48:. One incident does not normally make someone notable for wikipedia. Should reliable sources be found that indicates that this person is notable for multiple notable events, there is should be no prejudice against recreation—suitably cited and supported. --
279:, but not for deletion. I will grant that his name, plus inclusion of "contest" or "winner" or "Election" in searches give a great number of false positives... but is the degree of difficulty in sorting through all the permutations a reason to not do so?
274:
per multiple assertions of notability, and not just the one. The article has a bunch of references and external links that need be incorporated into the article as inline citations... and that seems a call for regular editing through
154:
303:. Of course, the links need a lot of cleanup (as does the rest of the article), but that's no reason to delete. I might even do a bit of it myself if the article's kept and time permits,
115:
212:
148:
88:
83:
311:
92:
75:
17:
169:
359:
seems like it is very much less than notable, but if the article is cleaned up and inline citations made then it could be good
136:
191:
436:
36:
130:
288:
435:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
421:
389:
368:
348:
319:
291:
266:
245:
227:
201:
57:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
398:
126:
79:
405:. If we had a WP article for every person who's ever won a game show, we would have a mess on our hands.
346:
176:
402:
71:
63:
257:, "a city in Grant County, Washington, United States". The population was 5,044 at the 2000 census.
417:
314:
304:
299:- I think the external links/references (or some of them at any rate) just push the subject over the
281:
276:
237:
383:
262:
241:
162:
329:
186:
254:
142:
339:
223:
196:
53:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
364:
300:
406:
378:
258:
219:
49:
109:
360:
376:
Per nominator. The notability seems to arise from only one event.--
332:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
429:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
105:
101:
97:
161:
337:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
175:
185:Only claim to notability was winning a game show
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
439:). No further edits should be made to this page.
213:list of Television-related deletion discussions
8:
397:per nom. I hardly think the subject passes
207:
211:: This debate has been included in the
253:Hey, we already have an article about
316:(Talk to me, or I'll eat your liver!)
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
422:00:36, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
390:20:05, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
369:11:24, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
349:00:35, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
320:22:28, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
292:22:15, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
267:20:03, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
246:07:47, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
228:02:39, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
202:22:26, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
58:08:08, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
301:general notability guideline
236:seems less than notable. -
456:
432:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
401:. Notable only for a
255:Quincy, Washington
44:The result was
420:
351:
230:
216:
72:Quincy Washington
64:Quincy Washington
447:
434:
416:
414:
413:
410:
386:
381:
342:
336:
334:
317:
309:
284:
217:
199:
194:
189:
180:
179:
165:
113:
95:
34:
455:
454:
450:
449:
448:
446:
445:
444:
443:
437:deletion review
430:
411:
408:
407:
384:
379:
340:
327:
315:
307:Lord Spongefrog
305:
282:
197:
192:
187:
122:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
453:
451:
442:
441:
425:
424:
399:WP:ENTERTAINER
392:
371:
357:Very weak keep
353:
352:
335:
324:
323:
322:
297:Semi-Weak Keep
294:
269:
248:
231:
183:
182:
119:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
452:
440:
438:
433:
427:
426:
423:
419:
415:
404:
400:
396:
393:
391:
388:
387:
382:
375:
372:
370:
366:
362:
358:
355:
354:
350:
347:
344:
343:
333:
331:
326:
325:
321:
318:
313:
310:
308:
302:
298:
295:
293:
290:
289:
286:
285:
278:
273:
270:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
249:
247:
243:
239:
235:
232:
229:
225:
221:
214:
210:
206:
205:
204:
203:
200:
195:
190:
178:
174:
171:
168:
164:
160:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
135:
132:
128:
125:
124:Find sources:
120:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
431:
428:
403:single event
394:
377:
373:
356:
341:Juliancolton
338:
328:
306:
296:
287:
280:
271:
250:
233:
208:
184:
172:
166:
158:
151:
145:
139:
133:
123:
45:
43:
31:
28:
149:free images
277:WP:Cleanup
193:(Contribs)
259:Mandsford
238:Schrandit
220:• Gene93k
330:Relisted
283:Schmidt,
116:View log
374:Delete.
188:Barryob
155:WP refs
143:scholar
89:protect
84:history
409:Snotty
395:Delete
361:DRosin
251:Delete
234:Delete
198:(Talk)
127:Google
93:delete
46:Delete
170:JSTOR
131:books
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
418:talk
412:Wong
385:Bull
380:Pink
365:talk
272:Keep
263:talk
242:talk
224:talk
209:Note
163:FENS
137:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
218:--
177:TWL
114:– (
50:Avi
367:)
345:|
265:)
244:)
226:)
215:.
157:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
363:(
312:,
261:(
240:(
222:(
181:)
173:·
167:·
159:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
134:·
129:(
121:(
118:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.