Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/QCubed - Knowledge (XXG)

Source đź“ť

31: 393:
I still find it hard to decide what the article is about. I'm not completely stupid computer-wise - I used to program in COBOL many years ago (I could even understand the MicroFocus manual...). I would like an explanation of what's what in English rather than have it all in jargon. This is a problem
295:
mainly on grounds of notability. If I knew what they were talking about, I might change my mind - either way. I hope their code writing is clearer than their explanation. Article is not very spammy - just a bit too enthusiastic. Could do with more outside references. There may be some - quite a few
445:
The page has been cleaned up substantially, I believe the main reason this was flagged is because of the links and the way it was worded, all of these have been changed to be more informative to the general public. There are 1,000 of frameworks just like QCubed, which all have a similar wiki
374:
I've cleaned up the article to attempt to address these concerns. We're definitely a real product with as much right to be here as CakePHP, and while we are currently attempting to raise awareness, our userbase is already at 300+ developers -- VexedPanda, QCubed core contributor
198:
QCubed is a PHP5 framework. It's a fork of the Qcodo PHP5 framework. The site is not spam. The framework is being used by several people. -- marcosdsanchez, QCubed core contributor.
149: 425:
I have made another pass on the article to make it less "geeky" and more appealing to the general audience. alex94040, qcubed core contributor. 16:03, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
247: 40: 191:
We're just trying to get some objective information about the framework in. There's a very similar article about competing frameworks - CakePHP (
432: 376: 210: 17: 508: 490: 65: 46: 116: 111: 279: 120: 489:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
473: 451: 64:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
436: 380: 214: 103: 428: 206: 469: 447: 182: 275: 161: 413: 233: 107: 455: 417: 403: 384: 365: 348: 328: 305: 283: 262: 237: 218: 186: 165: 85: 339:
now I can understand enough about what they're doing. Needs more reliable outside linking yet.
399: 361: 344: 324: 301: 257: 58:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
178: 99: 91: 157: 502: 409: 229: 446:
articles, and are even more techy than this one. Basilieus, QCubed core contributor
467:- Article was edited to be non-technical and almost everyone can undestand it now. 395: 357: 340: 320: 297: 254: 79: 137: 408:
It's still spam. Just in a prettier can. No-one "has a right" to an article.
483:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
25: 319:
as they're translating it into English... Will wait and see.
173:
Might be. Definitely too technical for a general audience.
273:- Appears to not meet notability requirements at this time. 192: 144: 133: 129: 125: 394:with articles (and manuals...) written by experts. 68:). No further edits should be made to this page. 493:). No further edits should be made to this page. 356:Agree with marcosdsanchez, now comprehensible. 248:list of Software-related deletion discussions 8: 228:as Spam. A look at the links tells all. 195:). -- alex94040, QCubed core contributor. 246:: This debate has been included in the 45:For an explanation of the process, see 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 177:in present form as possible spam. -- 41:deletion review on 2009 January 28 24: 29: 193:http://en.wikipedia.org/CakePHP 47:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review 1: 456:20:20, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 418:15:06, 25 January 2009 (UTC) 404:23:29, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 385:23:20, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 366:19:56, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 349:12:32, 25 January 2009 (UTC) 329:20:57, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 306:22:17, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 284:21:57, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 263:19:07, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 238:18:50, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 219:22:04, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 187:18:47, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 166:18:43, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 86:03:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 525: 509:Pages at deletion review 486:Please do not modify it. 61:Please do not modify it. 477:21:45, 25 January 2009 156:Blatant advertising? 73:The result was 431:comment added by 315:Current position 265: 251: 209:comment added by 53: 52: 39:was subject to a 516: 488: 440: 260: 252: 242: 221: 147: 141: 123: 82: 63: 33: 32: 26: 524: 523: 519: 518: 517: 515: 514: 513: 499: 498: 497: 491:deletion review 484: 426: 296:ghits, I think 276:LinguistAtLarge 258: 204: 143: 114: 98: 95: 80: 66:deletion review 59: 37:This discussion 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 522: 520: 512: 511: 501: 500: 496: 495: 479: 478: 470:marcosdsanchez 461: 460: 459: 458: 448:JonKirkpatrick 443: 442: 441: 433:216.254.12.195 420: 388: 387: 371: 370: 369: 368: 351: 332: 309: 308: 287: 286: 267: 266: 240: 202: 201: 200: 199: 196: 189: 154: 153: 94: 89: 71: 70: 54: 51: 50: 44: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 521: 510: 507: 506: 504: 494: 492: 487: 481: 480: 476: 475: 471: 466: 463: 462: 457: 453: 449: 444: 438: 434: 430: 424: 421: 419: 415: 411: 410:Fiddle Faddle 407: 406: 405: 401: 397: 392: 391: 390: 389: 386: 382: 378: 377:68.145.111.83 373: 372: 367: 363: 359: 355: 352: 350: 346: 342: 338: 337: 333: 331: 330: 326: 322: 318: 313: 312: 311: 310: 307: 303: 299: 294: 293: 289: 288: 285: 282: 281: 277: 272: 269: 268: 264: 261: 256: 249: 245: 241: 239: 235: 231: 230:Fiddle Faddle 227: 226:Speedy Delete 224: 223: 222: 220: 216: 212: 211:131.107.0.101 208: 197: 194: 190: 188: 184: 180: 176: 172: 171: 170: 169: 168: 167: 163: 159: 151: 146: 139: 135: 131: 127: 122: 118: 113: 109: 105: 101: 97: 96: 93: 90: 88: 87: 84: 83: 76: 69: 67: 62: 56: 55: 48: 42: 38: 35: 28: 27: 19: 485: 482: 468: 464: 422: 353: 335: 334: 316: 314: 291: 290: 274: 270: 243: 225: 203: 174: 155: 78: 74: 72: 60: 57: 36: 427:—Preceding 292:Weak delete 271:Weak delete 205:—Preceding 179:PMDrive1061 336:Weak Keep 158:Cssiitcic 503:Category 429:unsigned 207:unsigned 150:View log 396:Peridon 358:Peridon 341:Peridon 321:Peridon 317:Neutral 298:Peridon 255:the wub 117:protect 112:history 81:MBisanz 175:Delete 145:delete 121:delete 100:QCubed 92:QCubed 75:delete 148:) – ( 138:views 130:watch 126:links 16:< 465:Keep 452:talk 437:talk 423:Keep 414:talk 400:talk 381:talk 362:talk 354:Keep 345:talk 325:talk 302:talk 259:"?!" 244:Note 234:talk 215:talk 183:talk 162:talk 134:logs 108:talk 104:edit 474:Msg 280:Msg 253:-- 250:. 505:: 472:• 454:) 439:) 416:) 402:) 383:) 364:) 347:) 327:) 304:) 278:• 236:) 217:) 185:) 164:) 136:| 132:| 128:| 124:| 119:| 115:| 110:| 106:| 77:. 43:. 450:( 435:( 412:( 398:( 379:( 360:( 343:( 323:( 300:( 232:( 213:( 181:( 160:( 152:) 142:( 140:) 102:( 49:.

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review on 2009 January 28
Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
deletion review
MBisanz
03:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
QCubed
QCubed
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
Cssiitcic
talk
18:43, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
PMDrive1061
talk
18:47, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/CakePHP
unsigned
131.107.0.101
talk
22:04, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑