546:-- You cannot expect to find a lot of English language sources on a Georgian subject. An academic with 103 articles and 2 monographs has a large body of work, but you cannot expect English language citation indices to record this. Transliteration is not an exact science and even a minor difference in that is liable to upset the count from any citation index. If Georgian WP thinks her notable, I do not think we English one should dissent. Translation notices are only appropriate where the English needs improving.
480:
of citation patterns between fields is well-known to anybody who frequents academic pages, and allowance is (or should) be made. One compares like with like; theology with theology- computer science with computer science. If notability is to be proved, sources have to be found and in this case they have not been yet.
510:. The article makes no case for notability by scholarly impact (not just publication) or in any other way. I'd be willing to change my mind if someone here turns up significantly better sources about the subject, but I suspect such sources would be in Georgian, making them difficult for non-Georgians to find. β
479:
That is one opinion, ten years old. Since then GS has expanded in scope and, if citations exist, GS will usually find them. GS will certainly find citations to humanities subjects. However, citations in humanities, particularly by older scholars, tend to be fewer than in the sciences. The difference
776:: NACADEMIC generally supports notability of a full professor and department head. We do have language issues and if the content that is in there is verifiable, which it apparently is, then it is clear this individual meets the GNG threshold. Maybe not by a big margin, but enough.
344:
355:
340:
317:
338:
Greetings! Material presented in this article is verified and trusted, so reason for deleting it is not fair. It is partly translated and checked with relevant sources. Please, cancel requirement for deleting. Sincerely, Giorgi
Chubinidze.
364:. I have not found sources in English that show that Gujejiani is notable. Can you give us any in Georgian that discuss her or her work? (We can use Google Translate to read them, but it's hard to search if you don't know Georgian). β
837:). This is a significantly higher bar than just being a full professor (a term which, by the way, only makes sense in a North American context). Besides, her English faculty page says Gujejiani is an associate professor
183:
273:
234:
640:
here - not even that. So GS count remains at 0. I can find nothing in
Georgian as well. The person is not notable even by Georgian standards of academia as far as I understand them.
321:
817:. If other editors think there's likely to be enough coverage in Georgian sources to keep this article then I'd consider that a good outcome, but I'm not sure where this idea that
136:
438:
Yes but it's not nearly as good at indexing and calculating metrics for non-English scholarship. It's also comparatively poor at finding history and humanities papers. See
177:
736:-- a full professor would generally be kept if they were part of the English-speaking world; it's hard to evaluate the subject's body of work given the language barrier.
632:
584:
293:
65:
The person holds or has held a named chair appointment or
Distinguished Professor can be applied reliably only for persons who are tenured at the full professor level
360:
It's not enough that the information is correct, the subject has to be notable. The notability criteria for academics on the
English Knowledge (XXG) can be found at
635:
586:
253:
568:
be expected to find citations, if they exist. It has never been a
Knowledge (XXG) policy that if sources cannot be found, it can be assumed that they exist.
143:
109:
104:
113:
17:
96:
198:
717:
165:
944:
I am not sure why XFDcloser is not listing 3rd relists in the proper category, it does for me. I foun some mentions in GS.
860:
696:
666:
876:
977:
40:
645:
222:
953:
721:
63:
leads me to believe that this argument is a mis-reading of the
Specific criteria notes for criteria 5, which says,
159:
515:
958:
936:
915:
883:
851:
804:
782:
763:
745:
726:
687:
649:
625:
603:
577:
555:
538:
519:
489:
456:
432:
418:
394:
375:
348:
333:
305:
285:
265:
245:
226:
78:
155:
551:
329:
301:
281:
261:
634:
here we only have a reference to something she's written, not the article itself by Rozeta
Gujejiani, same
407:
I'm not sure GS is going to be a very useful metric for a historian writing exclusively (?) in
Georgian. β
100:
641:
218:
60:
53:
973:
741:
445:
cautions "the absence of references in Google
Scholar should not be used as proof of non-notability". β
205:
36:
215:
92:
84:
800:
759:
621:
573:
485:
428:
390:
511:
191:
609:
67:. That doesn't mean that full professors are notable. It means that named chair appointees must
932:
712:
547:
325:
297:
277:
257:
75:
846:
533:
451:
413:
370:
239:
171:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
972:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
924:
903:
899:
895:
834:
818:
638:
613:
588:
442:
361:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
737:
911:
796:
755:
617:
597:
569:
481:
424:
402:
386:
838:
948:
777:
678:
928:
821:
presumes full professors are notable is coming from. What it actually says is that a
706:
72:
902:. There is no other significant evidence that has been brought up to show passing
841:
528:
446:
408:
365:
130:
923:. The subject's modest accomplishments and positions don't rise to the level of
590:? Not having an opinion per se but zero GS cites seems to be incorrect. Regards
793:
NACADEMIC generally supports notability of a full professor and department head
907:
631:
I don't see any articles in those 4 links (rather 3) authored by the suspect.
592:
56:
assumes that full professors are notable. Several people disagree with this.
871:
A reluctant relist.Some arguments seem to be lacking policy-based rationales.
608:
Well done in digging out these 4 cites, but they are not in-depth enough for
945:
898:. Being a full professor or a department head is certainly not enough for
527:
unless additional sources are forthcoming. There's nothing I can find. β
439:
966:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
894:. There is just too little evidence to indicate notability per
754:
The statement above has no foundation in policy or precedent.
863:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
699:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
669:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
423:
GS list writings in
Georgian, as you will see from the link.
274:
list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
322:
the article he created in the Georgian wp on 20 August 2015
324:, if it is kept will need to have a translation notice?
126:
122:
118:
235:
list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions
190:
875:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
705:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
675:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
316:, this article was created on 21 September 2015 by
204:
214:Not in any way notable, does not meet criteria in
52:. The major argument in favor of keeping is that
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
980:). No further edits should be made to this page.
791:Please give policy support to your claim that
564:I disagree. Nowadays powerful search engines
8:
294:list of History-related deletion discussions
292:Note: This debate has been included in the
272:Note: This debate has been included in the
252:Note: This debate has been included in the
233:Note: This debate has been included in the
795:. I can find no such justification there.
291:
271:
254:list of Women-related deletion discussions
251:
232:
320:, and is almost a word-for-word copy of
583:What about these cites I found on GS?
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
385:. Fair or not, GS cites are zero.
24:
612:and are not enough in number for
833:can be presumed to be notable (
1:
959:15:01, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
937:20:00, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
79:23:50, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
997:
916:22:43, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
884:05:53, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
852:21:48, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
805:22:39, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
783:20:25, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
764:22:28, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
746:17:42, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
727:15:07, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
688:10:25, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
650:13:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
626:09:53, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
604:09:44, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
578:22:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
556:14:52, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
539:08:34, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
520:07:32, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
490:00:04, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
457:22:41, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
433:22:21, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
419:11:16, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
395:22:38, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
376:11:16, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
349:19:58, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
334:15:43, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
306:15:02, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
286:15:02, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
266:15:02, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
246:09:40, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
227:09:13, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
969:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
827:distinguished professor
71:be full professors. --
906:on other grounds.
869:Relisting comment:
637:here as well, and
59:My own reading of
956:
951:
886:
850:
831:major institution
729:
724:
690:
686:
642:Scrabble Scribble
537:
455:
417:
374:
308:
288:
268:
248:
219:Scrabble Scribble
988:
971:
954:
949:
881:
874:
866:
864:
844:
780:
715:
709:
704:
702:
700:
685:
683:
676:
674:
672:
670:
600:
595:
531:
449:
411:
406:
368:
359:
244:
209:
208:
194:
146:
134:
116:
93:Rozeta Gujejiani
85:Rozeta Gujejiani
34:
996:
995:
991:
990:
989:
987:
986:
985:
984:
978:deletion review
967:
950:(distænt write)
888:
877:
859:
857:
778:
730:
707:
695:
693:
691:
679:
677:
665:
663:
598:
593:
400:
356:αααα αα α©α£ααααα«α
353:
341:αααα αα α©α£ααααα«α
318:αααα αα α©α£ααααα«α
238:
151:
142:
107:
91:
88:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
994:
992:
983:
982:
962:
961:
939:
918:
872:
867:
856:
855:
854:
811:
810:
809:
808:
786:
785:
770:
769:
768:
767:
749:
748:
703:
692:
673:
662:
661:
660:
659:
658:
657:
656:
655:
654:
653:
652:
559:
558:
541:
522:
512:David Eppstein
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
493:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
441:. This is why
380:
379:
378:
336:
310:
309:
289:
269:
249:
212:
211:
148:
87:
82:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
993:
981:
979:
975:
970:
964:
963:
960:
957:
952:
947:
943:
940:
938:
934:
930:
926:
922:
919:
917:
913:
909:
905:
901:
897:
893:
890:
889:
887:
885:
882:
880:
879:Winged Blades
870:
865:
862:
853:
848:
843:
839:
836:
832:
828:
824:
820:
816:
813:
812:
806:
802:
798:
794:
790:
789:
788:
787:
784:
781:
775:
772:
771:
765:
761:
757:
753:
752:
751:
750:
747:
743:
739:
735:
732:
731:
728:
723:
719:
714:
710:
701:
698:
689:
684:
682:
671:
668:
651:
647:
643:
639:
636:
633:
630:
629:
627:
623:
619:
615:
611:
607:
606:
605:
602:
601:
596:
589:
587:
585:
582:
581:
579:
575:
571:
567:
563:
562:
561:
560:
557:
553:
549:
548:Peterkingiron
545:
542:
540:
535:
530:
526:
523:
521:
517:
513:
509:
506:
505:
491:
487:
483:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
468:
467:
458:
453:
448:
444:
440:
437:
436:
434:
430:
426:
422:
421:
420:
415:
410:
404:
399:
398:
396:
392:
388:
384:
381:
377:
372:
367:
363:
357:
352:
351:
350:
346:
342:
337:
335:
331:
327:
326:Coolabahapple
323:
319:
315:
312:
311:
307:
303:
299:
298:Coolabahapple
295:
290:
287:
283:
279:
278:Coolabahapple
275:
270:
267:
263:
259:
258:Coolabahapple
255:
250:
247:
243:
242:
236:
231:
230:
229:
228:
224:
220:
217:
207:
203:
200:
197:
193:
189:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
157:
154:
153:Find sources:
149:
145:
141:
138:
132:
128:
124:
120:
115:
111:
106:
102:
98:
94:
90:
89:
86:
83:
81:
80:
77:
74:
70:
66:
62:
57:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
968:
965:
941:
920:
891:
878:
873:
868:
858:
830:
826:
822:
814:
792:
773:
733:
694:
680:
664:
591:
565:
543:
524:
507:
382:
313:
241:CAPTAIN RAJU
240:
213:
201:
195:
187:
180:
174:
168:
162:
152:
139:
68:
64:
61:WP:NACADEMIC
58:
54:WP:NACADEMIC
49:
47:
31:
28:
823:named chair
738:K.e.coffman
216:WP:ACADEMIC
178:free images
955:)evidence(
900:WP:PROF#C5
835:WP:PROF#C5
797:Xxanthippe
756:Xxanthippe
681:Sandstein
618:Xxanthippe
570:Xxanthippe
482:Xxanthippe
425:Xxanthippe
403:Xxanthippe
387:Xxanthippe
974:talk page
779:Montanabw
610:WP:Author
37:talk page
976:or in a
929:Lambtron
861:Relisted
697:Relisted
667:Relisted
137:View log
73:RoySmith
39:or in a
942:Comment
925:WP:PROF
904:WP:PROF
896:WP:PROF
819:WP:PROF
815:Comment
614:WP:Prof
443:WP:PROF
362:WP:PROF
314:Comment
184:WPΒ refs
172:scholar
110:protect
105:history
921:Delete
892:Delete
525:Delete
508:Delete
383:Delete
156:Google
114:delete
76:(talk)
50:delete
908:Nsk92
829:at a
199:JSTOR
160:books
144:Stats
131:views
123:watch
119:links
16:<
946:L3X1
933:talk
912:talk
847:talk
840:. β
801:talk
774:Keep
760:talk
742:talk
734:Keep
713:talk
646:talk
622:talk
574:talk
552:talk
544:Keep
534:talk
516:talk
486:talk
452:talk
429:talk
414:talk
391:talk
371:talk
345:talk
330:talk
302:talk
282:talk
262:talk
223:talk
192:FENS
166:news
127:logs
101:talk
97:edit
69:also
842:Joe
825:or
708:GSS
599:Why
566:can
529:Joe
447:Joe
409:Joe
366:Joe
206:TWL
135:β (
935:)
927:.
914:)
803:)
762:)
744:)
725:)
722:em
648:)
628:.
624:)
616:.
594:So
580:.
576:)
554:)
518:)
488:)
435:.
431:)
397:.
393:)
347:)
332:)
304:)
296:.
284:)
276:.
264:)
256:.
237:.
225:)
186:)
129:|
125:|
121:|
117:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
931:(
910:(
849:)
845:(
807:.
799:(
766:.
758:(
740:(
720:|
718:c
716:|
711:(
644:(
620:(
572:(
550:(
536:)
532:(
514:(
492:.
484:(
454:)
450:(
427:(
416:)
412:(
405::
401:@
389:(
373:)
369:(
358::
354:@
343:(
328:(
300:(
280:(
260:(
221:(
210:)
202:Β·
196:Β·
188:Β·
181:Β·
175:Β·
169:Β·
163:Β·
158:(
150:(
147:)
140:Β·
133:)
95:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.