722:
article could be improved with less emphasis on the videos produced by the reporters and put more emphasis be put on the ISAF operations with embedded professional reporters. Perhaps a good title is "ISAF operations with embedded professional reporters." I am open to other titles or other revisions to improve the article. I don't believe it is reasonable to "userfy" or delete this article. Right now the article is just in its infancy. It is easy to throw rocks at something that was just created less than 1 day ago. I believe this article could evolve in something very useful; if given a chance. I am really surprised that you don't see value in the article. I am wondering ... Have you viewed any of the videos in full? They are only a few minutes long. Please take a few minutes and view a few of the videos in full from several different countries. It is quite interesting to see how different countries conduct military operations. Perhaps you might change your mind after seeing the rich content that the professional reporters add. If the article is not going to be deleted I would I would like to write a more detailed summary of the video and relate that summary to more
Knowledge (XXG) links. Best regards,
248:
other
Knowledge (XXG) sites and other sites could efficiently reference it with a single link. The site I created contains the many Knowledge (XXG) references that allow for deeper exploration of the topics of different countries, geographic locations, flags, dates, etc. This interrelation of the external links along with the Knowledge (XXG) content create product that is very useful and unique. This type of site could not be created without being part of Knowledge (XXG). I would be interested in an additional suggestions from you on how to adapt the Knowledge (XXG) site I have created. I look forward to hearing your response. Best regards,
406:
752:
at least one of the videos is currently from a non-NATO source. I completely agree that many more videos are needed from non-NATO sources. If this article is not deleted then I plan to add other references from non-NATO sources. I am hoping that this resolves this issue so I can move forward and clean up this article. I appreciate your feedback and I learned a lot about
Knowledge (XXG):Notability policy and WP:NOTLINK policy in the process of this discussion. Best regards,
374:
285:- Hmmm i can understand why this article was put up for AFD, in its current format it seems to go against the guidelines . Saying that i do think its pretty useful information and clearly the editor responsible is willing to put in work to make the article acceptable. This is just a suggestion and i dont know if it would make things any better or any less likely to be deleted but perhaps a slightly different title and format could be chosen.
528:". This collection of links was very difficult for me to find, document and cross-reference in Knowledge (XXG). I get the impression from you that you feel this list is trival and any 6 year old could create in a few seconds. Most of the videos on the internet are very low quality and are not made by professional news reporters. To me it seems that these quality videos are like gems to be preserved. Best regards,
361:
419:
387:
228:
directories. There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of
Knowledge (XXG). On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate. See Knowledge (XXG):External links for some guidelines. ..."
330:
references. I have noticed that many of the locations in this site do not even have a
Knowledge (XXG) page to link to. I am hoping that in the future these additional geographical locations have Knowledge (XXG) pages. To some extent Knowledge (XXG) can be tepid. Quality videos from multiple sources energize and give more depth and meaning to Knowledge (XXG).
75:
102:
97:
106:
89:
650:- The site in question contains numerous internal links to Knowledge (XXG). - If we assume that all of these links are notable then the site that references them is also likely to be notable. - In addition, it seems reasonable to assume that reports from professional news reporters have been verified.
955:
Dear Tavix, I appreciate your feedback. However, please provide a more detailed response that explains your position so I can respond. I have the same concern as with user=Location (above). Please respond and let me know if you have viewed a few of the videos in full from several different countries.
781:
Dear
Cordless Larry, I agree that other media references (video and non-video) are needed to establish notability for this article. I believe I have found a fairly large number of independent media references. I would like to get your advice. Should I try to improve the article or should I create new
736:
Well, as it stands the topic of the article is "Quality Videos of ISAF Afghanistan
Operations with Embedded Reporters - Listed by Member Country". If you were to change that to "ISAF operations with embedded professional reporters" (and move the article accordingly) then you might be able to make the
721:
The article's subject is "ISAF operations with embedded professional reporters." I believe this is a very important and notable subject. It is the presence of the embedded reporters that give the article strong notability. I am willing to rename the article if that would help. Also, I agree that the
223:
Please do not delete this site! I believe that
Cordless Larry is interpreting the WP:NOTLINK policy in a very draconian manner. Also, I do not believe this site should be deleted because it contains useful content that is not available anywhere else (on or off the internet.) I believe Knowledge (XXG)
618:
Dear
Cordless Larry, You and I really disagree about guidelines at Knowledge (XXG):Notability. Just because a video is hosted on YouTube doesn't mean it can be found reliably, repeatable (and unedited) tomorrow, next week or a year from now. If YouTube is your main concern then I believe many or all
814:
Dear
Cordless Larry, Per your advice, I have created the following page in my userspace - "User:Mfstelmach/ISAF Afghanistan and related operations with embedded professional reporters." Let me know if you have any suggestions to improve this title. I will let you know when I feel the new article is
751:
Dear Cordless Larry, I agree! This article really does need a name change to "ISAF operations with embedded professional reporters" (or something similar.) I plan to do this. Also, it is a problem that most of the references are from NATO and more non-video references are needed. However, I believe
523:
Dear Cordless Larry, Please explain why you feel the list described by BritishWatcher would not be notable. This topic is extremely timely and contains information that is important to many countries in the world. I disagree that the links would be better placed at International Security Assistance
232:
of site could not be created without being part of Knowledge (XXG). If a decision is made to delete my site then I believe that the WP:NOTLINK policy is being too narrowly interpreted and I would like to know the procedure for changing the WP:NOTLINK policy to make it more pragmatic and reasonable.
231:
The site I created is NOT a "Mere collections of external links". In addition to containing external links the site references many related Knowledge (XXG) sites. This interrelation of the external links along with the Knowledge (XXG) content create product that is very useful and unique. This type
912:
Dear Location, I appreciate your feedback. However, please provide a more detailed response that explains your position so I can respond. Also, please respond and let me know if you have viewed a few of the videos in full from several different countries. I am concerned that you may be judging the
562:
Dear NVO, Please say more about the "bibliographies" that you mentioned. Are you talking about a private bibliographies that users keep on the own computer or a bibliography on a Knowledge (XXG) page. Also, you seem to feel that it is difficult to determine "quality". I suggest that videos made by
247:
is extremely disorganized, chaotic, and confusing/difficult to navigate. I do not see any value in linking to a site like that. There should be a way in Knowledge (XXG) to organize external sites with additional Knowledge (XXG) content. A Knowledge (XXG) site like this would not interfere with any
294:. It could then list each operation (perhaps with a little explanation) and link the video as a source. There are countless articles / lists on wikipedia less useful and notable with noone prepared to do any work on them. Id hate to see a useful article get deleted. Dont know what others think
174:
329:
Below are a list of the eighteen (18) Knowledge (XXG) internal links that are currently in this site. I believe this is a large number of references for a site that was first created today. I am hoping that this site is not deleted so I have the opportunity to add many more Knowledge (XXG)
227:
Below is the text from WP:NOTLINK: "Knowledge (XXG) is not a ... repository of links ... Policy shortcuts: WP:NOTLINK ... Knowledge (XXG) is neither a mirror nor a repository of links, images, or media files. Knowledge (XXG) articles are not: 1. Mere collections of external links or Internet
628:
2. "Reliable means sources need editorial integrity to allow verifiable evaluation of notability, per the reliable source guideline. Sources may encompass published works in all forms and media. Availability of secondary sources covering the subject is a good test for notability."
600:
Dear NVO and Cordless Larry, I do not believe that moving this site to my userspace is a good solution. It trivializes the material and keeps others from editing, improving, and correcting the material. I believe this site belongs in the Knowledge (XXG) main space. Best regards,
815:
ready to move to the main encyclopedia to get any feedback from you. I am hoping to get this new article finished quickly. And in the meantime, I would like my current article to not be deleted until my new article is ready. How does that approach sound to you. Best regards,
766:
I'm glad to hear that my comments were helpful. I really don't think that any of the videos can be used to establish notability though since they come from the same embedded reporters who are part of the topic of the article. You'd need to find properly independent coverage.
1020:
224:
should be careful about deleting valuable content. Also, I do not believe the site I created violates the WP:NOTLINK policy. The site is not "solely" a list of external links. It contains many references to other Knowledge (XXG) sites. See discussion below.
632:- All forms of media are acceptable so external video links as well as internal Knowledge (XXG) links are both considered to be reliable. - Having muliple professional news reporters that are at least one step removed provide reliable secondary sources.
956:
I am concerned that you may be judging the videos without even watching them. Remember Knowledge (XXG):Notability guidelines ... "Sources may encompass published works in all forms and media." Is there a bias against the media of videos? Best regards,
168:
688:
I am arguing that the SITE is notable and the site includes the operations, the videos, the internal wikipedia links, the external links and the Gestalt synergy of the combined result. The whole exceeds the sum of the parts. Best regards,
707:? The point is that every Knowledge (XXG) article needs a subject, and that subject needs to be notable. At the moment, the article's subject is a collection of videos, which are not notable according to the criteria used to judge this.
970:
Mfstelmach, the point is that the videos are the subject of the article. They cannot be used to establish their own notability. That requires an independent source. To save space here, I'm going to try to explain this further on your
547:, the topic of the article needs to be the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. This has nothing to do with preserving the videos since they are hosted on YouTube in any case.
619:
of video references that are produced by multiple professional news reporters are available from multiple sources other than YouTube. Getting back to guidelines at Knowledge (XXG):Notability. Let me go through them one a time:
1134:
1117:
1100:
1080:
1053:
1032:
1011:
984:
965:
948:
922:
905:
860:
842:
824:
809:
791:
776:
761:
746:
731:
716:
698:
683:
668:
610:
595:
572:
556:
537:
518:
499:
484:
321:
303:
275:
257:
218:
59:
913:
videos without even watching them. Remember Knowledge (XXG):Notability guidelines ... "Sources may encompass published works in all forms and media." Is there a bias against the media of videos? Best regards,
189:
156:
656:- The site in question has coverage from multiple reliable sources including different countries armed forces, new reporters, - international organizations, etc. - This seems to be sufficient coverage.
1091:- This article is explicitly a repository of links. No amount of renaming attempts changes this. The test is to remove all the external links. Do we still have a viable article after that? No. --
996:. The notion of collecting these links is better handled by setting up a YouTube account, and using it to compile the list. YouTube allows that, with commentary. Knowledge (XXG) is not a webhost.
150:
737:
case that the topic is notable. I don't think that the videos alone would establish the notability of such an article though because they are not independent since they are published by NATO.
146:
93:
196:
85:
65:
524:
Force (ISAF) site. Putting too many links on the ISAF site might unbalance that site. This way only one link on the ISAF would be needed to link to the hypothetical site named: "
490:
The article may have a number of links to other Knowledge (XXG) articles, but its subject is external videos. These are not notable enough for their own Knowledge (XXG) article.
135:
851:. If I can get my new article finished quickly enough then the deletion of the current article will become a moot point. Thanks again for the help and advice. Best regards,
635:
3. "Sources, for notability purposes, should be secondary sources, as those provide the most objective evidence of notability ... Multiple sources are generally preferred."
162:
266:. It's not much different from bibliographies that many users maintain. Has no place in main space - wikipedia is not a directory of so-called "quality" (who says?) videos.
1065:
932:
I really don't see why this even needs to be userfy'd. The video linkspam is not notable and shouldn't be on Knowledge (XXG). Other then that, I second what Larry said.
829:
That sounds fine other than the request to delay potential deletion. I'm not sure whether that is possible. The deletion discussion will probably continue per
625:- Professional news reports address the subject directly in detail, and no original research is needed to extract the content. - This seems clear enough.
797:
447:
334:
309:
240:
653:
6. "Notability is not temporary: a topic needs to have had sufficient coverage in reliable sources to meet the general notability guideline..."
622:
1. "Significant coverage means that sources address the subject directly in detail, and no original research is needed to extract the content."
505:
Dear BritishWatcher, Thank you for your comments. I would be more than willing to change the title to what you suggest or something similar ...
647:
5. "Notability requires verifiable evidence it is not enough to simply assert that a topic is notable without substantiating that claim."
509:. I would also be happy to make any reasonable changes to the content to make it more compliant with Knowledge (XXG) policy. Best regards,
848:
830:
525:
506:
291:
17:
674:
I'm now confused about what you are arguing is notable. Are you arguing that the operations are notable or that the videos are?
352:
435:
1149:
659:
If my above understanding of Knowledge (XXG):Notability is wrong then please explain what I am missing. Best regards,
36:
76:
Articles for deletion/Quality Videos of ISAF Afghanistan Operations with Embedded Reporters - Listed by Member Country
441:
644:- Again multiple professional news reporters seem to me to be one of the most independent of sources that exist.
638:- Multiple professional news reporters seem to me to be one of the most objective secondary sources that exist.
579:
1148:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
1028:
980:
838:
805:
772:
742:
712:
679:
591:
552:
495:
317:
299:
214:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
544:
1130:
1113:
1108:. Unnecessary link farm. Any decent links can easily be factored into other appropriate articles. --
972:
961:
918:
856:
820:
796:
The best thing to do is probably to prepare a replacement article in your userspace (for example, at
787:
757:
727:
694:
664:
606:
582:, which would involve moving the article content to your Knowledge (XXG) namespace, such as the page
568:
533:
514:
480:
397:
253:
1041:
206:
1024:
1006:
976:
834:
801:
768:
738:
708:
675:
587:
548:
491:
313:
295:
210:
182:
901:
641:
4. "Independent of the subject excludes works produced by those affiliated with the subject..."
453:
86:
Quality Videos of ISAF Afghanistan Operations with Embedded Reporters - Listed by Member Country
66:
Quality Videos of ISAF Afghanistan Operations with Embedded Reporters - Listed by Member Country
459:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1021:
User:Mfstelmach/ISAF Afghanistan and related operations with embedded professional reporters
1126:
1076:
1049:
465:
1109:
957:
941:
914:
852:
816:
783:
753:
723:
690:
660:
602:
583:
564:
529:
510:
476:
249:
205:
This article has been created solely as a list of external links to videos, contrary to
1096:
998:
378:
55:
897:
847:
Dear Cordless Larry, I agree that the deletion discussion will probably continue per
410:
271:
123:
782:
article with an improved name. I look forward to hearing from you. Best regards,
1072:
1045:
346:
308:
I don't think such a list would be notable. The links would be better placed at
935:
800:). Then, when you're happy with it, you can move it to the main encyclopedia.
1092:
563:
any professional news reporter be considered a quality video. Best regards,
471:
50:
267:
244:
236:
423:
365:
429:
391:
798:
User:Mfstelmach/ISAF operations with embedded professional reporters
1142:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
340:
896:. The subject of the article (i.e. the videos) is not notable.
235:
Cordless Larry has suggested that I add a single link to the
130:
119:
115:
111:
181:
1040:
This is a textbook example of an article which fails
195:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1152:). No further edits should be made to this page.
526:List of ISAF operations with embedded reporters
507:List of ISAF operations with embedded reporters
292:List of ISAF operations with embedded reporters
1066:list of Military-related deletion discussions
8:
543:Because, in order to meet the guidelines at
1060:
1064:: This debate has been included in the
335:International Security Assistance Force
310:International Security Assistance Force
241:International Security Assistance Force
73:
849:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
831:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
1019:- article creator has usified it to
72:
24:
1125:. Nothing more than a link farm.
417:
404:
385:
372:
359:
353:United Nations Security Council
436:Provincial Reconstruction Team
1:
1135:16:20, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
1118:15:26, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
1101:15:11, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
1081:07:01, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
1054:07:01, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
1033:19:25, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
1012:04:57, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
985:07:50, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
966:04:53, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
949:02:20, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
923:04:53, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
906:00:42, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
861:19:39, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
843:19:30, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
825:19:27, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
810:18:38, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
792:18:34, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
777:14:05, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
762:13:55, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
747:08:05, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
732:01:27, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
717:22:37, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
703:What site? Do you mean the
699:22:35, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
684:22:26, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
669:22:20, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
611:22:35, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
596:21:52, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
573:21:36, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
557:21:25, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
538:21:22, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
519:21:00, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
500:21:04, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
485:20:52, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
322:20:47, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
304:20:43, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
290:For example something like
276:20:41, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
258:20:17, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
219:18:22, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
60:20:38, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
1169:
545:Knowledge (XXG):Notability
442:United States Marine Corps
448:Special Operations Forces
1145:Please do not modify it.
1023:. See discussion above.
32:Please do not modify it.
71:AfDs for this article:
398:Afghan National Army
245:ISAF YouTube channel
237:ISAF YouTube channel
578:NVO is suggesting
454:United States Navy
44:The result was
1083:
1069:
947:
460:Operation Khanjar
1160:
1147:
1070:
1010:
1003:
946:
944:
933:
466:Helmand Province
422:
421:
420:
409:
408:
407:
390:
389:
388:
377:
376:
375:
364:
363:
362:
200:
199:
185:
133:
127:
109:
34:
1168:
1167:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1150:deletion review
1143:
999:
997:
942:
934:
657:
651:
645:
639:
633:
626:
584:User:Mfstelmach
418:
416:
405:
403:
386:
384:
373:
371:
360:
358:
142:
129:
100:
84:
81:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1166:
1164:
1155:
1154:
1138:
1137:
1120:
1103:
1085:
1084:
1057:
1056:
1035:
1025:Cordless Larry
1014:
990:
989:
988:
987:
977:Cordless Larry
973:user talk page
952:
951:
926:
925:
909:
908:
886:
885:
884:
883:
882:
881:
880:
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
872:
871:
870:
869:
868:
867:
866:
865:
864:
863:
835:Cordless Larry
802:Cordless Larry
769:Cordless Larry
739:Cordless Larry
709:Cordless Larry
676:Cordless Larry
655:
649:
643:
637:
631:
624:
616:
615:
614:
613:
588:Cordless Larry
560:
559:
549:Cordless Larry
503:
502:
492:Cordless Larry
379:United Kingdom
327:
326:
325:
324:
314:Cordless Larry
296:BritishWatcher
287:
286:
279:
278:
211:Cordless Larry
203:
202:
139:
80:
79:
78:
70:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1165:
1153:
1151:
1146:
1140:
1139:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1124:
1121:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1104:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1087:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1058:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1036:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1015:
1013:
1008:
1004:
1002:
995:
992:
991:
986:
982:
978:
974:
969:
968:
967:
963:
959:
954:
953:
950:
945:
939:
938:
931:
928:
927:
924:
920:
916:
911:
910:
907:
903:
899:
895:
891:
888:
887:
862:
858:
854:
850:
846:
845:
844:
840:
836:
832:
828:
827:
826:
822:
818:
813:
812:
811:
807:
803:
799:
795:
794:
793:
789:
785:
780:
779:
778:
774:
770:
765:
764:
763:
759:
755:
750:
749:
748:
744:
740:
735:
734:
733:
729:
725:
720:
719:
718:
714:
710:
706:
702:
701:
700:
696:
692:
687:
686:
685:
681:
677:
673:
672:
671:
670:
666:
662:
654:
648:
642:
636:
630:
623:
620:
612:
608:
604:
599:
598:
597:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
576:
575:
574:
570:
566:
558:
554:
550:
546:
542:
541:
540:
539:
535:
531:
527:
521:
520:
516:
512:
508:
501:
497:
493:
489:
488:
487:
486:
482:
478:
474:
473:
468:
467:
462:
461:
456:
455:
450:
449:
444:
443:
438:
437:
432:
431:
426:
425:
413:
412:
411:United States
400:
399:
394:
393:
381:
380:
368:
367:
355:
354:
349:
348:
343:
342:
337:
336:
331:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
306:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
288:
284:
281:
280:
277:
273:
269:
265:
262:
261:
260:
259:
255:
251:
246:
243:article. The
242:
238:
233:
229:
225:
221:
220:
216:
212:
208:
198:
194:
191:
188:
184:
180:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
144:Find sources:
140:
137:
132:
125:
121:
117:
113:
108:
104:
99:
95:
91:
87:
83:
82:
77:
74:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1144:
1141:
1122:
1105:
1088:
1061:
1037:
1016:
1000:
993:
936:
929:
893:
889:
704:
658:
652:
646:
640:
634:
627:
621:
617:
580:userfication
561:
522:
504:
475:
469:
463:
457:
451:
445:
439:
433:
427:
414:
401:
395:
382:
369:
356:
350:
344:
338:
332:
328:
282:
263:
234:
230:
226:
222:
204:
192:
186:
178:
171:
165:
159:
153:
143:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
1127:Niteshift36
347:Afghanistan
169:free images
1110:Necrothesp
1042:WP:NOTLINK
958:Mfstelmach
915:Mfstelmach
853:Mfstelmach
817:Mfstelmach
784:Mfstelmach
754:Mfstelmach
724:Mfstelmach
691:Mfstelmach
661:Mfstelmach
603:Mfstelmach
565:Mfstelmach
530:Mfstelmach
511:Mfstelmach
477:Mfstelmach
250:Mfstelmach
207:WP:NOTLINK
1007:reasoning
1001:Abductive
472:Musa Qala
898:Location
268:User:NVO
136:View log
705:article
424:Germany
366:Estonia
283:Comment
264:Userify
239:to the
175:WP refs
163:scholar
103:protect
98:history
1123:Delete
1106:Delete
1089:Delete
1073:Nick-D
1046:Nick-D
1038:Delete
994:Delete
930:Delete
894:delete
890:Userfy
430:Kunduz
392:France
147:Google
131:delete
107:delete
46:delete
943:Talk
937:Tavix
892:then
190:JSTOR
151:books
134:) – (
124:views
116:watch
112:links
16:<
1131:talk
1114:talk
1097:talk
1093:Whpq
1077:talk
1062:Note
1050:talk
1029:talk
1017:Note
981:talk
962:talk
919:talk
902:talk
857:talk
839:talk
821:talk
806:talk
788:talk
773:talk
758:talk
743:talk
728:talk
713:talk
695:talk
680:talk
665:talk
607:talk
592:talk
569:talk
553:talk
534:talk
515:talk
496:talk
481:talk
470:18.
464:17.
458:16.
452:15.
446:14.
440:13.
434:12.
428:11.
415:10.
341:NATO
318:talk
300:talk
272:talk
254:talk
215:talk
183:FENS
157:news
120:logs
94:talk
90:edit
56:talk
51:Cirt
402:9.
396:8.
383:7.
370:6.
357:5.
351:4.
345:3.
339:2.
333:1.
197:TWL
1133:)
1116:)
1099:)
1079:)
1068:.
1052:)
1044:.
1031:)
983:)
975:.
964:)
940:|
921:)
904:)
859:)
841:)
833:.
823:)
808:)
790:)
775:)
760:)
745:)
730:)
715:)
697:)
682:)
667:)
609:)
594:)
586:.
571:)
555:)
536:)
517:)
498:)
483:)
320:)
312:.
302:)
274:)
256:)
217:)
209:.
177:)
122:|
118:|
114:|
110:|
105:|
101:|
96:|
92:|
58:)
48:.
1129:(
1112:(
1095:(
1075:(
1071:—
1048:(
1027:(
1009:)
1005:(
979:(
960:(
917:(
900:(
855:(
837:(
819:(
804:(
786:(
771:(
756:(
741:(
726:(
711:(
693:(
678:(
663:(
605:(
590:(
567:(
551:(
532:(
513:(
494:(
479:(
316:(
298:(
270:(
252:(
213:(
201:)
193:·
187:·
179:·
172:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
149:(
141:(
138:)
128:(
126:)
88:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.