC) 233:21:22, 12 May 2014 (UTC) 76:03:41, 31 May 2014 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 259:pretender to the throne 277:Duchy of Grand Fenwick 271:No, Princess Lucinda, 52:Michael I of Romania 678:longer a monarchy. 568:Relisting comment: 48:The result was 689: 598: 498: 478: 458: 414: 348: 281:Duke of Oldenburg 273:Countess of Rhedy 720: 703: 688: 686: 679: 631: 622: 615: 585: 563: 412: 388: 346: 263:reliable sources 206: 205: 191: 143: 131: 113: 72: 67: 62: 34: 728: 727: 723: 722: 721: 719: 718: 717: 716: 710:deletion review 699: 682: 680: 625: 616: 609: 607:as passes GNG. 556: 423:WP:NOTINHERITED 384: 251:a new consensus 148: 139: 104: 88: 85: 70: 65: 60: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 726: 724: 715: 714: 694: 693: 668: 650: 649: 648: 601: 600: 599: 583: 582: 565: 564: 553: 552: 551: 534: 516: 500: 499: 479: 459: 438: 437: 416: 415: 393: 373: 372: 371: 370: 369: 368: 349: 334: 314: 313: 209: 208: 145: 84: 79: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 725: 713: 711: 707: 702: 696: 695: 692: 687: 685: 676: 672: 669: 667: 663: 659: 654: 651: 647: 644: 641: 637: 636: 635: 632: 630: 629: 628:→Talk to me!→ 623: 621: 620: 614: 613: 606: 603: 602: 597: 593: 589: 584: 581: 577: 573: 569: 566: 562: 560: 555: 554: 550: 546: 542: 538: 535: 533: 529: 525: 520: 517: 515: 512: 509: 505: 502: 501: 497: 493: 489: 485: 480: 477: 473: 469: 465: 460: 457: 453: 449: 445: 440: 439: 436: 432: 428: 424: 420: 417: 410: 409: 406: 401: 397: 394: 392: 389: 387: 381: 378: 375: 374: 367: 363: 359: 355: 351: 350: 344: 343: 340: 335: 333: 329: 325: 321: 318: 317: 316: 315: 312: 308: 304: 300: 296: 292: 291:Great Britain 288: 284: 282: 278: 274: 268: 264: 260: 256: 255:heir apparent 252: 248: 244: 240: 237: 236: 235: 234: 230: 226: 222: 218: 212: 204: 200: 197: 194: 190: 186: 182: 179: 176: 173: 170: 167: 164: 161: 158: 154: 151: 150:Find sources: 146: 142: 138: 135: 129: 125: 121: 117: 112: 108: 103: 99: 95: 91: 87: 86: 83: 80: 78: 77: 73: 68: 63: 58: 54: 53: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 700: 697: 683: 670: 652: 627: 626: 618: 617: 611: 610: 604: 567: 557: 536: 524:PatGallacher 518: 503: 418: 403: 399: 395: 385: 376: 358:PatGallacher 337: 301:, so to do. 298: 270: 238: 225:PatGallacher 213: 210: 198: 192: 184: 177: 171: 165: 159: 149: 136: 50:redirect to 49: 47: 31: 28: 257:or the one 175:free images 684:Sandstein 408:Farmbrough 342:Farmbrough 267:favourites 706:talk page 640:Fut.Perf. 588:Ymblanter 572:Ymblanter 508:Fut.Perf. 488:• Gene93k 468:• Gene93k 448:• Gene93k 377:Weak keep 354:WP:NOHARM 299:easy case 295:precedent 37:talk page 708:or in a 658:1bandsaw 559:Relisted 541:Codrin.B 427:Carnildo 134:View log 39:or in a 671:Delete. 324:Bearian 303:Bearian 181:WP refs 169:scholar 107:protect 102:history 57:King of 675:WP:BIO 612:→Davey 504:Delete 386:Valoem 153:Google 111:delete 653:Merge 619:2010→ 519:Reply 419:Merge 400:merge 239:Merge 196:JSTOR 157:books 141:Stats 128:views 120:watch 116:links 16:< 662:talk 605:Keep 592:talk 576:talk 545:talk 537:Keep 528:talk 492:talk 472:talk 452:talk 431:talk 421:per 405:Rich 362:talk 339:Rich 328:talk 307:talk 229:talk 219:and 189:FENS 163:news 124:logs 98:talk 94:edit 203:TWL 132:– ( 664:) 594:) 578:) 547:) 530:) 494:) 486:. 474:) 466:. 454:) 446:. 433:) 411:, 382:. 364:) 345:, 330:) 322:. 309:) 231:) 223:. 183:) 126:| 122:| 118:| 114:| 109:| 105:| 100:| 96:| 74:♠ 660:( 643:☼ 590:( 574:( 543:( 526:( 511:☼ 490:( 470:( 450:( 429:( 360:( 326:( 305:( 269:( 227:( 207:) 199:· 193:· 185:· 178:· 172:· 166:· 160:· 155:( 147:( 144:) 137:· 130:) 92:( 71:♣ 66:♦ 61:♥

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Michael I of Romania
King of



03:41, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Princess Maria of Romania
Princess Maria of Romania
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.