208:
article lists verifiable speculations rather than unverifiable ones and the buildings listed (seeing as they're listed as tallest buildings and structures) would be of interest as an article topic if they were built. The rest of the guideline also doesn't give me any indication how these structures would fit the criteria. -
223:- this is a very useful article that is on a notable topic. Many of the planned proposed structures are verifiable. The Space Elevator, for example, has been exhaustively discussed in journal article and science fiction for decades. The fact that no one has built one is not a reason to regard this as crystal-ballery. -
248:
precipitating from the sky. The broad topic of the list is one that merits coverage in en encyclopedia, and the various entries are mostly well referenced. It is somewhat speculative, yes, but this is not an unjustified flight of fancy about what the future may hold, it is speculation covered in
207:
does not apply. I'll cite from the policy page. "ikipedia is not a collection of unverifiable speculation. All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred." The
152:
about future events. Article is only on notable historical and extant plans for buildings, and some well referenced credible scientific research from refereed publications. As CRYSTAL states:
87:
82:
91:
74:
177:
120:
297:
to delete articles on anything proposed or planned. Of course WP:CRYSTAL only forbids unverifiable topics, not simply because they're proposed or planned. --
78:
70:
62:
327:
306:
285:
264:
232:
215:
193:
169:
139:
56:
17:
154:
Of course, we do and should have articles about notable artistic works, essays, or credible research that embody predictions.
342:
36:
341:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
228:
213:
135:
323:
189:
165:
302:
279:
224:
209:
315:
294:
241:
204:
127:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
319:
181:
157:
257:
245:
298:
273:
50:
108:
131:
250:
335:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
156:. In my opinion this is a clear cut encyclopedic article.- (
115:
104:
100:
96:
178:
List of tallest buildings and structures in the world
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
345:). No further edits should be made to this page.
203:. Not only is this a valid split off, I believe
272:— it's not crystalballery if it is verifiable.
8:
176:Note the article was simply split off of
71:Proposed tall buildings and structures
63:Proposed tall buildings and structures
7:
293:- Frequently users attempt to use
24:
128:Knowledge is not a crystal ball
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
328:02:25, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
307:01:13, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
286:00:20, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
265:22:45, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
233:22:31, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
216:20:52, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
194:20:23, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
170:20:17, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
140:20:08, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
57:05:19, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
318:in this gem on an article.
362:
244:I detect are the ones of
338:Please do not modify it.
180:due to space reasons.- (
32:Please do not modify it.
150:unverifiable nonsense
249:reliable sources.
44:The result was
353:
340:
282:
276:
255:
148:CRYSTAL forbids
118:
112:
94:
53:
34:
361:
360:
356:
355:
354:
352:
351:
350:
349:
343:deletion review
336:
280:
274:
261:
251:
114:
85:
69:
66:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
359:
357:
348:
347:
331:
330:
309:
288:
267:
259:
235:
225:Richard Cavell
218:
197:
196:
173:
172:
125:
124:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
358:
346:
344:
339:
333:
332:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
310:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
289:
287:
283:
277:
271:
268:
266:
263:
262:
256:
254:
247:
243:
239:
236:
234:
230:
226:
222:
219:
217:
214:
211:
206:
202:
199:
198:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
175:
174:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
144:
143:
142:
141:
137:
133:
129:
122:
117:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
337:
334:
311:
290:
269:
258:
252:
237:
220:
200:
185:
161:
153:
149:
145:
126:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
240:- the only
320:Ecoleetage
295:WP:CRYSTAL
205:WP:CRYSTAL
186:Wolfkeeper
162:Wolfkeeper
246:water ice
299:Oakshade
275:MuZemike
242:crystals
121:View log
316:crystal
88:protect
83:history
52:MBisanz
132:Stifle
116:delete
92:delete
119:) – (
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
324:talk
312:Keep
303:talk
291:Keep
281:talk
270:Keep
253:Reyk
238:Keep
229:talk
221:Keep
201:Keep
190:Talk
182:User
166:Talk
158:User
146:Keep
136:talk
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
46:keep
314:No
260:YO!
210:Mgm
326:)
305:)
284:)
231:)
192:)
184:)
168:)
160:)
138:)
130:.
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
48:.
322:(
301:(
278:(
227:(
212:|
188:(
164:(
134:(
123:)
113:(
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.