124:
Notability not established in secondary sources, heavy reliance on self-referential sources. Anon-ip removed prod, so sending to AfD. Only one source used is not a primary source (Xenu.net) - all other sources used in the article are primary sources. If the article is discussed enough in
194:
It's clear you don't know much if anything from your choices for mass-nomination. While I don't at all question your sincerity, I fear I must question your judgement. "Notability" and sourcing are guidelines, and this is an example of why - you do appear to have gone through a bureaucratic
418:
Postscript: I'd like to say sorry to Cirt for being such an arse on this AFD and several others. I may have disagreed with the deletion nominations, but being a dick was not the way to do it. I apologise to Cirt and the wiki in general for my dickishness. I shall try to do better -
348:
If enough evidence can be shown that there is significant coverage of this subject in independent secondary sources, I will withdraw my nomination and close this AfD myself.
117:
152:
Keep - nominator is woefully ignorant of subject area he is mass-nominating; these deletions should be struck as examples of sincere but ignorant bureaucratisation -
195:
box-ticking exercise when mass-nominating, rather than applying subject-area knowledge. As such, you should reasonably expect to have this pointed out -
90:
85:
94:
230:, which is official policy. If the article cannot be independently verified against openly published sources, it should not be included.
77:
17:
255:
214:
55:
310:
sources? Where? Which sources? That would be a much better AfD "Keep" rationale than going after the nominator.
299:
442:
36:
441:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
428:
411:
394:
377:
357:
337:
319:
267:
239:
204:
189:
161:
146:
59:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
385:
no external refs cited - although
Scientology and Hubbard are clearly notable not every book by Hubbard is.
333:
303:
227:
81:
424:
200:
157:
407:
73:
65:
286:
177:
134:
328:- the comments on the part of people who are knowledgeable about the subject are persuasive to me.
329:
306:
of the subject." Well? Has the subject of this article received such coverage in independent
420:
249:
235:
196:
153:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
403:
390:
284:
knowledge of the subject matter. I was putting that knowledge aside, because according to
353:
315:
263:
185:
142:
373:
307:
245:
231:
223:
126:
111:
386:
219:
130:
170:
is rude, an assumption and you have no idea what I do or do not know, and has
50:
349:
311:
259:
181:
138:
178:
subject matter is covered enough in secondary sources to assert notability
368:
435:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
290:, notability is assessed through coverage in other sources. "A
402:, article has only pro and anti scientology propoganda links.
366:
I am not really convinced his particular one is important.
298:
to be notable if it has received significant coverage in
107:
103:
99:
137:- that is not asserted in the article's present form.
48:. Note: editor comments about editors were ignored.
133:secondary sources so as to satisfy the criteria at
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
445:). No further edits should be made to this page.
168:Nominator is woefully ignorant of subject area
8:
7:
24:
180:. 12:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC).
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
176:to do with whether or not the
1:
429:22:09, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
412:00:01, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
395:17:11, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
378:05:13, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
358:15:49, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
338:18:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
320:12:41, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
268:13:18, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
240:13:16, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
205:12:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
190:12:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
162:12:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
147:11:18, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
60:02:25, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
462:
438:Please do not modify it.
280:For your information, I
32:Please do not modify it.
215:WP:No personal attacks
287:Knowledge:Notability
135:Knowledge:Notability
74:Route to Infinity
66:Route to Infinity
453:
440:
300:reliable sources
228:WP:Verifiability
115:
97:
34:
461:
460:
456:
455:
454:
452:
451:
450:
449:
443:deletion review
436:
88:
72:
69:
58:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
459:
457:
448:
447:
417:
415:
414:
397:
380:
346:
345:
341:
340:
323:
278:
277:
276:
275:
274:
273:
272:
271:
270:
258:), well put.
122:
121:
68:
63:
54:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
458:
446:
444:
439:
433:
432:
431:
430:
426:
422:
413:
409:
405:
401:
398:
396:
392:
388:
384:
381:
379:
375:
371:
370:
365:
362:
361:
360:
359:
355:
351:
343:
342:
339:
335:
331:
330:Phil Sandifer
327:
324:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
288:
283:
279:
269:
265:
261:
257:
254:
251:
247:
243:
242:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
216:
211:
208:
207:
206:
202:
198:
193:
192:
191:
187:
183:
179:
175:
174:
169:
165:
164:
163:
159:
155:
151:
150:
149:
148:
144:
140:
136:
132:
128:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
437:
434:
421:David Gerard
416:
399:
382:
367:
363:
347:
325:
295:
291:
285:
281:
252:
213:
209:
197:David Gerard
172:
171:
167:
154:David Gerard
123:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
404:AnteaterZot
364:Weak delete
304:independent
220:notability
218:. Second,
302:that are
232:• Gene93k
296:presumed
256:contribs
244:Thanks,
226:support
224:sourcing
212:. First
118:View log
56:contribs
344:Comment
246:Gene93k
210:Comment
173:nothing
166:Saying
91:protect
86:history
400:Delete
387:NBeale
383:Delete
95:delete
46:Delete
308:WP:RS
292:topic
127:WP:RS
112:views
104:watch
100:links
51:JERRY
16:<
425:talk
408:talk
391:talk
374:talk
354:talk
350:Cirt
334:talk
326:Keep
316:talk
312:Cirt
282:have
264:talk
260:Cirt
250:talk
236:talk
222:and
201:talk
186:talk
182:Cirt
158:talk
143:talk
139:Cirt
131:WP:V
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
369:DGG
294:is
116:– (
427:)
410:)
393:)
376:)
356:)
336:)
318:)
266:)
238:)
203:)
188:)
160:)
145:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
423:(
406:(
389:(
372:(
352:(
332:(
322:.
314:(
262:(
253:·
248:(
234:(
199:(
184:(
156:(
141:(
129:/
120:)
114:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.