231:
shows that the term is used to describe someone different from the run of the mill savant. Please check the Book and
Scholar results especially. One says, "The term prodigious savant is reserved for those very rare persons in an already uncommon condition where the special skill or ability is so
204:
232:
outstanding that...". Another says, "The prodigious savant represents a very high threshold group and there are probably less than 100 such known persons living worldwide at the present time." Currently the
198:
135:
236:
article is small enough to accommodate this article, and the average user actually expects this definition when they look up "savant". (As did the nominator.) So
265:. It does introduce a bit of new information here and there, but I don't think it's sufficiently distinguished to warrant a separate article. -
102:
97:
106:
142:
I can't see any difference between this definition and that of a "savant". The PROD was deleted by the user, so i've moved it to XfD.
89:
219:
17:
186:
180:
335:
36:
334:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
317:
297:
274:
253:
249:
162:
71:
59:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
176:
313:
93:
226:
245:
212:
154:
64:
54:
309:
270:
192:
85:
77:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
262:
47:
143:
266:
290:
123:
284:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
233:
308:
seems the most sensible course. It is, at most, a kind of savant.
328:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
130:
119:
115:
111:
211:
289:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
338:). No further edits should be made to this page.
225:
8:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
72:20:58, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
318:15:47, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
298:23:29, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
275:03:09, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
254:05:05, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
163:04:25, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
355:
331:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
244:but do not delete.
44:The result was
300:
86:Prodigious Savant
78:Prodigious Savant
346:
333:
295:
288:
286:
230:
229:
215:
133:
127:
109:
67:
62:
57:
34:
354:
353:
349:
348:
347:
345:
344:
343:
342:
336:deletion review
329:
291:
282:
263:Savant syndrome
172:
129:
100:
84:
81:
65:
60:
55:
48:Savant syndrome
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
352:
350:
341:
340:
323:
321:
320:
302:
301:
287:
279:
278:
277:
256:
246:Phlegm Rooster
140:
139:
80:
75:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
351:
339:
337:
332:
326:
325:
324:
319:
315:
311:
307:
304:
303:
299:
296:
294:
285:
281:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
257:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
228:
224:
221:
218:
214:
210:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
178:
175:
174:Find sources:
170:
167:
166:
165:
164:
161:
160:
157:
153:
152:
149:
146:
137:
132:
125:
121:
117:
113:
108:
104:
99:
95:
91:
87:
83:
82:
79:
76:
74:
73:
70:
69:
68:
63:
58:
50:
49:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
330:
327:
322:
305:
292:
283:
258:
241:
237:
222:
216:
208:
201:
195:
189:
183:
173:
168:
158:
155:
150:
147:
144:
141:
56:bibliomaniac
53:
52:
45:
43:
31:
28:
199:free images
46:merge with
267:Vianello
136:View log
293:JForget
205:WP refs
193:scholar
169:Comment
103:protect
98:history
310:maxsch
234:Savant
177:Google
131:delete
107:delete
306:Merge
261:with
259:Merge
238:Merge
220:JSTOR
181:books
134:) – (
124:views
116:watch
112:links
16:<
314:talk
271:talk
250:talk
242:Keep
213:FENS
187:news
120:logs
94:talk
90:edit
240:or
227:TWL
316:)
273:)
252:)
207:)
171:.
156:ld
151:ho
148:on
145:Ir
122:|
118:|
114:|
110:|
105:|
101:|
96:|
92:|
51:.
312:(
269:(
248:(
223:·
217:·
209:·
202:·
196:·
190:·
184:·
179:(
159:s
138:)
128:(
126:)
88:(
66:5
61:1
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.