109:(Note that they could be viewed as a competitor of my employer, I'd comment instead of voting delete, but I don't think that bias should count against a keep vote.) While the initial references to their notability in the last AfD were at the company's web site, the cited sources in the article are press articles. (The company site versions are not press releases, they are images of the cited articles.) At least the second appears to me to include research the company would not likely have included in its press releases. The first does look like a repackaged press release. As I said last AfD round in a comment, it appears to pass
122:
Later comment. I've tried more research. I'm not sure this can get beyond being a short stub other than by being built on the Arabic wikipedia and then translated to here. There just aren't many
English language references to them, and most of those aren't good enough sources - either reprints of
123:
press releases or one line directory entries. It looks like most of their product releases are, or at least were 10 years ago, to make available in Arabic language versions of software widely available in
English language versions. Changing my vote to a weak keep.
68:
This page was restored by DRV after community consensus determined that it was prematurely deleted while revising was in progress. DRV recommended relisting for further consensus, so here we are. This is a procedural nomination, so I
165:
I don't see evidence of notability, even for criterion WP:CORP 1--coverage by the non-notable press doesn't create notability. Show me a Wall Street
Journal article, I'll change my mind.--
91:
87:
137:- Its notability is posited on screen captures hosted on its own website (look at the two references URL's). Unbelievable self-promotion.
17:
151:
No, as per my post above, its notability is posited and referenced to the originals that the company took screen captures of.
205:
188:
183:
169:
155:
143:
127:
117:
101:
77:
56:
220:
36:
219:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
178:
140:
51:
200:
62:
166:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
110:
48:
197:
90:, as this content resided at a different capitalization at the time. The previous AfD
152:
124:
114:
98:
74:
94:
is not relevant to this discussion. For the DRV discussion, see
213:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
95:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
92:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/ProgressSoft
88:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Progressoft
223:). No further edits should be made to this page.
86::The applicable previous deletion discussion is
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
44:The result of the debate was
240:
216:Please do not modify it.
206:07:22, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
196:. I agree with GRBerry.
189:13:17, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
170:12:00, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
156:01:36, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
144:01:32, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
128:13:10, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
118:01:15, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
102:16:31, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
78:16:23, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
57:20:37, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
203:
187:
146:
231:
218:
201:
181:
138:
54:
34:
239:
238:
234:
233:
232:
230:
229:
228:
227:
221:deletion review
214:
177:per GRBerry. --
66:
52:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
237:
235:
226:
225:
209:
208:
191:
179:badlydrawnjeff
172:
159:
158:
148:
147:
132:
131:
130:
104:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
236:
224:
222:
217:
211:
210:
207:
204:
199:
195:
192:
190:
185:
180:
176:
173:
171:
168:
164:
161:
160:
157:
154:
150:
149:
145:
142:
141:204.42.22.114
136:
133:
129:
126:
121:
120:
119:
116:
112:
108:
105:
103:
100:
97:
93:
89:
85:
82:
81:
80:
79:
76:
72:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
50:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
215:
212:
193:
174:
162:
134:
106:
83:
70:
67:
63:ProgressSoft
45:
43:
31:
28:
163:Weak delete
49:Computerjoe
113:point 1.
198:Sjakkalle
184:WP:MEMES?
107:Weak Keep
202:(Check!)
153:GRBerry
125:GRBerry
115:GRBerry
111:WP:CORP
71:abstain
53:'s talk
167:FRCP11
135:Delete
99:Xoloz
75:Xoloz
16:<
194:Keep
175:Keep
96:here
46:Keep
84:NB
73:.
186:)
182:(
139:—
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.