124:
668:•I believe that the descriptions of the individual episode plots should be deleted because they have nothing to do with the show's importance, and that they detract from the humour of the show. Facts such as the release date, the running time, and memorable moments (songs, quotes, shots, etc) should be the only items included in the episode descriptions.
551:
can't, but you should give it a try) then go CREATE and ADD, don't fucking start PROPOSING DELETION OF A REMARKABLE THING such as Pure Pwnage. Now may I ask you, have you ever fucking even visited the website, seen any episode, or otherwise fucking seen that Pure Pwnage is a serious project and has at least 40 000 viewers and 1,5 million web page hits?
364:- Site's forum shows 11672 registerers. Within minutes of the last episodes release, hundreds of people already started downloading via bittorrent (500 or so, I recall). It barely fails the google test, and by its pattern, within the next episode's release it'll pass all tests. This article already voted keep last time.
513:
It seems like it may be somewhat vain now, but I don't think one should go as far as to delete the entire article. It definitely requires cleanup, and then perhaps some information on its impact on society. At the moment, I can't find any more good evidence of notability to add to the ones above. The
459:
5 "citation needed" tags. I've often seen editors remove the information if it's unproven, as well as remove citation tags claiming it is unnecessary, as well as articles filled with information lacking citations that can be proven wrong (and editors revert any citations that prove otherwise), etc.
420:
What competitive online gaming have you done? Ownage, Pwnage, Owned, Pwned, Pure Ownage, Pure Pwnage. It's an expression that means to beat someone easily. In military for instance, the 2-week (or so) destruction of Iraq's former government (the aftereffects were bad, but the initial victory was
383:
is good and demonstrates the concept. Yet, the article is about some website and pretty boring. "...is a webisode series by ROFLMAO Productions featuring a
Canadian professional video game player named Jeremy. The show portrays the making of one "gamer's life". Settings for the show include Toronto
327:
That's from the first 20 pages of Google hits. I believe that would show it had had some effect outside it's community. Oh, and most of them don't name the lead characters, so your "elimination of false positives" was more like elimination of anything that didn't give the full storyline. In fact, a
514:
best thing I can say (empirically) is that I've played in lots of CS:S servers with a large amount of players, and in many of them, there are people who seem to recognize the "BOOM HEADSHOT!" and FPS Doug when I acted like an FPS Doug fanatic (for jokes, of course). Hope that can help, somehow. --
606:
at the
Episode 7 release (when the PP community was smaller than it is now) contains a bunch of info about Pure Pwnage by the way. 62:00 explains the fanbase of an estimated 300K. Some other parts (for which I don't have the timecode, unfortunately,) tell that Jeremy's starting to get recognized
567:
I think better said than the above rant: it looks obvious to me that someone took a glance at the article and thought "a videogame show? words like noob? this must've come from some teenagers and can't possibly entertain an intellectual like myself." Then that person decided his lack of interest
550:
Not to be too vulgaric here, but all I can say is FUCK YOU. 11 000 registered forum members, and let's say, that about 4/5 of every viewer does not register, yet regularly follows the show? Dig your fucking head off your ass, if you want to go CONTRIBUTE to
Knowledge (XXG), (which you obviously
478:
I think you may've missed what the article concerns. The article does not discuss the concept of "pure pwnage" (i.e. those frags looked like pure pwnage). The article concerns the popular web based show about a gamer's life. It has little to do with the "pwn" article.
183:
WP:WEB is for websites, not for video shows. There are far more people that watched the episodes than those that visited the site. Just the fact that there are many people editing this article, and it gets vandalised 5 times a day demonstrated notability.
685:, this webisode does not only entertain people, but also inspires people of the internet generation to put not only their humor, but their art, out there in html, and let the surfers, not the critics, decide what is valuable. --
222:
This is somewhat of a big hit amongst gamers and I know many non-gamers who are aware of it too. Considering the video is known here in the UK, I'd say that was a big enough impact. Therefore,
144:??? It does have a forum with over 10000 registered members, and adding the main character's name does not necessary eliminate false positives in the most efficient way. -
526:
as notable and culturally significant. Plus, it survived a previous AfD, which to me indicates that a renomination needs to have a very strong and compelling reason.
119:
65:
607:
pretty often on the streets, that there were hundreds of users tooned into the TeamSpeak channel at the same time, and more possible evidence of popularity. --
554:
Free advice: the only thing your rant above did was made me itch to change my vote from Keep to Delete. I didn't (nor would I in principle) but please observe
599:•As well, shortly after the release of Episode 9, one can see from the statistics at the bottom that the number of simultaneous forum users reached 915!
455:
A lot of articles are fascinating, including science and math ones. Those aren't boring to me. Thanks for the link to the article name. Odd in
82:
78:
275:
213:
171:
98:
163:(emphasis mine). And provide some meaningful links for us to examine, I did preface this with "unless evedence of notabilty produced". -
469:
Since there is already an article on this subject, I'm not sure how to vote. Basically I think the article needs a lot of revising.
315:
17:
74:
267:
recomendations that aren't supported by verifiable statements. Please you guys, just give me something I can work with. -
110:
329:
722:
665:. The myspace account was created on December 16th, 2005. In less than a month the account has 3285 friends in Myspace.
36:
128:
442:. Also, articles are there not to amuse yourself, so "the article is pretty boring" is a quite dumb thing to say.
273:
211:
169:
96:
721:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
429:
blowing up a planet. Or you play a board game with someone and have such an easy victory you win in 2 moves.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
379:
The title sounds like the gaming concept of "Pure Pwnage," which should be an article. The article's picture
671:•The entry should be kept, as the top search results on both google and teoma for the term "Pure Pwnage" is
707:
689:
649:
637:
625:
611:
572:
562:
542:
530:
518:
505:
483:
473:
464:
450:
433:
413:
396:
354:
340:
291:
277:
246:
234:
215:
192:
173:
151:
132:
100:
52:
502:
311:
AusGamers host file, so quite possible it is liked on the other side of the world from where it is filmed
569:
646:
268:
206:
164:
91:
49:
320:
593:
constantly have dozens of users online – typically 100+ during the eastern North
American evenings.
480:
470:
461:
430:
393:
367:
568:
qualifies as vanity and should merit deleting something that many people, in fact, have interest.
608:
515:
337:
231:
555:
389:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
252:
198:
86:
704:
305:
148:
123:
141:
70:
686:
634:
622:
288:
243:
202:
700:
559:
527:
333:
227:
201:
for "far more". I'm not drooling over deleting this, I'd just like to see something
310:
385:
661:•For anyone who is in doubt of the popularity of the show, please keep an eye on
539:
422:
145:
58:
263:
appropriateness according to encyclopedic standards. Many closing admins will
81:
when we include the main character's name to eliminate some false positives.)
596:•Judging by many of the member profiles, the forums seem quite international.
443:
406:
351:
185:
662:
426:
392:, too. So "Pure Pwnage" should be, but not about some cheezy website.
682:
603:
255:. This isn't a vote, it's a discussion where we attempt to determine
384:
and occasion..." ::ho hum:: It's all this person's life and that.
380:
715:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
678:
590:
456:
439:
672:
287:- Require cleanup, but article itself should be kept.
157:"A forum with more than 5,000 users that has made a
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
405:Huh? There is no gaming concept of "Pure Pwnage".
89:. Delete unless evedence of notabilty produced.
725:). No further edits should be made to this page.
159:verifiable impact beyond its own user community
306:Technology company works with Pure Pwnage team
253:testimony of wikipedia editors is not a source
8:
584:If popularity may be a factor for some...
381:http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:Nonoobs.jpg
421:easy), The Vogons destruction of earth,
251:Not to sound like a broken record, but
538:appears to be non-notable and vanity.
85:unrelated news hit, Alexa just shy of
77:but nothing substantial (and drops to
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
330:Google search with FPS Doug included
24:
621:. The videos has culture impact.
350:per excellent comments above. --
122:
438:There is already an article on
366:Unsigned comment left by user:
321:Discuss TV have posts on it...
1:
44:The result of the debate was
708:21:49, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
690:08:44, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
53:23:02, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
650:07:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
638:05:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
626:02:16, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
612:00:54, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
573:02:36, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
563:23:36, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
543:02:49, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
531:19:52, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
519:19:22, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
506:18:08, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
484:15:58, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
474:14:50, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
465:14:46, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
451:13:16, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
434:13:02, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
414:12:42, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
397:10:54, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
355:03:08, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
341:00:20, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
292:00:04, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
278:23:42, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
247:21:42, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
235:19:49, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
216:16:12, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
193:16:01, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
174:15:40, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
152:15:09, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
140:, how exactly does it fail
133:14:31, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
101:13:49, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
742:
677:•I beleive that just like
316:UK interest in Pure Pwnage
655:Keep- but needs some work
69:Not encyclopedic. Fails
718:Please do not modify it.
501:I agree it is vanity. --
205:to show it's notable. -
32:Please do not modify it.
663:Jeremy's Myspace Page
332:gets 10,200 results.
259:community consensus
589:•The Pure Pwnage
548:Very obvious keep
371:
109:apparent vanity.
733:
720:
448:
411:
388:is an article.
365:
271:
209:
190:
167:
126:
114:
94:
34:
741:
740:
736:
735:
734:
732:
731:
730:
729:
723:deletion review
716:
679:Homestar Runner
643:Definately Keep
444:
407:
269:
207:
186:
165:
121:
112:
92:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
739:
737:
728:
727:
711:
710:
693:
692:
675:
669:
666:
658:
657:
652:
640:
628:
615:
614:
604:TeamSpeak chat
600:
597:
594:
586:
585:
579:
578:
577:
576:
575:
545:
533:
521:
508:
503:Zachary Murray
495:
494:
493:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
471:DyslexicEditor
467:
462:DyslexicEditor
431:DyslexicEditor
417:
416:
400:
399:
394:DyslexicEditor
376:Change Subject
372:
358:
357:
344:
343:
325:
324:
323:
318:
313:
308:
300:
299:
294:
282:
281:
280:
237:
220:
219:
218:
178:
177:
176:
135:
118:
90:
68:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
738:
726:
724:
719:
713:
712:
709:
706:
702:
698:
695:
694:
691:
688:
684:
680:
676:
674:
670:
667:
664:
660:
659:
656:
653:
651:
648:
644:
641:
639:
636:
632:
629:
627:
624:
620:
617:
616:
613:
610:
609:HeteroZellous
605:
601:
598:
595:
592:
588:
587:
583:
580:
574:
571:
566:
565:
564:
561:
557:
553:
552:
549:
546:
544:
541:
537:
534:
532:
529:
525:
522:
520:
517:
516:HeteroZellous
512:
509:
507:
504:
500:
497:
496:
485:
482:
477:
476:
475:
472:
468:
466:
463:
458:
454:
453:
452:
449:
447:
441:
437:
436:
435:
432:
428:
424:
419:
418:
415:
412:
410:
404:
403:
402:
401:
398:
395:
391:
387:
382:
378:
377:
373:
369:
363:
360:
359:
356:
353:
349:
346:
345:
342:
339:
335:
331:
326:
322:
319:
317:
314:
312:
309:
307:
304:
303:
302:
301:
298:
295:
293:
290:
286:
283:
279:
276:
274:
272:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
249:
248:
245:
241:
238:
236:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
214:
212:
210:
204:
200:
196:
195:
194:
191:
189:
182:
179:
175:
172:
170:
168:
162:
160:
155:
154:
153:
150:
147:
143:
139:
136:
134:
131:
130:
125:
120:
116:
108:
105:
104:
103:
102:
99:
97:
95:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
67:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
717:
714:
696:
683:Red vs. Blue
654:
642:
630:
618:
581:
547:
535:
523:
510:
498:
445:
408:
386:Power Gaming
375:
374:
361:
347:
296:
284:
264:
260:
256:
242:, See above
239:
223:
187:
181:Obvious keep
180:
158:
156:
137:
127:
106:
66:previous AfD
63:
45:
43:
31:
28:
705:Colonel Cow
673:Pure Pwnage
570:65.6.109.43
423:Darth Vadar
138:Strong Keep
75:200K google
59:Pure Pwnage
687:Deagrathen
647:DeathStarr
635:Kingturtle
623:SYSS Mouse
390:God-moding
289:Infinity0
270:brenneman
265:disregard
244:Zerak-Tul
208:brenneman
166:brenneman
115:you know?
111:Just zis
93:brenneman
701:Turnstep
602:•A Live
582:Comment:
560:Turnstep
556:WP:CIVIL
528:Turnstep
481:Ncannino
427:The Lexx
368:Ncannino
499:Delete.
297:Comment
199:WP:CITE
197:Please
64:KEEP IT
591:forums
540:Stifle
536:Delete
142:WP:WEB
107:Delete
87:40,000
71:WP:WEB
50:Ichiro
511:Keep.
446:Grue
409:Grue
188:Grue
16:<
703:. --
699:per
697:Keep
681:and
631:keep
619:Keep
524:Keep
362:Keep
352:JJay
348:Keep
338:nage
285:Keep
257:both
240:Keep
232:nage
224:keep
203:WP:V
129:AfD?
113:Guy,
46:keep
457:pwn
440:pwn
425:or
334:Kel
261:and
228:Kel
149:fan
146:sec
83:One
79:600
73:,
645:.
633:.
558:.
226:.
48:--
370:.
336:-
230:-
161:"
117:/
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
