248:. I have made minor edits to this entry including adding some 'notability references' up front for clarity. I believe these demonstrate compliance with the notability guidelines as show significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. There are also some broader (non work) biographical references in some of the referenced interviews, which would be interesting later additions.
394:. Again fair point (and yes sorry about the double vote), but the notability is work related so it tends to be a bit CVish. Like I said above, there are also some broader (non work) biographical references in some of the referenced interviews, which would be interesting later additions. Looks like I'm struggling to convince though.
305:
The only real claim to notability is the 2003 Manager of the Year award. Good but not enough in the absence of other independent coverage. The other references are mostly to the Arup website (non-independent coverage) and one to the alumni newsletter. The plain google search results lisyted are not
48:
and keep since there are no BLP concerns over the article. The main question in this debate has been whether the awards Mr. Leslie-Carter has won are a sufficient basis for notability, and with no consensus that they're not sufficient, and with a reasonable case being made for either side, this
281:
189:
It may be worth improving the content if it reads too much like a CV, but the references given do contain 'reliable secondary sources' which makes the subject notable albeit in a specialist field
310:
313:
340:. Gee tough crowd! The award is from the largest independent professional body of its kind in Europe, with over 16,500 individual and 450 corporate members throughout the UK and abroad
451:
428:
needs rewriting in the correct format, but the awards are sufficient for notability. I started the rewrite by removing the duplicatelist of references at the start.
122:
352:). Of particular note is that both references have very good depth i.e. they are multi-page articles specifically about the subject. I agree with the subject fails
307:
89:
84:
93:
204:
76:
234:
17:
412:
382:
263:
173:
349:) are independent magazine articles that are just scanned as pdfs on the arup site (i.e. they are reliable and independent
135:
347:
535:
350:
36:
534:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
520:
505:
482:
461:
439:
416:
386:
332:
295:
267:
238:
208:
179:
140:
58:
49:
article stays. As noted, improvements to the article are desirable, at present there are no categories listed.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
200:
130:
80:
517:
192:
291:
230:
162:
53:
498:
408:
378:
259:
395:
361:
249:
222:
196:
72:
64:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
514:
477:
328:
344:
457:
353:
320:
287:
226:
154:
50:
491:
435:
404:
374:
357:
316:
255:
150:
158:
110:
471:
341:
324:
221:
anyway, but I wanted to mention that if it's even kept, it should be moved to
430:
129:
This article reads like a CV while the subject seems to be not notable. →
528:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
157:, but that fails as well. I can't find anything on him in any
282:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
343:. Wrt the Arup references, fair point but the first two (
117:
106:
102:
98:
403:. We should note that he is Claire Saxby's husband. —
490:
per DGG. Seems notable enough for an article here.--
153:. There's a remote possibility he would qualify for
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
538:). No further edits should be made to this page.
452:list of Australia-related deletion discussions
8:
309:and there is only one hit in GoogleScholar
450:: This debate has been included in the
280:: This debate has been included in the
7:
24:
356:but it ticks all the boxes for
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
373:. Knowledge is not for CVs. —
1:
555:
306:impressive (only 68 ghits)
227:Raymie Humbert (TrackerTV)
521:05:57, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
506:11:00, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
483:06:26, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
462:06:21, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
440:03:12, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
417:18:09, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
387:08:16, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
333:06:47, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
296:05:55, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
268:08:16, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
239:23:51, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
209:22:06, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
180:21:33, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
141:21:24, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
59:07:58, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
531:Please do not modify it.
254:You "vote" once only. —
32:Please do not modify it.
312:. Nothing in GoogleNews
315:. In my opinion fails
469:but improve per DGG.
319:and certainly fails
225:to fit conventions.
44:The result was
503:
455:
285:
223:Rob Leslie-Carter
211:
195:comment added by
176:
168:
73:Rob Leslie-Carter
65:Rob Leslie-Carter
56:
546:
533:
501:
497:
446:
276:
190:
172:
166:
159:reliable sources
149:Appears to fail
138:
133:
120:
114:
96:
54:
34:
554:
553:
549:
548:
547:
545:
544:
543:
542:
536:deletion review
529:
499:
481:
177:
136:
131:
116:
87:
71:
68:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
552:
550:
541:
540:
524:
523:
508:
485:
475:
464:
443:
442:
423:
422:
421:
420:
419:
367:
366:
365:
364:
299:
298:
273:
272:
271:
270:
242:
241:
212:
183:
182:
171:
127:
126:
67:
62:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
551:
539:
537:
532:
526:
525:
522:
519:
516:
512:
509:
507:
504:
502:
495:
494:
489:
486:
484:
479:
474:
473:
468:
465:
463:
459:
453:
449:
445:
444:
441:
437:
433:
432:
427:
424:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
399:
398:
397:
393:
390:
389:
388:
384:
380:
376:
372:
369:
368:
363:
359:
355:
351:
348:
345:
342:
339:
336:
335:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
311:
308:
304:
301:
300:
297:
293:
289:
283:
279:
275:
274:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
252:
251:
247:
244:
243:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
213:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
188:
185:
184:
181:
175:
169:
165:
160:
156:
152:
148:
145:
144:
143:
142:
139:
134:
124:
119:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
530:
527:
510:
496:
492:
487:
470:
466:
447:
429:
425:
400:
396:Claire Saxby
391:
370:
362:Claire Saxby
337:
302:
277:
250:Claire Saxby
245:
218:
214:
197:Claire Saxby
186:
163:
146:
128:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
191:—Preceding
500:Buzz Me...
217:I support
513:Per DGG.
458:Mattinbgn
288:Pete.Hurd
132:Christian
51:Sjakkalle
413:contribs
405:RHaworth
383:contribs
375:RHaworth
264:contribs
256:RHaworth
235:archives
231:receiver
219:deletion
205:contribs
193:unsigned
123:View log
55:(Check!)
401:Comment
392:Comment
354:WP:PROF
338:Comment
321:WP:PROF
303:Delete.
246:Comment
215:Comment
167:endaliv
155:WP:PROF
90:protect
85:history
371:Delete
358:WP:BIO
317:WP:BIO
151:WP:BIO
147:Delete
118:delete
94:delete
518:Years
493:Sting
472:giggy
325:Nsk92
161:. --/
121:) – (
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
515:Five
511:Keep
488:Keep
467:Keep
448:Note
436:talk
426:Keep
409:Talk
379:Talk
346:and
329:talk
292:talk
278:Note
260:Talk
201:talk
187:Keep
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
456:--
454:.
431:DGG
286:--
284:.
174:Δ's
478::O
460:\
438:)
415:)
411:|
385:)
381:|
331:)
323:.
294:)
266:)
262:|
237:)
233:,
207:)
203:•
178:/
170://
137:.И
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
480:)
476:(
434:(
407:(
377:(
360:.
327:(
290:(
258:(
229:(
199:(
164:M
125:)
115:(
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.