Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Roy Nachum - Knowledge

Source 📝

128:
links supposedly establishing his notability don't really indicate he's a big deal. One of them does note that he his agent is making an effort to raise the artist’s profile. Ordinarily, as an inclusionist, I couldn't care less. I know plenty of artists in the city who would like to raise their profiles. I'm related to artists in the city who want to raise their profiles. I used to BE an artist in the city trying to raise his profile. I sympathise. But not enough to say with a straight face that this guy is notable without seeing more.--
127:
for speedy deletion but the tag was removed. The subject appears to be an aspiring NY artist. There is nothing notable about being an aspiring NY artist. According to the uncited sentence in the article, some celebrities and a few random people who don't have wikipedia pages have bought his art. The
170:
although he has mention in a variety of places it seems to always be in connection with the restuarant or his one painting in the gallery. I'm unsure if we have specific things on "creative designers" and "artists" but, if we don't this one does seem to fail
257:
He's beginning his career and there's some interest in his work, but he's not notable yet. There are no major exhibitions yet, no critical writing and no real evidence of being in any collections of note.
203: 116: 184:. Although I agree it is not a speedy candidate, I'm not seeing enough of an assertion of notability to convince me to keep this one. — 17: 89: 84: 93: 76: 293: 36: 292:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
211: 189: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
146: 265: 225: 133: 278: 249: 232: 215: 193: 158: 137: 58: 245: 207: 185: 258: 154: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
129: 229: 80: 241: 51: 150: 110: 176: 172: 124: 72: 64: 286:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
240:- nice beginnings, but not encyclopedia material....yet. 224:. He seems to have achieved some degree of notoriety. A 106: 102: 98: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 296:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 202:: This debate has been included in the 204:list of Visual arts-related deletions 7: 24: 228:exhibition is fairly important. 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 59:00:26, 11 August 2008 (UTC) 313: 279:14:37, 9 August 2008 (UTC) 250:23:18, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 233:03:43, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 216:20:47, 6 August 2008 (UTC) 194:20:47, 6 August 2008 (UTC) 159:12:35, 6 August 2008 (UTC) 138:04:11, 6 August 2008 (UTC) 289:Please do not modify it. 145:This AfD nomination was 32:Please do not modify it. 149:. It is listed now. 226:Moti Hasson Gallery 44:The result was 218: 304: 291: 275: 272: 269: 262: 198: 114: 96: 54: 34: 312: 311: 307: 306: 305: 303: 302: 301: 300: 294:deletion review 287: 273: 270: 267: 260: 87: 71: 68: 52: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 310: 308: 299: 298: 282: 281: 252: 235: 219: 208:David Eppstein 196: 186:David Eppstein 179: 164: 163: 162: 161: 121: 120: 67: 62: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 309: 297: 295: 290: 284: 283: 280: 277: 276: 264: 263: 256: 253: 251: 247: 243: 239: 236: 234: 231: 227: 223: 220: 217: 213: 209: 205: 201: 197: 195: 191: 187: 183: 180: 178: 174: 169: 166: 165: 160: 156: 152: 148: 144: 143: 142: 141: 140: 139: 135: 131: 126: 118: 112: 108: 104: 100: 95: 91: 86: 82: 78: 74: 70: 69: 66: 63: 61: 60: 57: 56: 55: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 288: 285: 266: 261:freshacconci 259: 254: 237: 221: 199: 181: 167: 125:this article 123:I nominated 122: 50: 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 182:Weak delete 168:Weak Delete 130:Cdogsimmons 230:Neutrality 147:incomplete 73:Roy_Nachum 65:Roy Nachum 242:Modernist 117:View log 151:DumbBOT 90:protect 85:history 255:Delete 238:Delete 94:delete 46:Delete 268:speak 111:views 103:watch 99:links 16:< 246:talk 222:Keep 212:talk 206:. – 200:Note 190:talk 177:WP:V 175:and 173:WP:N 155:talk 134:talk 107:logs 81:talk 77:edit 115:- ( 274:me 271:to 248:) 214:) 192:) 157:) 136:) 109:| 105:| 101:| 97:| 92:| 88:| 83:| 79:| 53:Ty 244:( 210:( 188:( 153:( 132:( 119:) 113:) 75:( 48:.

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Ty
00:26, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Roy Nachum
Roy_Nachum
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
this article
Cdogsimmons
talk
04:11, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
incomplete
DumbBOT
talk
12:35, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
WP:N
WP:V
David Eppstein
talk
20:47, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
list of Visual arts-related deletions

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.