Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Psychopsema - Knowledge

Source 📝

197:, attributed to "Angela-May Worthington, Senior Staff writer, SSEC" (the organization where the term was originated), and all dated 5 March, the same date this article was input, and almost certainly the same source. If speedy-deleted as a copyright violation, it is likely that a copyright release would be made, so it seems to me better to bring it straight here. 215:: "Articles on neologisms are commonly deleted, as these articles are often created in an attempt to use Knowledge to increase usage of the term...To support an article about a particular term or concept we must cite reliable 193:. The term was coined only last month, but the book cited as a reference was published in 1994, and none of the external links provided mentions it. A search finds a number of uses in the internet, all in identical words e.g. 158: 247: 273:
as the reference clearly has nothing to do with the neologism itself. Maybe at some point in the future, this will be ready for Knowledge, but as of now clearly fails WP:NEO.
119: 152: 227:
the term... Neologisms that are in wide use but for which there are no treatments in secondary sources are not yet ready for use and coverage in Knowledge."
92: 87: 17: 216: 96: 173: 140: 79: 290:
unable to find reliable, secondary sources which provide extensive coverage of the term. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NEO, etc. --
335: 36: 334:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
134: 130: 320: 296: 282: 262: 239: 61: 83: 315: 294: 180: 166: 205: 75: 67: 230:
This is not yet even in wide use. It is not Knowledge's job to help a campaign to establish it.
204:
suggested that the term should actually be "Phychopsema" and there are references to that, e.g.
305: 56: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
208:, also attributed to SSEC. It appears that even the spelling of the word is not yet settled. 278: 258: 235: 201: 309: 291: 146: 212: 190: 50: 113: 274: 254: 231: 328:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
304:- for all the reasons stated, not to mention a serious case of 194: 109: 105: 101: 165: 248:
list of Social science-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 338:). No further edits should be made to this page. 189:Contested PROD. This is a completely unsourced 179: 8: 246:Note: This debate has been included in the 245: 223:the term or concept, not books and papers 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 355: 321:18:24, 24 March 2011 (UTC) 297:21:44, 21 March 2011 (UTC) 283:21:30, 21 March 2011 (UTC) 263:21:29, 21 March 2011 (UTC) 240:21:13, 21 March 2011 (UTC) 62:16:29, 27 March 2011 (UTC) 219:such as books and papers 331:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 202:undeletion request 265: 251: 217:secondary sources 346: 333: 318: 312: 252: 184: 183: 169: 117: 99: 44:The result was 34: 354: 353: 349: 348: 347: 345: 344: 343: 342: 336:deletion review 329: 316: 310: 126: 90: 74: 71: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 352: 350: 341: 340: 324: 323: 299: 285: 267: 266: 187: 186: 123: 70: 65: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 351: 339: 337: 332: 326: 325: 322: 319: 313: 307: 303: 302:Strong delete 300: 298: 295: 293: 289: 286: 284: 280: 276: 272: 269: 268: 264: 260: 256: 249: 244: 243: 242: 241: 237: 233: 228: 226: 222: 218: 214: 209: 207: 203: 198: 196: 192: 182: 178: 175: 172: 168: 164: 160: 157: 154: 151: 148: 145: 142: 139: 136: 132: 129: 128:Find sources: 124: 121: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 58: 53: 52: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 330: 327: 301: 287: 270: 229: 224: 220: 210: 199: 188: 176: 170: 162: 155: 149: 143: 137: 127: 55: 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 311:Orange Mike 153:free images 76:Psychopsema 68:Psychopsema 306:WP:SOAPBOX 292:joe decker 191:neologism 225:that use 120:View log 159:WP refs 147:scholar 93:protect 88:history 51:postdlf 288:Delete 275:Kansan 271:Delete 255:JohnCD 232:JohnCD 213:WP:NEO 131:Google 97:delete 46:DELETE 221:about 174:JSTOR 135:books 114:views 106:watch 102:links 16:< 317:Talk 308:. -- 279:talk 259:talk 236:talk 211:Per 206:here 200:The 195:here 167:FENS 141:news 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 57:talk 314:| 181:TWL 118:– ( 48:. 281:) 261:) 250:. 238:) 161:) 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 60:) 277:( 257:( 253:— 234:( 185:) 177:· 171:· 163:· 156:· 150:· 144:· 138:· 133:( 125:( 122:) 116:) 78:( 54:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
postdlf
talk
16:29, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
Psychopsema
Psychopsema
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
neologism
here
undeletion request
here

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.