815:
material would leave a stub or sub-stub. One remedy would be to change the guidelines to state that films are notable when they are in principal photography, even without any coverage, but that would just encourage promotional use. Another remedy would be to apply the guideline as written. Another approach would be to ignore the disconnect, which is what we do. I am willing to change my !vote to
814:
itself has been notable. As applied, films are considered notable, at least by some editors including AFD !voters, if principal photography has begun. This has the side effect of encouraging the creation of promotional articles on films in principal photography, although removing the promotional
513:
670:
notes, accusations of promotional bias are not appropriate here, if you feel that is problem then the talk page on the article is the place to address it. The talk page is currently empty, why not start a discussion there instead of here where it is not
507:
199:. Unreleased films are only notable if the production itself is notable, and there is no mention of independent coverage of the production. In the absence of coverage of the production, this article can be viewed as
164:
840:, if there is no encyclopedic content (which this article comes very close to being, in its current incarnation it is little more than a listing). Articles get speedied all the time for advertising, as per
528:
117:
495:
489:
158:
220:
485:
535:
258:
Comment - this film has not been released yet, but very soon will be. Would it not be sensible to have an article on this film after the film has been released?
239:
754:
628:, not deletion. As for "condescending", if one realizes CBALL is inapplicable or inappropriate, why not strike that error if leaving it could mislead?
501:
124:
810:
and the way that the guidelines are applied. As written, unreleased films, and this one was unreleased when it was nominated, are only notable if
90:
85:
341:
as it seems to be getting more coverage now it has been released. It needs a reception section referencing reviews from reliable sources.
358:-- an apparently nn film; I could not find any reviews, just pre-release publicity. Article is 100% promo content which is excluded per
275:- Only if the film is released on schedule, and if the article is updated to include film reviews and similar independent information.
94:
52:. Numerically, the keep and delete camps are about even, but once the film was released, opinion was clearly running towards keep. --
17:
77:
742:
566:
he might have understood the film has screened and received poor review. Again, wow. Even a hated bad film can meet standards.
179:
146:
594:
there's no need to be condescending. Furthermore, even if this is the case, the promotional aspect is still unaddressed.
455:
If the film turns out to be notable, recreate it. At the moment it serves only to promote the film before its release.
411:
380:
316:
907:
40:
844:. That being said, this article has been cut down so as to remove any promotion/advertising, and since it now passes
564:
293:
140:
824:
795:
637:
575:
280:
208:
748:
888:
863:
828:
798:
714:
680:
640:
612:
578:
473:
452:
429:
402:
371:
350:
331:
307:
284:
267:
250:
231:
212:
59:
136:
425:
903:
811:
367:
346:
327:
186:
81:
36:
872:
820:
788:
771:
665:
630:
589:
568:
303:
276:
204:
553:
359:
707:
605:
521:
466:
172:
731:
625:
676:
421:
56:
845:
807:
693:
444:
440:
200:
196:
244:
225:
152:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
902:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
837:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
884:
363:
342:
263:
73:
65:
841:
775:
299:
783:
735:
549:
699:
657:
619:
597:
557:
458:
396:
853:
687:
672:
53:
111:
880:
259:
875:
who also reminds us that we don't delete just because it's terrible. Otherwise
836:- actually promotion and/or advertising is a valid reason for deletion as per
391:
761:
692:
the promotionalism wasn't the main reason for deletion, the failure of
767:
548:
this (finally) released and screened and reviewed film per meeting
741:
covers the film's release in a more-than-trivial manner, as does
896:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
782:
been subsequently released and has requisite coverage to meet
414:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
383:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
319:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
107:
103:
99:
520:
171:
534:
420:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
389:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
325:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
185:
560:is inapplicable. Wow. Had he read the article in
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
910:). No further edits should be made to this page.
778:met before this nomination was made, the film
221:list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions
8:
238:Note: This debate has been included in the
219:Note: This debate has been included in the
806:- There is a disconnect between the stated
774:and others to reconsider that not only was
237:
218:
240:list of Film-related deletion discussions
760:speak towards production plans, as does
626:tagging for tone or other editorial work
448:
819:. I won't change my !vote to Keep.
453:Knowledge (XXG) isn't a crystal ball.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
451:!vote isn't valid by policy because
696:was. That was just a side-point.
24:
879:wouldn't get an article either.
889:20:57, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
864:20:39, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
829:03:54, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
799:01:18, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
768:"Project+Peshawar"&tbm=nws
715:08:50, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
681:08:24, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
641:10:56, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
613:10:14, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
579:09:56, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
474:14:09, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
430:06:06, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
60:22:19, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
1:
403:18:04, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
372:02:29, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
871:per the sources provided by
624:Which would be a matter for
351:15:20, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
332:02:31, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
308:22:55, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
285:22:59, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
268:09:31, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
251:04:57, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
232:04:57, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
213:01:45, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
927:
808:film notability guidelines
730:for early delete voters":
197:film notability guidelines
848:, I see no reason not to
445:film notability standards
899:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
750:The News International
812:principal photography
873:User:MichaelQSchmidt
552:. The accusation of
732:Diligent searches
432:
405:
334:
253:
234:
918:
901:
860:
857:
791:
737:Express Tribune
712:
710:
705:
702:
691:
669:
661:
633:
623:
610:
608:
603:
600:
593:
571:
539:
538:
524:
471:
469:
464:
461:
419:
417:
415:
394:
388:
386:
384:
330:
324:
322:
320:
249:
230:
190:
189:
175:
127:
115:
97:
74:Project Peshawar
66:Project Peshawar
34:
926:
925:
921:
920:
919:
917:
916:
915:
914:
908:deletion review
897:
858:
855:
821:Robert McClenon
789:
756:Express Tribune
744:Pakistani Today
708:
703:
700:
698:
685:
666:MichaelQSchmidt
663:
655:
631:
617:
606:
601:
598:
596:
590:MichaelQSchmidt
587:
569:
481:
467:
462:
459:
457:
433:
410:
408:
406:
392:
379:
377:
335:
326:
315:
313:
277:Robert McClenon
243:
224:
205:Robert McClenon
132:
123:
88:
72:
69:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
924:
922:
913:
912:
892:
891:
866:
831:
801:
786:. Thank you.
724:
723:
722:
721:
720:
719:
718:
717:
648:
647:
646:
645:
644:
643:
582:
581:
542:
541:
477:
476:
418:
407:
387:
376:
375:
374:
353:
323:
312:
311:
310:
287:
270:
255:
254:
235:
193:
192:
129:
68:
63:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
923:
911:
909:
905:
900:
894:
893:
890:
886:
882:
878:
874:
870:
867:
865:
862:
861:
851:
847:
843:
839:
835:
832:
830:
826:
822:
818:
813:
809:
805:
802:
800:
797:
796:
793:
792:
785:
781:
777:
773:
772:the nominator
769:
766:, and others.
765:
764:
759:
757:
752:
751:
746:
745:
740:
738:
733:
729:
726:
725:
716:
713:
711:
706:
695:
689:
684:
683:
682:
678:
674:
667:
659:
654:
653:
652:
651:
650:
649:
642:
639:
638:
635:
634:
627:
621:
616:
615:
614:
611:
609:
604:
591:
586:
585:
584:
583:
580:
577:
576:
573:
572:
565:
563:
559:
555:
551:
547:
544:
543:
537:
533:
530:
527:
523:
519:
515:
512:
509:
506:
503:
500:
497:
494:
491:
487:
484:
483:Find sources:
479:
478:
475:
472:
470:
465:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
435:
434:
431:
427:
423:
422:TheSandDoctor
416:
413:
404:
401:
400:
399:
395:
385:
382:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
354:
352:
348:
344:
340:
337:
336:
333:
329:
328:North America
321:
318:
309:
305:
301:
297:
296:
291:
288:
286:
282:
278:
274:
271:
269:
265:
261:
257:
256:
252:
248:
247:
241:
236:
233:
229:
228:
222:
217:
216:
215:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
188:
184:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:Find sources:
130:
126:
122:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
898:
895:
876:
868:
854:
849:
833:
816:
803:
794:
787:
779:
762:
755:
749:
743:
736:
727:
697:
636:
629:
595:
574:
567:
561:
545:
531:
525:
517:
510:
504:
498:
492:
482:
456:
439:: extremely
436:
409:
397:
390:
378:
355:
338:
314:
294:
289:
272:
246:CAPTAIN RAJU
245:
227:CAPTAIN RAJU
226:
194:
182:
176:
168:
161:
155:
149:
143:
133:
120:
49:
47:
31:
28:
508:free images
441:promotional
364:K.e.coffman
343:Atlantic306
201:promotional
159:free images
554:WP:CRYSTAL
443:and fails
360:WP:NOTSPAM
300:Mfarazbaig
904:talk page
790:Schmidt,
671:relevant?
658:DrStrauss
632:Schmidt,
620:DrStrauss
570:Schmidt,
558:DrStrauss
339:Weak keep
37:talk page
906:or in a
846:WP:NFILM
770:. I ask
694:WP:NFILM
688:Egaoblai
673:Egaoblai
562:The News
412:Relisted
381:Relisted
317:Relisted
295:The News
118:View log
54:RoySmith
39:or in a
838:WP:DEL4
834:Comment
817:Neutral
804:Comment
704:Strauss
602:Strauss
514:WP refs
502:scholar
463:Strauss
447:. The
292:- See:
273:Comment
165:WP refs
153:scholar
91:protect
86:history
881:Ifnord
877:Ishtar
842:WP:G11
776:WP:NFF
753:, and
747:. And
734:find
728:Update
486:Google
437:Delete
356:Delete
260:Vorbee
137:Google
95:delete
57:(talk)
784:WP:NF
550:WP:NF
529:JSTOR
490:books
180:JSTOR
141:books
125:Stats
112:views
104:watch
100:links
16:<
885:talk
869:Keep
859:5969
856:Onel
850:Keep
825:talk
763:Dawn
709:talk
677:talk
607:talk
546:Keep
522:FENS
496:news
468:talk
449:wait
426:talk
368:talk
347:talk
304:talk
290:Wait
281:talk
264:talk
209:talk
195:See
173:FENS
147:news
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
50:keep
780:has
758:(1)
739:(2)
662:As
556:by
536:TWL
398:947
187:TWL
116:– (
887:)
852:.
827:)
701:Dr
679:)
599:Dr
516:)
460:Dr
428:)
370:)
362:.
349:)
306:)
298:-
283:)
266:)
242:.
223:.
211:)
203:.
167:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
883:(
823:(
690::
686:@
675:(
668::
664:@
660::
656:@
622::
618:@
592::
588:@
540:)
532:·
526:·
518:·
511:·
505:·
499:·
493:·
488:(
480:(
424:(
393:J
366:(
345:(
302:(
279:(
262:(
207:(
191:)
183:·
177:·
169:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
139:(
131:(
128:)
121:·
114:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.