Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Professional open source (2nd nomination) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

215:
article Violates NPOV and is advocacy of open source which proselytizing, evangelism, ministry etc is prohibited in another words wikipedia is not an advocacy website, wikipedia is also not a place to promote the various companies that are in this article, another objection to this article is original research which according to wikipedia policy does not belong on wikipedia and also this article is unnecessary considering we have the Business models for open-source software which has none of the problems i have listed for Professional open source
279:
as a school project in two weeks of October 2014. I hope Knowledge (XXG) has learned that school projects that focus on creating new articles are counter-productive. They almost always produce one-sided articles filled with direct promotional quotes that are at best a snapshot in time. Then veteran
214:
this article is clearly advertising on the article i have read the entire article and to comply with all of the demands i would have to remove entire sections of the article as it has clear bias from my point of view even though wikipedia entirely relies on FLOSS thus meeting FSF criteria this
82: 183: 77: 136: 177: 143: 252: 232: 109: 104: 113: 96: 289: 264: 244: 224: 61: 198: 165: 17: 276: 159: 308: 40: 260: 240: 155: 100: 205: 92: 67: 256: 236: 304: 220: 36: 171: 285: 191: 275:
Not as bad as some, but it looks like the material comes almost all from a single-purpose account
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
303:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
216: 57: 281: 130: 53: 280:
editors spend their time finding those articles and deleting them. /rant
297:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
83:
Articles for deletion/Professional open source (2nd nomination)
126: 122: 118: 190: 204: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 311:). No further edits should be made to this page. 78:Articles for deletion/Professional open source 253:list of Software-related deletion discussions 233:list of Business-related deletion discussions 8: 251:Note: This debate has been included in the 231:Note: This debate has been included in the 250: 230: 75: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 74: 24: 1: 290:17:38, 17 February 2017 (UTC) 265:15:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC) 245:15:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC) 225:04:28, 16 February 2017 (UTC) 62:21:14, 25 February 2017 (UTC) 328: 300:Please do not modify it. 93:Professional open source 68:Professional open source 32:Please do not modify it. 73:AfDs for this article: 267: 257:Shawn in Montreal 247: 237:Shawn in Montreal 319: 302: 209: 208: 194: 146: 134: 116: 34: 327: 326: 322: 321: 320: 318: 317: 316: 315: 309:deletion review 298: 151: 142: 107: 91: 88: 71: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 325: 323: 314: 313: 293: 292: 269: 268: 248: 212: 211: 148: 87: 86: 85: 80: 72: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 324: 312: 310: 306: 301: 295: 294: 291: 287: 283: 278: 274: 271: 270: 266: 262: 258: 254: 249: 246: 242: 238: 234: 229: 228: 227: 226: 222: 218: 207: 203: 200: 197: 193: 189: 185: 182: 179: 176: 173: 170: 167: 164: 161: 157: 154: 153:Find sources: 149: 145: 141: 138: 132: 128: 124: 120: 115: 111: 106: 102: 98: 94: 90: 89: 84: 81: 79: 76: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 299: 296: 272: 213: 201: 195: 187: 180: 174: 168: 162: 152: 139: 49: 47: 31: 28: 277:ArunPatel95 217:Jonnymoon96 178:free images 305:talk page 282:W Nowicki 37:talk page 307:or in a 137:View log 39:or in a 184:WP refs 172:scholar 110:protect 105:history 273:Delete 156:Google 114:delete 54:Kurykh 50:delete 199:JSTOR 160:books 144:Stats 131:views 123:watch 119:links 16:< 286:talk 261:talk 241:talk 221:talk 192:FENS 166:news 127:logs 101:talk 97:edit 58:talk 206:TWL 135:– ( 52:. 288:) 263:) 255:. 243:) 235:. 223:) 186:) 129:| 125:| 121:| 117:| 112:| 108:| 103:| 99:| 60:) 284:( 259:( 239:( 219:( 210:) 202:· 196:· 188:· 181:· 175:· 169:· 163:· 158:( 150:( 147:) 140:· 133:) 95:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Kurykh
talk
21:14, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Professional open source
Articles for deletion/Professional open source
Articles for deletion/Professional open source (2nd nomination)
Professional open source
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.